Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Bryan Reynolds’s requests trade

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, beautox said:

White Sox Get Reynolds

Pirates Get Montgomery, Crochet, and Ramos or Rodriguez 

What if Vaughn was the main asset. 

  • Replies 148
  • Views 15.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Sleepy Harold
    Sleepy Harold

    Hell yeah, I was waiting for a proposal like this to hit the board. 

  • giving away all our top prospects for a 3 win player? what am i missing

  • I think you’re going to overboard eithe the talent offer.    I could see a Gavin Sheets. Jake Burger and maybe Davis Martin                 

4 minutes ago, Chisoxfn said:

What if Vaughn was the main asset. 

Vaughn only has one more year of control over Reynolds.

33 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

There is very little chance this team is under .500 come July tho. Just Parkman  managing expectations in his own head. 

Come on man. This team is projected to be below .500 for the season by ZiPS, lost Abreu and Cueto, was under .500 last July, and has a tougher schedule this year. There is certainly a chance of that, a solid one.

8 minutes ago, Chisoxfn said:

What if Vaughn was the main asset. 

Montgomery and Vaughn as the core is a strong offer. Might still not win but a solid offer.

  • Author
Just now, Balta1701 said:

Come on man. This team is projected to be below .500 for the season by ZiPS, lost Abreu and Cueto, was under .500 last July, and has a tougher schedule this year. There is certainly a chance of that, a solid one.

Those ZiPS projections are insanely conservative for our younger position players though.  I think with even just reasonable additions it’s unlikely we finish below .500 next year.

  • Author
Just now, Balta1701 said:

Montgomery and Vaughn as the core is a strong offer. Might still not win but a solid offer.

Who is offering more than that?

21 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Who is offering more than that?

We have a really good recent comparison. Adam Eaton was a guy with 3 years of control coming off 2 five win seasons.

He returned a guy who was recently a top 10 prospect but who had a down season (Gio), a consensus top 50 prospect, and a borderline top 100 prospect, plus another wild card. Right now, Montgomery is #60 by MLB.com, and Vaughn although he has substantial value still he has put up two negative years, clearly can’t play anywhere other than 1b, and has already lost two pre arbitration years. Those two have clearly less value than the Sox got for Eaton.

Numerous teams can match that with two top 75 prospects. Cleveland, LAD, St Louis are some I noted earlier, and those offers would have a big advantage over Vaughn for Pittsburgh because they have two extra years of control on a guy.

11 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

We have a really good recent comparison. Adam Eaton was a guy with 3 years of control coming off 2 five win seasons.

He returned a guy who was recently a top 10 prospect but who had a down season (Gio), a consensus top 50 prospect, and a borderline top 100 prospect, plus another wild card. Right now, Montgomery is #60 by MLB.com, and Vaughn although he has substantial value still he has put up two negative years, clearly can’t play anywhere other than 1b, and has already lost two pre arbitration years. Those two have clearly less value than the Sox got for Eaton.

Numerous teams can match that with two top 75 prospects. Cleveland, LAD, St Louis are some I noted earlier, and those offers would have a big advantage over Vaughn for Pittsburgh because they have two extra years of control on a guy.

At the time of trade, Giolito was a top 10 (but would drop with the new update), and Lopez was a top 50 (late 40s). Dunning was the fringe 100-150 guy that finally made the list a a year later 

4 minutes ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

At the time of trade, Giolito was a top 10 (but would drop with the new update), and Lopez was a top 50 (late 40s). Dunning was the fringe 100-150 guy that finally made the list a a year later 

These were their MLB pipeline rankings

There was no fourth player in the Eaton trade. It was Gio, Lopey and Dunning.

3 minutes ago, FourEyesShottenhoffer said:

There was no fourth player in the Eaton trade. It was Gio, Lopey and Dunning.

Correct. The 4 player trades were Sale and Quintana 

Sox turned Hector Santiago, via Eaton, into Gio, Lopez and Lynn(via Dunning). You’d think a front office that could pull that kind of trick would be world beaters

Edited by FourEyesShottenhoffer

And Santiago was acquired with a 30th round draft pick. Perhaps the most lucrative 30th rd pick ever made.

