Jump to content

White Sox 2008 ZiPS Projections


RME JICO
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/...cago_white_sox/

 

The White Sox don't seem to have noticed it yet, but they're no longer even a heavy favorite to beat out the Royals for 4th place in the division. Like the team they beat in the World Series in 2005, the Astros, Kenny Williams and the rest of the Pale Hose seem to be looking at the team, hoping that if they squint hard enough, the team will look like 2005. The team will continue to suffer the next few years as a result of the organization not accurately assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the team during and after the 2006 season. Not much else to say - despite a few bright spots, this is a bad, old team, with a thin farm system (though not Astro-bad). Gio Gonzalez is one of the bright spots in the organization, but despite a solid 2007, the Met is an extreme pitcher's park in a very strong pitcher's league and Gonzalez would be best served with some serious time in the less hospitable Knights Stadium in Charlotte.

 

Name                     P  Age   AVG   OBP   SLG   G  AB   R   H 2B 3B HR RBI  BB   K SB CS 

Jim Thome* dh 37 .253 .378 .487 111 372 63 94 15 0 24 81 72 115 0 1

Nick Swisher lf 27 .263 .375 .483 146 518 89 136 31 1 27 83 88 127 2 2

AVERAGE 1B ------------- 1b ---- .280 .359 .487 ------------------------------------------

AVERAGE LF ------------- lf ---- .279 .364 .468 ------------------------------------------

AVERAGE RF ------------- rf ---- .278 .362 .469 ------------------------------------------

AVERAGE 3B ------------- 3b ---- .276 .359 .460 ------------------------------------------

Paul Konerko 1b 32 .262 .347 .474 150 549 77 144 29 0 29 101 68 108 0 0

Jermaine Dye rf 34 .265 .334 .494 136 502 75 133 29 1 28 95 48 114 4 1

AVERAGE CF ------------- cf ---- .273 .350 .432 ------------------------------------------

AVERAGE 2B ------------- 2b ---- .278 .350 .421 ------------------------------------------

Josh Fields 3b 25 .259 .334 .451 149 541 66 140 28 2 24 87 61 157 11 6

Carlos Quentin lf 25 .249 .342 .428 132 418 62 104 30 3 13 60 36 79 4 3

AVERAGE SS ------------- ss ---- .276 .342 .414 ------------------------------------------

AVERAGE C --------------- c ---- .262 .346 .410 ------------------------------------------

Joe Crede 3b 30 .263 .318 .438 113 395 50 104 21 0 16 61 27 50 0 1

Orlando Cabrera ss 33 .276 .330 .372 149 591 91 163 31 1 8 70 47 59 18 3

A.J. Pierzynski* c 31 .266 .311 .416 129 459 57 122 21 0 16 63 22 70 0 1

Juan Uribe ss 28 .250 .302 .427 149 511 64 128 25 1 21 76 35 94 3 7

Brian Anderson cf 26 .251 .313 .395 116 334 41 84 19 1 9 37 28 75 4 5

Jerry Owens* cf 27 .261 .325 .338 131 494 70 129 17 3 5 44 44 80 40 13

Danny Richar* 2b 25 .249 .304 .381 144 527 68 131 26 4 12 57 41 97 8 5

Scott Podsednik* lf 32 .262 .327 .345 96 362 56 95 20 2 2 33 31 62 29 13

Toby Hall c 32 .265 .300 .369 83 268 19 71 13 0 5 31 11 31 0 1

Pablo Ozuna lf 33 .271 .311 .349 60 166 22 45 8 1 1 15 7 18 8 4

_

_

 

