September 20, 200817 yr QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:31 PM) It's even funnier with the picture they are using. I get a strange feeling of deja vu... didn't they do this with Danks a while back?
September 20, 200817 yr Author QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:36 PM) I get a strange feeling of deja vu... didn't they do this with Danks a while back? They used a pic of Sisco for him.
September 20, 200817 yr Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. Edited September 20, 200817 yr by shipps
September 20, 200817 yr QUOTE (shipps @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 05:02 PM) Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that?
September 20, 200817 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? yeah that's where you just tell the person, don't be such a moron. You get fired for much worse stuff.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 01:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? If it were in print, possibly. A headline misprint is a pretty big boner. Thousands of dollars and lots of time to stop the presses and rerun. An agency I worked for in River North a while back almost lost an account over a reprint gaffe. A webpage, highly unlikely—it's a 30-second code fix. Embarrassing, maybe. Terminable, not on the first time at least.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? Like I said, its not a huge deal but cmon.If they did it from lack of knowledge of the team they should not be working for the site.If it was just a brainfart than no they shouldnt even get in trouble for it.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? Considering our conversation the other night and your hangup on proper grammar and spelling, this is hilarious.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (shipps @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:02 PM) Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. You obviously haven't met the internet people for teams before.
September 21, 200817 yr Do the Sox run that site exclusively or does MLB have a hand in it? All team sites are essentially the same so I wonder what control each team has.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (G&T @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 10:28 AM) Do the Sox run that site exclusively or does MLB have a hand in it? All team sites are essentially the same so I wonder what control each team has. I know the content is run by a combination of the team's web, marketing, and PR departments (or at least, that's how it is for the NBA; I'd imagine its similar for the MLB). Not sure about the design though. Edited September 21, 200817 yr by Felix
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (Felix @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 10:33 AM) I know the content is run by a combination of the team's web, marketing, and PR departments (or at least, that's how it is for the NBA; I'd imagine its similar for the MLB). Not sure about the design though. Thanks
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 11:21 AM) Considering our conversation the other night and your hangup on proper grammar and spelling, this is hilarious. I just said it bothers me. I'm not looking to fire anyone over it, ha.
September 21, 200817 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 12:03 PM) I just said it bothers me. I'm not looking to fire anyone over it, ha. UR feyrd
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.