Jump to content

The Worst Owner in Sports? The case for Jerry Reinsdorf


Kyyle23

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Texsox said:

There isn't an owner responsible for wins, that credit goes to the players. But loses fall in their laps. That's just the nature of the world.

Ehh, I want that to be true, but I don’t think it is.

Watch tonight. The first one to get to hoist the trophy will be the owner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Texsox said:

There isn't an owner responsible for wins, that credit goes to the players. But loses fall in their laps. That's just the nature of the world. In that regard that makes JR about the worst of the worst. Start factoring in things like market size and he looks even worst. 

Other owners only take action when an owner is accused of harassment or racist comments. If some franchise wants to be the Washington Generals the other owners don't care. So there really aren't many bad owners in their eyes. 

Sports are a weird business. I want someone to make a fortune in another business then spend all that further to make my team a winner. 

Which is why when the Sox won the World Series,  Konerko gave the ball to future Hall of Famer Frank Thomas, and not to Jerry...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players don’t control how much the owner budgets to drafting, development, analytics, INT scouting, or to the major league payroll. The players have next to no impact on team construction. Every successful rebuild requires outside acquisitions somewhere. 

Perhaps the owner isn’t responsible for individual wins on a day to day basis, but to suggest ownership has no impact on winning is silly. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Snopek said:

Ehh, I want that to be true, but I don’t think it is.

Watch tonight. The first one to get to hoist the trophy will be the owner. 

How much credit to we give JR for those Bulls trophies? 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Tnetennba said:

The players don’t control how much the owner budgets to drafting, development, analytics, INT scouting, or to the major league payroll. The players have next to no impact on team construction. Every successful rebuild requires outside acquisitions somewhere. 

Perhaps the owner isn’t responsible for individual wins on a day to day basis, but to suggest ownership has no impact on winning is silly. 

They have tremendous impact. But they won't receive credit. How much credit do you give JR for those Bulls trophies? We're agreeing the worst owner of sports has seven combined championships in two sports. 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Snopek said:

Ehh, I want that to be true, but I don’t think it is.

Watch tonight. The first one to get to hoist the trophy will be the owner. 

Sure, the owner gets that honor. But fan perception is that the owner is furniture who spends money. 

When a team wins, the fans will politely boo the owner at the parade. When they don't, fans actively call for a sale. Peruse any Mariners chat, and, while not the majority, there is a definite sample of people who barrel in and yell that the Mariners will never win until they get a new owner who spends money.

And they've got Julio Rodriguez under control through 2034 on a $119M contract, Raliegh through 2031 on a $105M contract, and Luis Castillo through 2028 on a $108M contract. The Mariners have 8 top 100 prospects in MLB rankings, and Bleacher Report just ranked their minor league system #1 in the game this September. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that fans generally don’t credit owners for winning, but that doesn’t mean owners never get recognized.

I’m not sure I even know what’s being argued here, which is what I get for butting in in the middle of it lol.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is fair to expect an owner to recruit a front office that can put together a winning program.  So that's basically the baseline of competency for me. He has consistently failed at that for decades. He's failed at what I believe is the minimum to pass. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kwolf said:

LOL. Poor guy I am sure he's a fine man, but if I am a Portland fan I am going WHY!!!!!!!

It was a completely different game in the 1980s.  As someone who lived through it, basketball revolved around the big center.  Michael changed the game 180 degrees, and no one really saw it coming.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

It was a completely different game in the 1980s.  As someone who lived through it, basketball revolved around the big center.  Michael changed the game 180 degrees, and no one really saw it coming.

Exactly true. The Bulls front office thought the kid could sell a few tickets. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

The Bulls even tried to trade the puck for...

Wait for it...

A center.

Who can forget the Will? Purdue era. And the fans chanting for Graaaaan Ville in the final moments of a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...