December 19, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 01:01 PM) It is free attention, which is the #1 reason he states most of the things that come out of his mouth. He is a highly paid troll. He also hates being called dumb, which this article specifically states. Im sure he will talk about it today
December 19, 201312 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 01:04 PM) He also hates being called dumb, which this article specifically states. Im sure he will talk about it today They were talking about it already in the crosstalk section! He denied calling Derrick a villain but maintains that he's a detriment to the team right now. edit: Rose doesn't want to go through rebuilding and lose the team they currently have assembled, but last year his camp was saying that they need to get Derrick some support. Edited December 19, 201312 yr by StrangeSox
December 19, 201312 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 01:01 PM) It is free attention, which is the #1 reason he states most of the things that come out of his mouth. He is a highly paid troll. Haha, whatever.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 09:49 AM) Mac comes back at noon today to explain his absence He's come and gone more times than the Undertaker. After awhile, I just stopped caring.
December 20, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (Brian @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 09:53 AM) He's come and gone more times than the Undertaker. After awhile, I just stopped caring. Taker still has the WM streak, what does Mac have? WHAT DOES HE HAVE?!?!? NOTHING!!!
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 09:49 AM) Mac comes back at noon today to explain his absence Depression, rehab, or both?
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 09:55 AM) Taker still has the WM streak, what does Mac have? WHAT DOES HE HAVE?!?!? NOTHING!!! Maybe Scott Hall would be a better comparison.
December 20, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 10:05 AM) Depression, rehab, or both? fishing
December 20, 201312 yr I've never been happier to get indoor canadian soccer on ice and/or gambling talked at me though my radio again.
December 20, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (woods of ypres @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 12:57 PM) really? No i was joking. I tuned in late, but it seems like rehab from what they are talking about
December 20, 201312 yr I think if someone comes to you saying they need to go to rehab, you can't fire them. They have ADA protections.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 03:54 PM) I think if someone comes to you saying they need to go to rehab, you can't fire them. They have ADA protections. That's true as far as it goes, but an employee still has to regularly show up for the job he's been hired to perform. The employer has a legal duty to reasonably accommodate, but after awhile, it gets unreasonable to expect the employer to continually endure a series of lengthy absences, as has been the case with Mac.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:04 PM) That's true as far as it goes, but an employee still has to regularly show up for the job he's been hired to perform. The employer has a legal duty to reasonably accommodate, but after awhile, it gets unreasonable to expect the employer to continually endure a series of lengthy absences, as has been the case with Mac. I'm definitely not an employment lawyer, so I don't know the specifics, but based on what he said today, Mac approached management and said he needed to enter rehab. He wasn't just randomly not showing up to work before that.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:06 PM) I'm definitely not an employment lawyer, so I don't know the specifics, but based on what he said today, Mac approached management and said he needed to enter rehab. He wasn't just randomly not showing up to work before that. This was not the first occasion when Mac left his show to deal with his problems, just the most recent. Also, from what I heard today, he told his program director off but good right before asking for this rehab leave. In light of that, it was generous of the Score to allow him to go, and it may have been well within its rights to fire him. He seemed to acknowledge that when I was listening.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (Brian @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 09:53 AM) He's come and gone more times than the Undertaker. After awhile, I just stopped caring. I helped him with one of his "comebacks". I helped him after a knee surgery.
December 20, 201312 yr Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA. He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows. Edited December 20, 201312 yr by Jenksismybitch
December 20, 201312 yr Author QUOTE (ptatc @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:35 PM) I helped him with one of his "comebacks". I helped him after a knee surgery. I heard he is a pretty good guy outside of the ring when you get to know him
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:38 PM) I heard he is a pretty good guy outside of the ring when you get to know him An outstanding individual. We had alot of fun in the clinic. He actually bought lunch for the entire clinic (pizzas) after his discharge.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (ptatc @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:35 PM) I helped him with one of his "comebacks". I helped him after a knee surgery. I don't believe you, dead people don't need surgeries. QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:36 PM) Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA. He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows. I understand giving him a 2nd chance but I swear this is like 5 or 6, it's ridiculous at this point.
December 20, 201312 yr QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:36 PM) Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA. He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows. Actually, alcoholism IS a protected disability under the ADA, and although one's present use of illegal drugs is not, a history of past addiction problems (even addiction to illicit drugs) is also. Of course, if an employee can't show up for work or get his job done because they are wasted or hung over, those ADA protections won't save them, which is to the point I was making before.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.