Jump to content

Luis Robert trade thread: La Pantera stays.


Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

Utility infielders that have a higher fWAR than Luis Robert this season.

As does Tyrone Taylor, the CF he would presumably replace.  
I know it won't be a ton. But the Sox are already loaded with likely utility infielders,  AAAA outfielders, and Rule 5 guys.  Much prefer some A Ball lottery tickets.  There were overpays at the deadline last year for players having poor seasons with nowhere near his upside (although mostly on the pitching side).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mets' minor leagues also offer an abundance of options, though none of the players are ready now. MLB Pipeline lists nine players in the Mets’ top 30 who can play outfield, from Jett Williams (No. 2) and Ryan Clifford (No. 4), whose primary positions are in the infield, to Drew Gilbert (No. 10) and speedster Nick Morabito (No. 17). None of those players are ready now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Well thankfully trades are only based on the fWAR of players for like 40 games and nothing else.

Well, you’re right, I bet Robert’s $15M salary and $2M buyout will be a factor as well.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Add on the injury history (I mean, the man has missed the last couple of games).

Right. Many here think I’m only negative with Robert but if you put yourself in another team’s shoes what’s there to like with this profile? If you can somehow revert him back to his 2023 form sure it’s worth the risk but how many contenders are looking for an oft-injured, underperforming reclamation project that’s being compensated handsomely over the next 2.5 seasons (if they even pick up the options)? I’m sure they’d take him but they aren’t giving up much in return imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, GreenSox said:

As does Tyrone Taylor, the CF he would presumably replace.  
I know it won't be a ton. But the Sox are already loaded with likely utility infielders,  AAAA outfielders, and Rule 5 guys.  Much prefer some A Ball lottery tickets.  There were overpays at the deadline last year for players having poor seasons with nowhere near his upside (although mostly on the pitching side).

I’d prefer lower level lottery tickets too. My only point is the Sox will be lucky to get players of the same caliber in return as Acuna and Baty but maybe they’ll get lucky.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

Right. Many here think I’m only negative with Robert but if you put yourself in another team’s shoes what’s there to like with this profile? If you can somehow revert him back to his 2023 form sure it’s worth the risk but how many contenders are looking for an oft-injured, underperforming reclamation project that’s being compensated handsomely over the next 2.5 seasons (if they even pick up the options)? I’m sure they’d take him but they aren’t giving up much in return imo.

Right. I think teams will definitely be interested but the Sox, overall, fumbled this. If only Hahn could have traded him 2 years ago when he traded like 8 other players at that deadline.

Edit: I remember seeing the Sox asking price as "moon high" or "shooting for the moon." Forgot exactly what phrase was being thrown around but "moon" was definitely part of what the description for what they were asking for.

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Right. I think teams will definitely be interested but the Sox, overall, fumbled this. If only Hahn could have traded him 2 years ago when he traded like 8 other players at that deadline.

That was the time to trade him. After his 2023 career year and after the Sox already traded everything else of value outside of Crochet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

Right. Many here think I’m only negative with Robert but if you put yourself in another team’s shoes what’s there to like with this profile? If you can somehow revert him back to his 2023 form sure it’s worth the risk but how many contenders are looking for an oft-injured, underperforming reclamation project that’s being compensated handsomely over the next 2.5 seasons (if they even pick up the options)? I’m sure they’d take him but they aren’t giving up much in return imo.

It is a superstar ceiling.  You can't teach that.  A lot of teams have to be better that their internal support and staff is way better than what the White Sox have got, and it looks like teams are out there strongly looking at bringing Robert in.

We keep talking about $15 million, but when the top of the line guys are getting $50 million plus a year, having three years locked down for that per annum may well appeal to someone who thinks they can reach him.  It's not a lot to the type of crowd who could really use a Robert.  The Mets sneeze away $15 million for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Right. I think teams will definitely be interested but the Sox, overall, fumbled this. If only Hahn could have traded him 2 years ago when he traded like 8 other players at that deadline.

Edit: I remember seeing the Sox asking price as "moon high" or "shooting for the moon." Forgot exactly what phrase was being thrown around but "moon" was definitely part of what the description for what they were asking for.

Two years ago was Getz over that winter.  If he had really come in and seen a LONG rebuild in place, not trading Luis the winter of 23/24 was his worst piece of negligence to this date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Two years ago was Getz over that winter.  If he had really come in and seen a LONG rebuild in place, not trading Luis the winter of 23/24 was his worst piece of negligence to this date.

I’m talking about the 2023 trade deadline, not the offseason.

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

It is a superstar ceiling.  You can't teach that.  A lot of teams have to be better that their internal support and staff is way better than what the White Sox have got, and it looks like teams are out there strongly looking at bringing Robert in.

We keep talking about $15 million, but when the top of the line guys are getting $50 million plus a year, having three years locked down for that per annum may well appeal to someone who thinks they can reach him.  It's not a lot to the type of crowd who could really use a Robert.  The Mets sneeze away $15 million for nothing.

This is his 6th year in the league and he’s made one all star appearance. He turns 28 this summer. At some point people need to stop pretending this guy is trout 2.0 and just call it like it is. Moncada and Eloy had “superstar ceilings” too but sometimes the talent level just doesn’t live up to its billing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

This is his 6th year in the league and he’s made one all star appearance. He turns 28 this summer. At some point people need to stop pretending this guy is trout 2.0 and just call it like it is. Moncada and Eloy had “superstar ceilings” too but sometimes the talent level just doesn’t live up to its billing.

He has a superstar season very recently.  That's more than either of the other guys can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said:

I’m talking about the 2023 trade deadline, not the offseason.

At the TDL those guys thought they had the winter for figuring out where the team was, before Getz slit their throats and took the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

He has a superstar season very recently.  That's more than either of the other guys can say.

This is essentially the Moncada argument from a couple years ago. Many were still saying he had superstar potential and he had a great season a couple years prior to that but it was clear he was no longer that player.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

This is essentially the Moncada argument from a couple years ago. Many were still saying he had superstar potential and he had a great season a couple years prior to that but it was clear he was no longer that player.

We know.  Some guys do, and some guys don't.  That's where we are now because Getz didn't sell at his peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2025 at 1:18 PM, southsider2k5 said:

Two years ago was Getz over that winter.  If he had really come in and seen a LONG rebuild in place, not trading Luis the winter of 23/24 was his worst piece of negligence to this date.

There was zero reason to not deal him after 2023 especially when you know you are about to nuke your roster and start from ground zero. There is no reason to continue to roster a superstar caliber player on a 110+ loss team for several seasons.

All I can remember about this was the handful of posters who were adamant that you couldn't trade him because he had 3+ years of control and was so valuable you would never get what he's worth. Well, that worked out great didn't it.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert's base stealing has improved dramatically, although that may be in part due to the Sox having him steal more.  Imagine if he could get hit like he did in 2023.  His OBP is okay, considering his low BA, and he's certainly taking more walks this year.  I just don't know what's wrong with his hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert will be like a Kikuchi situation. The swing data and defense/speed metrics looks good, so teams these days are so high tech they wont be bothered by the lack of production. last year Fedde was production and Kikuchi was data, and we saw what won.

On top of that Robert is a position player. Those dont become available. So i could see a (low) Top 100 prospect coming this way. Once there are a few bidders. 

No description available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...