Jump to content

Sox get Mike MacDougal for Tyler Lumsden and Daniel Cortes


maggsmaggs
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(VAfan @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 04:30 PM)
The good news is that if he was a rookie in 2003, he's tied up by arbitration for at least a couple more years.

 

He only has Service Time of 2.104, so he has some arb years left (about the same as Cotts).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(rcpweiner @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:30 PM)
Anyone who's pissed about trading prospects ... can someone name the last one we got burned with trading? There's no Liriano's or Bagwell's in Kenny's past.

 

I'll paraphrase Allen Iverson here:

 

"Prospects. We're talking about prospects here. Prospects. Prospects, man. Prospects. Prospects. We're talking about prospects here."

We ain't talkin' bout major leagues. We talkin bout Prospects. Pros-pects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 04:39 PM)
i just realized that i have Macdogal in my fantasy league. So much for that and his saves. damn Sox.

 

The guy I play in my head to head league this week just picked him up last week. Guess it makes thing even since I have Turnbow.

Edited by AWhiteSoxinNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacD gets so much love from journalists, and I've just never understood why. I mentioned it somewhere else, but he seems to be the AJ Burnett of relievers. All the awe, not much of the production.

 

But you do get the injuries. I gotta give him that.

 

We'll see, though. If his talent is close to his billing, it'll be a fine trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:31 PM)
I'm all for winning, but come on, I'd like to have some sort of future.

 

I don't think I'll ever understand why people here spiff a brick when a "good" prospect is traded. If I had a dollar for all the SURE prospects that came into town and did absolutely nothing, I wouldn't need a job.

 

Prospects are nothing more than prospects until they do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BobDylan @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:40 PM)
I don't think I'll ever understand why people here spiff a brick when a "good" prospect is traded. If I had a dollar for all the SURE prospects that came into town and did absolutely nothing, I wouldn't need a job.

 

Prospects are nothing more than prospects until they do something.

 

Sing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got this from a Tigers board:

 

[MacDougal's] 3 year numbers vs DET:

 

18.2IP, 8/8 in Saves + 2 wins, 1.53 ERA, 3 ER, .226 BA

 

The ERA drops to 1.30 if you add in the 2 scoreless innings and the 1 save from this season as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...