October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:42 AM) Crawford was a 6.8 WAR player this season. That is outstanding. (Konerko was a 4.2) He's worth $20M per. By this logic guys like Adrian Beltre and Jose Bautista are worth 20 million. I love the WAR stat. But no way in hell Crawford is worth 20 million.
October 8, 201015 yr I'm not surprised that the Sox are "targeting" Crawford. Why wouldn't they? The trouble is, like many other posters have said, the Sox most likely cannot compete with a few other teams out there that would spend a lot more to get him. The Sox may very well make an offer, and they may actually offer more years than they typically do. But, I can't see them offering more than $12-$15 million per season. A few other teams out there wouldn't hesitate to offer $18 million+ a year for 4 or 5 years. Someone else mentioned that Dunn would be a nice consolation prize. Absolutely, but he'd want to play 1st base. Maybe the Sox will go after him as their new 1st baseman. That would probably mean Paulie's not coming back though. Can you imagine how small Dunn would make the Cell look? Wow.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (South Side Fireworks Man @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 06:18 PM) Has Crawford ever even played RF? His arm isn't very well suited for it and I seem to remember years ago he was reluctant to play CF. Even if the Sox felt he could play RF despite his arm I'm not sure if Crawford would be that receptive to doing it. If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. Edited October 8, 201015 yr by Dick Allen
October 8, 201015 yr Is Crawford old, washed up or coming off serious injury? No? Then we will not get him.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (Brian @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 10:40 PM) Us: Carl, we offer you 5 years at $60 million. Carl: No Us: Oh well, we tried LOL!!!! Totally true
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 06:52 AM) If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. AAAAHHHHHH!!!! The stupidity in that comment is ridiculous. I wish nothing but the worst on all of the Guillens. Edited October 8, 201015 yr by Milkman delivers
October 8, 201015 yr Since it came up, if Paulie's not coming back, who would be the leading suitors for him?
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 03:46 AM) By this logic guys like Adrian Beltre and Jose Bautista are worth 20 million. I love the WAR stat. But no way in hell Crawford is worth 20 million. In addition, Crawford's high WAR number is largely due to his fantastic defense. That's fine and dandy, but the White Sox are absolutely starved for offense, and those are the numbers they should be most concerned with, especially if it costs 20% of your payroll.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (LVSoxFan @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 04:15 PM) Since it came up, if Paulie's not coming back, who would be the leading suitors for him? Boston, LA teams, Arizona, Twins (if Morneau can't recover)
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:52 AM) If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. Oh hell no....that means we're going after Torii Hunter
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:22 AM) Boston, LA teams, Arizona, Twins (if Morneau can't recover) Wouldn't it be fun to see him and Thome bash our brains in next year? Ugh
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 05:24 PM) Wouldn't it be fun to see him and Thome bash our brains in next year? Ugh I'm sure Bobby Jenks or whoever is pitching would continue to give him fastball after fastball.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (sircaffey @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:21 AM) In addition, Crawford's high WAR number is largely due to his fantastic defense. That's fine and dandy, but the White Sox are absolutely starved for offense, and those are the numbers they should be most concerned with, especially if it costs 20% of your payroll. Crawford was actually really good offensively this year, and you may be able to assume more offense from him moving from a great pitchers park to a hitters park. He actually is beginning to remind me more and more of Johnny Damon as he goes along, but I think he's better too. Edited October 8, 201015 yr by witesoxfan
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:27 AM) I'm sure Bobby Jenks or whoever is pitching would continue to give him fastball after fastball. If they can keep it up over his hands, they will be fine.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 04:31 PM) We'll land Crawford in 12 years. so true
October 8, 201015 yr I'd be willing to bet that Crawford wouldn"t sign with the Sox even if they were the highest bidder.
October 8, 201015 yr Haven't the Sox done this before, throwing the name of a big name free agent out there for the media to jump all over? Inevitably, the Sox offer is rebuffed but management can say that "they went hard after that guy". This is more of a PR stunt than anything else.
October 8, 201015 yr Has it occured to anyone, through all the anger, that PART of the reason we fall short on free agents is that the team is willing to pay what they see as the value of the player, and not overpay? That its an organizational philosophy? Because I find that much more likely than the idea that they do it for publicity. This team has been upper echelon in payroll for 5 seasons in a row now, its not like they don't spend money, so it seems silly to try to "fake" interest in signing people. People here seem to be letting their frustrations with the results of 2010 color their judgment. The whole publicity stunt thing just doesn't make sense.
October 8, 201015 yr "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games."
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:02 PM) "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games."
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 12:29 PM) Has it occured to anyone, through all the anger, that PART of the reason we fall short on free agents is that the team is willing to pay what they see as the value of the player, and not overpay? That its an organizational philosophy? Because I find that much more likely than the idea that they do it for publicity. This team has been upper echelon in payroll for 5 seasons in a row now, its not like they don't spend money, so it seems silly to try to "fake" interest in signing people. People here seem to be letting their frustrations with the results of 2010 color their judgment. The whole publicity stunt thing just doesn't make sense. I'm sure it's a thought that crosses their mind. I doubt Kenny would have someone throw a rumor like that around, I don't see him wasting his time with stuff like that but I'm sure that if they did miss out on someone they would want people to know that they tried to save grace a bit, just look at the Torri Hunter situation.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:10 PM) I'm sure it's a thought that crosses their mind. I doubt Kenny would have someone throw a rumor like that around, I don't see him wasting his time with stuff like that but I'm sure that if they did miss out on someone they would want people to know that they tried to save grace a bit, just look at the Torri Hunter situation. Well sure, if they do fall short, they want to spin it that way. That's after the fact. But the idea that it is the prime motivation just seems ridiculous to me.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 02:02 PM) "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games." Crawford hit 19 homeruns this year.
October 8, 201015 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 05:41 PM) If they can keep it up over his hands, they will be fine. The same Paul Konerko that was the best fastball hitter in the majors?
October 8, 201015 yr Losing Quentin and Konerko and replacing them with Crawford does not sound like a good idea. I love the people that say the White Sox are cheap yet they can have a $100M while being cheap. Do they want Crawford, I am sure they do. Will they overpay to get him, no. Will Sox fans be pissed that they did not overpay, yes. I am really glad they did not sign Hunter, Fukodome and Alphonso Soriano, so I will give them the benefit of the doubt.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.