Jump to content

Oakland/Sac. A's have committed $130 million in offseason, boosting payroll to at least $105


caulfield12

Recommended Posts

  • caulfield12 changed the title to Oakland/Sac. A's have committed $130 million in offseason, boosting payroll to at least $105

I know that throwing money around doesn't necessarily solve problems, but I'm tired of hearing the rebuilding excuse for fielding an awful team. The Sox were rebuilding in the late 1990s, but they had young talent like Carlos Lee and Magglio Ordonez. I see no such talent on this team. 

I've heard the rebuilding promises many times. I tune that out now. It's team to act like a major league franchise. I won't go to the ballpark until the White Sox stop the 100-loss seasons.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"USA Today’s Bob Nightengale reported in November that the team plans to carry a payroll of around $100 million next season. If that’s to be believed, the A’s, currently at approximately $64 million, have a ways to go.

There are two main forces pushing the financial aggressiveness, one simple and one multi-tentacled.

The kinder, more straightforward reading goes like this: The A’s, in an attempt to drum up fan support in Sacramento and Las Vegas, are actually investing in the on-field product. Even an average three years in the California capital could get fans in Southern Nevada excited about the club’s planned desert arrival in 2028. Securing a player such as Rooker gives future A’s fans in Vegas something to watch and care about before the team shows up.

But that dynamic, while a fortunate byproduct, is not the biggest factor driving the organization’s offseason. That’s because the A’s, according to the current collective bargaining agreement, need to enter 2025 with a payroll around $105 million in order to receive the $70 million in revenue-sharing funds that they are expecting."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

million in order to keep qualifying for MLB revenue sharing payments, which amount to roughly $70 million in additional financial subsidies per season.  

https://sports.yahoo.com/why-are-the-as-spending-big-this-winter-as-they-relocate-to-sacramento-204029778.html

Can someone smarter than me answer this question...does revenue sharing money have to be used for specific spending, i.e. player payroll? Or can teams just do whatever they want with it?

Edited by Ducksnort
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ducksnort said:

Can someone smarter than me answer this question...does revenue sharing money have to be used for specific spending, i.e. player payroll? Or can teams just do whatever they want with it?

There don't seem to be any conditions placed...with the A's very specifically, a carve out was done to protect them because of the relocation and attendance issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ducksnort said:

Can someone smarter than me answer this question...does revenue sharing money have to be used for specific spending, i.e. player payroll? Or can teams just do whatever they want with it?

Everything I've seen says the teams can do what they want with it, even put it in the bank as the Pirates and Marlins were doing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lip Man 1 said:

Everything I've seen says the teams can do what they want with it, even put it in the bank as the Pirates and Marlins were doing.  

So there's literally no point to revenue sharing. Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Highland said:

I know that throwing money around doesn't necessarily solve problems, but I'm tired of hearing the rebuilding excuse for fielding an awful team. The Sox were rebuilding in the late 1990s, but they had young talent like Carlos Lee and Magglio Ordonez. I see no such talent on this team. 

I've heard the rebuilding promises many times. I tune that out now. It's team to act like a major league franchise. I won't go to the ballpark until the White Sox stop the 100-loss seasons.

Without a Magglio Ordonez or a Carlos Lee, what are we spending to add to, exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Without a Magglio Ordonez or a Carlos Lee, what are we spending to add to, exactly?

Add too late and you risk losing a Rodon to FA or Anderson to ineffectiveness...add too early and you shorten the competitive window down to 3-4 seasons.

San Diego is basically done for 2-3 years without Sasaki...as 2024 was their last, best opportunity to knock off LA.  Same with Toronto if they lose Bichette and Guerrero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

A payroll of 105 dollars seems low even for the A’s

Well...haven't you heard that mantra repeated ad nauseum everything is more expensive in California these days?

$105 Sounds like a rounding error on the Dodgers' payroll, but still almost double where the White Sox are heading without Robert and Benintendi.

 

 

Meanwhile, Cohen doing Cohen things...

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/mets-sign-elian-pena-to-5-million-bonus-to-open-2025-international-signing-period/

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.si.com/mlb/athletics/news/a-s-announce-season-tickets-have-sold-out-in-sacramento-01jha1q15y0g

A's sold out of season tickets already in Sacramento...would be atoughly 1.35 million in attendance (81 x 14,014) if sold out the entire inventory of seats.

Would be right at White Sox 2024, 1999 and 1989 attendance marks.

So the Sox will "battle" for 27th/28th in attendance this year with the Marlins and Rays likely...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"The A’s brought Luis Severino aboard to anchor their rotation. That two-year deal with a player option for a third could have a total value of $67 million, making it the largest contract in franchise history. The A’s also signed third baseman Gio Urshela and reliever José Leclerc, while re-signing lefty T.J. McFarland. They traded with the Rays for lefty Jeffrey Springs. They extended designated hitter Brent Rooker on a five-year, $60 million pact. And their international class includes two-way Japanese star Shotaro Morii, whose $1.5 million signing bonus was the largest ever for a Japanese amateur outside Nippon Professional Baseball. All told, the A’s have invested north of $150 million in talent this winter."        https://www.mlb.com/news/biggest-surprises-from-2024-2025-mlb-offseason

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...