Name Age ERA W L G GS INN H ER HR BB K

Bobby Jenks 27 3.21 5 2 69 0 73.0 62 26 6 26 73

Mike MacDougal 31 4.06 5 3 59 0 51.0 48 23 5 25 46

Javier Vazquez 31 4.07 13 9 31 31 201.0 200 91 26 50 172

Matt Thornton* 31 4.20 4 3 66 0 60.0 57 28 6 26 51

Ehren Wasserman 27 4.30 5 5 67 0 69.0 74 33 5 28 36

Mark Buehrle* 29 4.32 11 10 30 30 202.0 224 97 24 47 108

LEAGUE AVERAGE RELIEVER ------ 4.51 -----------------------------------------------

Scott Linebrink 31 4.70 5 5 70 0 69.0 75 36 12 23 49

Jack Egbert 25 4.72 9 10 30 28 164.0 180 86 16 67 101

Jose Contreras 36 4.73 11 11 28 27 175.0 194 92 20 58 96

Boone Logan* 23 4.86 2 2 70 0 63.0 67 34 8 28 46

LEAGUE AVERAGE STARTER ------- 4.90 -----------------------------------------------

Carlos Vasquez* 25 4.90 4 5 56 0 79.0 83 43 7 51 48

David Aardsma 26 5.08 4 4 63 0 78.0 78 44 13 35 70

Andrew Sisco* 25 5.64 3 5 59 7 83.0 86 52 13 51 73

Nick Masset 26 5.66 5 8 36 16 124.0 144 78 18 52 69

Gavin Floyd 25 5.87 6 10 29 26 161.0 189 105 29 69 98

John Danks* 23 5.90 7 13 28 28 151.0 169 99 33 56 121

Swisher added, Sweeney deleted.

Edited by RME JICO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The White Sox don't seem to have noticed it yet, but they're no longer even a heavy favorite to beat out the Royals for 4th place in the division. Like the team they beat in the World Series in 2005, the Astros, Kenny Williams and the rest of the Pale Hose seem to be looking at the team, hoping that if they squint hard enough, the team will look like 2005. The team will continue to suffer the next few years as a result of the organization not accurately assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the team during and after the 2006 season. Not much else to say - despite a few bright spots, this is a bad, old team, with a thin farm system (though not Astro-bad). Gio Gonzalez is one of the bright spots in the organization, but despite a solid 2007, the Met is an extreme pitcher's park in a very strong pitcher's league and Gonzalez would be best served with some serious time in the less hospitable Knights Stadium in Charlotte.

Oh, it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Leonard Zelig @ Jan 3, 2008 -> 09:07 PM)
The Sox must have a lot of double headers scheduled to fit 193 games into next sesason.

 

Disclaimer: ZiPS projections are computer-based projections of performance.

Performances have not been allocated to predicted playing time in the majors -

many of the players listed above are unlikely to play in the majors at all in 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always enjoy seeing these numbers, but... what a bunch of crap.

 

In 7 full season in MLB, Mark Buehrle has had a sub-4.00 ERA five times.

 

So, how's he going to do next year?

 

Oh... he'll have a 4.32 ERA and the second worst season of his career.

 

Yeah. Sure. Alright. <_>

Edited by scenario
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zips projections are rough to figure out. They take into account pure statistics but fail to take into account things such as intagibles. For example for the projections for MB are always pretty poor due the inputs into his equation. Doesn't overpower, doesnt throw hard, doesnt strike out a lot of guys, does give up a lot of hits, plays half his games in a hitter friendly park. Given those inputs its no wonder his raw projection would take on something like 11-11 with a 4.3 ERA. Problem is we all know MARK knows how to pitch, hes knows how to get guys out without throwing 95, knows how to get guys out with them putting the ball in play, etc. That sort of stuff isn't taken into account in zips. Furthermore, unless a player has a really bad year he usually doesn't come that close to his Zips projections. In 2006 zips was way off in terms of Thome, Konerko, Dye, AJ, Crede, etc in most offensive categories, they all had very nice years. In 2007 most of them had down years and looked very similair to their Zip projections. My opinion on Zips is that is good for the younger less proven, less established players. Its good in giving us at least a ballpark of what to expect of the unknown; fields, quinten, egbert, wasserman, richar, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(scenario @ Jan 3, 2008 -> 04:28 PM)
I always enjoy seeing these numbers, but... what a bunch of crap.

 

In 7 full season in MLB, Mark Buehrle has had a sub-4.00 ERA five times.

 

So, how's he going to do next year?

 

Oh... he'll have a 4.32 ERA and the second worst season of his career.

 

Yeah. Sure. Alright. <_>

 

Projections generally aren't very nice to Buehrle. They don't take kindly to finesse pitchers.

 

Player Spotlight - Mark Buehrle

ERA W L G GS INN H ER HR BB K ERA+

Optimistic (15%) 3.49 15 8 33 33 227 230 88 22 40 134 133

Mean 4.32 11 10 30 30 202 224 97 24 47 108 107

Pessimistic (15%) 5.38 7 11 25 25 159 198 95 23 43 74 86

 

He usually finishes better than the mean, and they throw this out there for you too. And he has essentially finished as bad as that pessimistic, as 2006 was really, really bad.

Edited by witesoxfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they're certainly bullish on Danks and Floyd aren't they.

 

And if Linebrink put up that type of ERA, I don't think there would be many happy White Sox fans about that signing. Unfortunately, I think something around there is a real possibility (although maybe not THAT bad).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...