  • Author
18 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

We have a really good recent comparison. Adam Eaton was a guy with 3 years of control coming off 2 five win seasons.

He returned a guy who was recently a top 10 prospect but who had a down season (Gio), a consensus top 50 prospect, and a borderline top 100 prospect, plus another wild card. Right now, Montgomery is #60 by MLB.com, and Vaughn although he has substantial value still he has put up two negative years, clearly can’t play anywhere other than 1b, and has already lost two pre arbitration years. Those two have clearly less value than the Sox got for Eaton.

Numerous teams can match that with two top 75 prospects. Cleveland, LAD, St Louis are some I noted earlier, and those offers would have a big advantage over Vaughn for Pittsburgh because they have two extra years of control on a guy.

The game has radically changed since then and blue chip prospects are more valuable than ever.  The Adam Eaton deal is a poor comp for a Reynolds trade.

Regardless, two top 75 prospects is not worth the same as Montgomery & Vaughn.  Teams aren’t stupid.  Andrew was a top 20 prospect who was rushed like crazy and played out of position by a desperately dumb organization.  This same kid had a 125 wRC+ through August of last year despite the worst hitting coach in baseball playing up his worst tendencies and before his legs wore out from playing the OF.  Every intelligent organization would die to acquire him and watch him develop into a 140 wRC+ hitter.  He’s worth considerably more than you think he is despite only four years of control.

And conveniently you use the MLB.com rankings for Montgomery and not Baseball America’s, who have him as the #35 overall prospect.  The difference between the #35 prospect and a guy in the 60’s or 70’s is massive.  And guys like Montgomery, especially of the positional variety, don’t get moved very often in this day and age.  He is the type of centerpiece prospect that would get the Pirates’ attention and one very clubs would be willing to match.  Honestly, I’m doubtful the Sox would even consider moving him.

I truly believe something like Montgomery, Ramos, & Vera would be incredibly tempting to the Pirates and I’m not sure many teams would actually want to pay a steeper price than that.

1 6 WAR season that then regressed to his mean of 3 isn't worth all these crazy packages I'm seeing, 3 years of control or not.

  • Author
26 minutes ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

At the time of trade, Giolito was a top 10 (but would drop with the new update), and Lopez was a top 50 (late 40s). Dunning was the fringe 100-150 guy that finally made the list a a year later 

The Giolito ranking is very misleading as he was losing some helium by the time we acquired him.

Edited by Chicago White Sox

I would feel so bad for Vaughn if he finally got to play 1st base everyday and it had to be for the Pirates.

1 minute ago, joemg311 said:

I would feel so bad for Vaughn if he finally got to play 1st base everyday and it had to be for the Pirates.

They signed and traded for a 1B this off-season, though I guess Choi could be flipped or Santana/Choi can work as a platoon.

7 minutes ago, Dam8610 said:

1 6 WAR season that then regressed to his mean of 3 isn't worth all these crazy packages I'm seeing, 3 years of control or not.

The mean would have been his 4.5 war rookie season. Again his offensive WAR last year was around 4.5, but he was dinged for defense in center when should be in a corner and would be with the Sox. I don’t know what happened in 2020 but I imagine over a full season he would have rebounded. 

We don't acquire players like him. A waste of thread space. 

i'd trade Vaughn for him, but it would sting now that abreu already signed with houston

a shame the sox couldn't have tried to pull this off last year.  would've allowed them to re-sign abreu for a couple more years and solidify their OF

i wish we had a real GM

1 minute ago, SonofaRoache said:

We don't acquire players like him. A waste of thread space. 

This is the only counter argument that I agree with.

So the Pirates dish out their largest free agent contract in half a decade and Reynolds demands a trade? Strange timing.

The pirates could sign Judge and they’d still be dog s%*#. Adding Santana isn’t going to do squat for that team

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Who is offering more than that?

That would be too much - so no one would be my guess. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.