SoxFan1 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I'll take the .2003 for the higher average, higher OBP, and more RBI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I'll take the good one, not the bad one. Is there really any question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted March 7, 2005 Author Share Posted March 7, 2005 Some might go for the more Steals/More HR guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 04:32 PM) Some might go for the more Steals/More HR guy. Yeesh, for 3 hr and about 25 sb, when he's not getting on base? ROY candidate vs big disappointment? Open and shut, 2003. If anyone really thinks sb are THAT important, please explain, b/c that's plain nutty to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthraxFan93 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I want the 04 Spods.. cause SB is the only thing that matters :rolly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KWs OK for Me Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 Do you honestly think anyone wants 2004 Pods over 2003 Pods? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I'll take the bad player, just to be different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(KWs OK for Me @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 11:03 AM) Do you honestly think anyone wants 2004 Pods over 2003 Pods? Â obviously not. poll's 17-0... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 This is one lopsided poll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach61 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 If we get the bad yr, then all the folks that hated the trade can say "I told ya so." I picked it for them in case they are hipocrits and can't admit that they like to see things go badly so they can jump on the board and b**** about everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2HH Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I want to see the Pods we are seeing now. Â He's on pace to have like 325 triples and bat .825 with about 70 SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjm676 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 The Spring Training Pods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted March 7, 2005 Author Share Posted March 7, 2005 Wow........30-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 06:54 PM) Wow........30-1. Â You actually expected people to vote for his 2004 season...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 Make it 32-1 now. I picked the top because of the higher batting average and obp. I don't care how many stolen bases he has just aslong as we score enough runs to win at the end of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted March 7, 2005 Author Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 02:58 PM) You actually expected people to vote for his 2004 season...? I thought some might put more into the stolen bases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshPR Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 :headshake  No... I wanna see Pods hit .210 with 10 steals and 100 k's :rolly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 The one that doesn't suck. If there even is such a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 A little from A, a little from B... lol  If I had to pick one it would be 2003. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted March 7, 2005 Author Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(Queen Prawn @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 03:30 PM) A little from A, a little from B... lol If I had to pick one it would be 2003. That rhymed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelasDaddy0427 Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 This is a no brainer here. As long as he has the higher OBP even if he's not stealing as many bases he's at least on base to be able to score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUGGERNAUT Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 I expect something in between: 2005- .274 AVG, 12 HR, 68 RBI, .359 OBP, 63 SB, 60 BB Â More importantly wrt to Pods is R: 2003 100R, 2004 85R When I read the latest preview that BJ blog site I said to myself what is he smoking? Pods purpose for any team is to score runs. Despite his lack of success with the bat in 04 he still only suffered a loss of 15R. Does that person really believe Pods is going to score only 75R? If he puts up better than 550 ABs I think 85R is the floor for him. Â Likewise wrt to his being a LH bat his splits matter: 03 vs L:148AB, 333OBP; vs R: 410AB, 395OBP 04 vs L:147AB, 294OBP; vs R: 493AB, 319OBP Â Lee produced around 100 R the past 2 yrs for the Sox. Good for top 30. Pods 85R was good for 75th, his 100R in 03 was good for 26th. It's ridiculous to believe a healthy Pods want be a top 50 run producer in 05. His floor is 95R & his ceiling is probably 110 (top 20). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Mar 7, 2005 -> 01:03 PM) I thought some might put more into the stolen bases. Â Um, no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 Â I think we knew who won...may as well have a little fun with it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted March 7, 2005 Share Posted March 7, 2005 lol 1765 to 1. Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.