March 8, 200620 yr What the hell? The guy got to pitch one inning all spring. Ozzie must have a serious problem with Munoz. Anyway, I think it's safe to say that Lopez is gonna be the second lefty. Edited March 8, 200620 yr by Jordan4life_2006
March 8, 200620 yr Wow, so if he is outrighted, that means he lost his spot on the 40 man roster too, right?
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(Felix @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 01:37 PM) Strange, he seemed to do well in his stint in ST. He pitched in the spring opener and that was it. Ozzie must have a big time beef with him.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 02:38 PM) He pitched in the spring opener and that was it. Ozzie must have a big time beef with him. That much was obvious at Soxfest when he ripped him as something like gutless during the Q&A session. I don't remember Oz's exact wording, but it was blunt and that was his point. Munoz never had a chance.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 01:39 PM) That much was obvious at Soxfest when he ripped him as something like gutless during the Q&A session. I don't remember Oz's exact wording, but it was blunt and that was his point. Munoz never had a chance. I guess so.
March 8, 200620 yr "Ozzie must have a serious problem with Munoz." Yeah he has 'no guts', remember? :headshake
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 01:57 PM) "Ozzie must have a serious problem with Munoz." Yeah he has 'no guts', remember? :headshake I didn't take that as Arnie would pitch one scoreless inning in a week of spring games and get outrighted just because.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 01:37 PM) Wow, so if he is outrighted, that means he lost his spot on the 40 man roster too, right? i believe he has no more options left, so his career with the white sox organization is pretty much done
March 8, 200620 yr In order for Munoz to be outrighted, he had to clear waivers right? I am kinda shocked no one took a chance on him.
March 8, 200620 yr What the hell? The guy got to pitch one inning all spring. Ozzie must have a serious problem with Munoz. Anyway, I think it's safe to say that Lopez is gonna be the second lefty. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Indeed. Either Javier Lopez has pretty much won the job or KW is going to swing another trade. In order for Munoz to be outrighted, he had to clear waivers right? I am kinda shocked no one took a chance on him. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I believe so. I know that Munoz is out of options. Maybe KW did this now because he thinks he will be able to sneak Munoz through since other teams may not know what players they want to dump yet? Haha, Javier Lopez just made the team and whitesoxjosh just s*** himself. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Edited March 8, 200620 yr by SSH2005
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 01:37 PM) Wow, so if he is outrighted, that means he lost his spot on the 40 man roster too, right? From the article: The 40-man roster stands at 33. Not sure how this applies, but it seems to indicate the he would still be on the 40.
March 8, 200620 yr If you saw the seminar with Ozzie and Kenny at Soxfest, this really comes as no suprise.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 03:37 PM) If you saw the seminar with Ozzie and Kenny at Soxfest, this really comes as no suprise. I actually am surprised. I figured he would get a fair shot to prove Ozzie wrong.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 03:44 PM) I actually am surprised. I figured he would get a fair shot to prove Ozzie wrong. I am too. I thought Ozzie was sending him a message to try and prove that he has the guts to pitch. Ozzie never gave him that chance. I do not like it.
March 8, 200620 yr WTF? Munoz had a 1-2-3 inning with 2 K's and a fly out. He didn't get another opportunity and now we might lose him to another team. They should of at least given him a chance.
March 8, 200620 yr It said he was outrighted to Charlotte. My guess is that means he cleared waivers. I'm dissapointed because i think he was our best candidate. Not that I like any of our candidates. It seems as if Ozzie was negatively biased prior to camp.
March 8, 200620 yr It said he was outrighted to Charlotte. My guess is that means he cleared waivers. I'm dissapointed because i think he was our best candidate. Not that I like any of our candidates. It seems as if Ozzie was negatively biased prior to camp. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, I guess he must have cleared waivers then. I'm surprised that no team claimed him as a LOOGY at the very least.
March 8, 200620 yr QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 02:22 PM) Yeah, I guess he must have cleared waivers then. I'm surprised that no team claimed him as a LOOGY at the very least. This has to be one of those cases were KW was able to sneak him through waivers without anyone noticing, or in some way where people knew he wanted to keep him and would pull him back if someone made a claim, or something crazy like that. Heck, just from having thrown an inning in ST, people who need a lefty would have risked it.
March 9, 200620 yr QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Mar 9, 2006 -> 09:18 AM) It said he was outrighted to Charlotte. My guess is that means he cleared waivers. I'm dissapointed because i think he was our best candidate. Not that I like any of our candidates. It seems as if Ozzie was negatively biased prior to camp. So much for my prediction in that article I wrote. I don't know, maybe they want Munoz starting down at Charlotte and concentrating on that fully. But Lopez looks to be the winner for sure now, unless another trade is made. Let's just hope he can induce enough groundballs in that LOOGY role.
March 9, 200620 yr QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Mar 8, 2006 -> 04:18 PM) "should of" is like nails on a chalkboard to me. 75% of the general population do not realize that it's "should have". This and the improper use of than/then bother me greatly.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.