He is represented by Boras, which is why the Sox probably won't even talk to Patterson but I'd still love for it to happen.

 

Some team will give him the chance to start every day.

Bukvich and Jenks turn it into a clusterf*** (BTW, I've not been a Jenks fan since he pretty much lost his velocity and effectiveness. The fact he's now an "All-Star" actually makes me chuckle a bit).

 

His numbers are still pretty good and despite his velocity down, he still gets people out most of the time.

totally especially since hes been one of the best closers in the league this season. But yeah, good point

He has a lot of saves, but he hasn't been as dominating. His second half of 2006 wasn't very good. I hope we aren't seeing the beginning of a rerun. He never would have become the folk hero he became if he was throwing 93 in 2005.

I'm saying this one is still on Ozzie and Buckvic

I hope people opposed to trading Jenks hold this game in their memory. Without a 98-100 mph fastbal to compensate for command, he's just not as effective at 93-95.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if his velocity dips below 92 entering next season. Then what is Williams going to do?

 

Worry about his replacement later.

Let's get a run.

Well, good thing we pitched to Millar with an open base.

One more time please. 3 is the charm.

Edited July 3, 200718 yr by SoxFan1

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 2, 2007 -> 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

He is represented by Boras, which is why the Sox probably won't even talk to Patterson but I'd still love for it to happen.

Why? He's worse than Erstad.

Bukvich and Jenks turn it into a clusterf*** (BTW, I've not been a Jenks fan since he pretty much lost his velocity and effectiveness. The fact he's now an "All-Star" actually makes me chuckle a bit).

Jenks has still been incredibly effective this year even without the good gas. To state otherwise is just plain wrong.

He has a lot of saves, but he hasn't been as dominating. His second half of 2006 wasn't very good. I hope we aren't seeing the beginning of a rerun. He never would have become the folk hero he became if he was throwing 93 in 2005.

hasnt been as dominating?

 

Are you blaming that purely on his velocity, or his actual statistics and performance?

Ray has a 5.15 era which means easy 1-2-3 inning

Why? He's worse than Erstad.

A real 4th OF with legitimate speed and base running ability.

I hope people opposed to trading Jenks hold this game in their memory. Without a 98-100 mph fastbal to compensate for command, he's just not as effective at 93-95.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if his velocity dips below 92 entering next season. Then what is Williams going to do?

 

Worry about his replacement later.

Why? Because his WHIP and BAA have never been better in his career?

one down

can Uribe change his approach??

this team is f***ing pathetic

The strikeout kids cant make contact. Can we teach someone how to make contact. For the love of christ.

down to our last out folks

one out left

what a surprise.

that's it folk

Nice way to send Mark off.

Jenks has still been incredibly effective this year even without the good gas. To state otherwise is just plain wrong.

 

I agree but he has a history of not being good in the second of back to back games

f*** this game

way to put up a fight.