mrzo2733 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(SoxFan562004 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:17 PM) yeah he's good when healthy, but that's been a major issue, but Coop has turned people around before. Thorton is a good example KW seems to have a pretty good track record for moves like this (non-huge name bullpen moves). I would expect McDougal to do well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 02:27 PM) Does anyone actually think that Williams would be stupid enough to ship out McCarthy in this? Yes, I do. Kenny wants another title BADLY. I'll be sick if we lose Brandon. He's gonna be to us what Liriano, Verlander and Weaver have been to the Twins, Tigers, and Angels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AddisonStSox Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Bowden: "Kenny, it has to be either MacDougal or McCarthy. That is it." It happens all the time. The hapless Royals made similar requests in the Carlos Beltran deal. Things are par for the course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I can't believe the White Sox made a trade within their division! Unbelivable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:20 PM) Imagine that bullpen when healthy and the pitchers are "on." Wow. Asking for 3 pitchers to be "on" simultaneosuly has been a rarity for the 2006 Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 The more I think about it, I just can't see Anderson being moved with Pods goin gto center. The SOx know Pods defense is suspect and they know he can't play center. There's is no way that is part of the big plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(SoxFan562004 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:17 PM) yeah he's good when healthy, but that's been a major issue, but Coop has turned people around before. Thorton is a good example Somebody must have pointed him out as the guy they wanted to give up Lumsden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Jordan4life_2006 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 08:20 PM) Yes, I do. Kenny wants another title BADLY. I'll be sick if we lose Brandon. He's gonna be to us what Liriano, Verlander and Weaver have been to the Twins, Tigers, and Angels. I like McCarthy a lot, but he's nowhere near the caliber of those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhillegas Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 ummm....we wouldnt acquire macdougal unless we were about to trade someone from the pen, right? otherwise, bmac goes down, which isnt happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Lumpsden is gonna own us in a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Lumsden & Cortez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Lumsden & Cortez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Controlled Chaos @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:21 PM) The more I think about it, I just can't see Anderson being moved with Pods goin gto center. The SOx know Pods defense is suspect and they know he can't play center. There's is no way that is part of the big plan. Pods won't go to center. Oz already said that Pods wouldn't move there, and he knows that Pods is bad in left. He isn't going back to centerfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Lumpsden is gonna own us in a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Cooper + MacDougal? I think that'll work out damn well. Jenks, Thornton, MacDougal? Remember last season how people were complaining about how the Twins kept bringing all those great arms out of their bullpen? That's some serious gas in ours now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Welcome to Chicago, AJ Burn...I mean, Mike MacDougal. qwertyworld's take: Lumsden has a fair amount of potential, but the Royals should be able to do a little better if he's the only return. The White Sox would use MacDougal as a setup man. The Royals will likely put Ambiorix Burgos back into the closer's role. MacDougal's under the club's control for 2 more years, right? (This is his 6th year w/ ML time, but in the first 2 years he was a September callup -- I think...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Finkelstein @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:18 PM) I believe that Levine just said that it was Tyler and someone named Cortez for MacDougal? Jesus Fvckin Christ. Do we have ANY legitimate arms left in our system? You sure as hell can't trade McCarthy now. Lumsden was our best arm, and closest to the majors. We essentially traded an oft injured reliever for a #2, #3 starting pitcher? Yeah, that screams "win now," which translate to "we have the better end of the deal for several seasons, until Lumsden makes us regret the deal from every season thereafter." Now since Lumsden has departed, I'll admit I had dreams of him making Buehrle expednable in two seasons. sigh...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm just gonna go out on a limb and assume the Kenny won't fish us, that he will make a deal that leaves us in a better position to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm just gonna go out on a limb and assume the Kenny won't fish us, that he will make a deal that leaves us in a better position to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:23 PM) Lumpsden is gonna own us in a few years. So certain are you. He may have a good future, we'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LVSoxFan Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(G&T @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:23 PM) Pods won't go to center. Oz already said that Pods wouldn't move there, and he knows that Pods is bad in left. He isn't going back to centerfield. Um, didn't Pods play center prior to the Sox and isn't the whole point then putting Soriano in left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(spiderman @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:31 PM) So certain are you. He may have a good future, we'll see. Yeah and what about Braodway, Phillips, and Haeger? Not including our crop we drafted this year. I know they are a couple of years away, but as been said before, they are prospects until they do something in the majors. Remember some of our other can't-misses: Rauch, Kip Wells, Ruffcorn, even Baldwin to a point. Who knows what Kenny's got in mind, but In Kenny I Trust...my 2005 World Series DVD says so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 04:33 PM) Um, didn't Pods play center prior to the Sox and isn't the whole point then putting Soriano in left? No. Prior to the Sox, center played him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(LVSoxFan @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:33 PM) Um, didn't Pods play center prior to the Sox and isn't the whole point then putting Soriano in left? Look at how poorly he's been playing left. Do we really want Mackowiak-style defense out in CF every day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 01:35 PM) Look at how poorly he's been playing left. Do we really want Mackowiak-style defense out in CF every day? I'd vastly prefer Mack's defense in CF to Podsednik. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts