Ok how about...

 

LT is a God...is that better?

 

Better and more accurate.

If the Cowboys win tonight, then I think it pretty much cements that the Cowboys and the Chargers are playing head and shoulders above everyone else in the NFL right now.

 

Seriously, Bears fans ought to be cheering on the Saints tonight.

 

 

Cowboys are for real but they would have a b**** of a time against our defense. To say they are "head and shoulders above everyone else" isin't exactly accurate.

And 1 more thing...J...E...T...S... JETS TAKE THAT! Just a couple more players on the Bills...and I believe they have a ton of cap space next offseason.

 

hail yes

 

The Bills aren't even completely done this year, and they are looking so good for next year.

Why is that?

 

Not like a random loss tonight changes anything.

 

Because....we...the Bears...I mean...you see...Dallas...Saints...um....I give up. I don't get it either.

Because....we...the Bears...I mean...you see...Dallas...Saints...um....I give up. I don't get it either.

I think it's fairly simple, and it's a matter of momentum. Right now, Dallas feels like they're on top of the world. If they ride that to the playoffs, while the Bears sit around debating whether Grossman is ok with 3 INT's per game, then Dallas is going to come into Chicago and find the Bears not ready, and they'll blow apart the Bears offense enough to win that game.

 

And I think everyone would probably prefer the Saints get the Bye rather than the Cowboys right now for that matter too.

Edited December 11, 200619 yr by Balta1701

It's going to be funny when the Cowboys lose their first playoff game this year.

It's going to be funny when the Bears lose their first playoff game this year.

It's going to be funny when the Bears lose their first playoff game this year.

 

Bears have been kings of the NFC all year, Dallas hits a hot streak and is suddenly the hottest s*** around.

It's going to be funny when the Bears lose their first playoff game this year.

I'd laugh, I highly doubt that happens though.

Edited December 11, 200619 yr by Rowand44

I think it's fairly simple, and it's a matter of momentum. Right now, Dallas feels like they're on top of the world. If they ride that to the playoffs, while the Bears sit around debating whether Grossman is ok with 3 INT's per game, then Dallas is going to come into Chicago and find the Bears not ready, and they'll blow apart the Bears offense enough to win that game.

 

And I think everyone would probably prefer the Saints get the Bye rather than the Cowboys right now for that matter too.

 

 

Sure Romo has had a little hot streak but Dallas aint the world beaters everybody is making them out to be. Dallas comes to Chicago in January and they're gonna get beat. The only thing that scares me is if the Bears get all overconfident like they did in the week leading up to the Carolina game in last seasons playoffs.

 

I'd laugh, I highly doubt that happens though.

 

 

I wouldn't put it past them with their history of one and done playoff appearances but I dont think thats gonna happen this year, especially if Grossman pulls his head out of his ass and starts playing some ball these last few weeks.

Wow.

 

Young has some wheels.

Please oh please draft a good kicker in the off-season Dallas.

 

Romo needs to get it going, Jones has been running the ball well, but we can't make a stop on D. That's gonna hav to change if we want to win.

'Bout time Dallas got stopped. I was so tired of hearing about the Cowboys.

The NFC is so mind bogglingly bad that the Bears and our embarassingly bad QB might not be enough to avoid ending up in Miami.

Woah, this can't be correct. Tony Romo and the best team in the NFC -- probably in the NFL, probably ever -- are losing to the Saints? To the Saints?

 

That's funny... Bears lose by four to a top four AFC team and are pretty much guaranteed to lose to Dallas in the first round. I wonder what that says if Dallas loses gets destroyed by an NFC team that probably isn't even in the top three of their conference.

Edited December 11, 200619 yr by CWSGuy406

The NFC winner is just going to get destroyed by San Diego anyways, so who cares.

 

TD Dallas, Rome to TO on a lucky missed pick, and it's a game again.

Woah, this can't be correct. Tony Romo and the best team in the NFC -- probably in the NFL, probably ever -- are losing to the Saints? To the Saints?

 

That's funny... Bears lose by four to a top four AFC team and are pretty much guaranteed to lose to Dallas in the first round. I wonder what that says if Dallas loses gets destroyed by an NFC team that probably isn't even in the top three of their conference.

 

The Saints are good and Reggie Bush is starting to look freakin awesome.

Woah, this can't be correct. Tony Romo and the best team in the NFC -- probably in the NFL, probably ever -- are losing to the Saints? To the Saints?

 

That's funny... Bears lose by four to a top four AFC team and are pretty much guaranteed to lose to Dallas in the first round. I wonder what that says if Dallas loses gets destroyed by an NFC team that probably isn't even in the top three of their conference.

 

New Orleans is a top 3 team in the NFC. With how explosive their offense is, I don't know how you couldn't say they are.

 

They'd get destroyed by an AFC team, due to how poor their defense is, but when their offense is clicking - like it pretty much has all year - they are a top 3 NFC team. That offense is just so.friggin.fast. I think Deuce is probably the slowest player they have, and he's the starting running back.

OMGAWDZ!@! ROMO WITH THE GREATEST TD PASS OF ALL TIME!! PUT HIM IN THE HOF!@!^$

OMGAWDZ!@! ROMO WITH THE GREATEST TD PASS OF ALL TIME!! PUT HIM IN THE HOF!@!^$

How about this one...

 

Tony Romo is NOT God.

New Orleans is a top 3 team in the NFC. With how explosive their offense is, I don't know how you couldn't say they are.

 

They'd get destroyed by an AFC team, due to how poor their defense is, but when their offense is clicking - like it pretty much has all year - they are a top 3 NFC team. That offense is just so.friggin.fast. I think Deuce is probably the slowest player they have, and he's the starting running back.

 

Yeah, I figured Dallas-Chicago as the clear top two, with the third spot more or less up for grabs, although if New Orleans pulls this one out, I'd probably put them third (maybe even second).

I would put Seattle 2nd in the NFC, maybe it's just me.

 

As I have specific questions about both Dallas and New Orleans

Edited December 11, 200619 yr by WHarris1

How about this one...

 

Tony Romo is NOT God.

 

Tony Romo is like Biz Markie. A one hit wonder.

 

I would put Seattle 2nd in the NFC, maybe it's just me.

 

As I have specific questions about both Dallas and New Orleans

 

With a healthy Alexander and Hasselbeck. No question.

 

Sean Payton=Coach of the Year

Ya...Sean Payton...FROM NAPERVILLE CENTRAL

I'm seeing

 

1. Chicago

2. Seattle

3. New Orleans

4. Dallas

 

Chicago's D is unreal...they can have bad games and still be outstanding defensively. When they are playing well, you're lucky to get into double digits.

 

Seattle is finally healthy, and assuming they stay healthy, they easily have the second best offense in the NFC in terms of talent...Hasselback is a top 10 QB, Alexander is a top 3 back (I figure LdT, LJ, and Alexander), and then they have quite a few good receivers too, to go along with a pretty damn good OLine. And I have them above New Orleans in the rankings because they have a respectable defense, so they aren't involved in like 38-34 shootouts.

 

New Orleans is next because their offense is so ridiculously good. Brees is a top 5 QB - probably is 5 - and he has about 14 different receivers he can throw to, and I don't think I'm exaggerating. Deuce and Bush are great in the backfield together too, because they compliment each other so well. Their defense is, however, horrendous, so basically if the offense has a bad half, they'll be playing some crazy catch up.

 

Dallas has been playing well recently, but Romo is inconsistent as hell. Given, he's a hell of a lot better than Bledsoe, but just because he can move around, and because he's had two great games doesn't mean he is a proven starter in the NFL. He's going to be inconsistent, as seen by tonight's game, and by last week's game against the Giants. Also, Jones and Barber are solid in the backfield, but are nowhere near Alexander or Bush/McAllister, and their receivers aren't nearly what Seattle's or New Orleans are either (though that is also due in part because of the QB). And the defense, while good, seems to be a bit overrated. From what I can tell, they can stop the run pretty well, but their secondary seems a little weak, and if they face a team like New Orleans or Seattle, they'll be in trouble. They're also in trouble against Chicago if Romo isn't picking up on the blitzes well and Grossman's having a decent day.