3 k's ADA

I was assuming Flowers going forward bats 230, so i think that 50 is a pretty fair number, considering de aza's return to the mean.

Hahahahahahahaha f***in Hawk.

If they ruled he swung, then not sure what the review is for.

That was the worst call I've seen in a long time.

Edited April 20, 201411 yr by Quinarvy

Idiotic challenge

Done at 50 points. Out of curiosity, how many points would it take for you not to take the bet? Feel like I came on a little strong with 50.

 

I wouldn't have gone under 40

Whaaaat the crap is going on...are they saying he...like...leaned into the pitch? Like Crede in Baltimore several years ago?

Whaaaat the crap is going on...are they saying he...like...leaned into the pitch? Like Crede in Baltimore several years ago?

 

No saying he swung and got hit

Whaaaat the crap is going on...are they saying he...like...leaned into the pitch? Like Crede in Baltimore several years ago?

 

No, they said he swung at the pitch on the appeal, which he clearly didn't.

Hahahahahahahaha f***in Hawk.

What's he saying? I'm on Gameday.

Ok then? Let's just play baseball

These umps have been horrible this year.. Strike zones have been bad and a lot of the reviews have been bad

I think they were looking to see if the ball hit the bat. Then it would be foul. There is no way he swung although that appears to be what was called.

I guess I'm missing something. The ball clearly hit SOMETHING. So even if he swung it would have to be a foul ball, would it not? Under what interpretation of a rule can a ball hit something and be a swing-and-miss?

You gotta wonder why they made check swings non-reviewable.

Was that even reviewable

Was that even reviewable

 

Only whether or not the pitch hit him.

I guess I'm missing something. The ball clearly hit SOMETHING. So even if he swung it would have to be a foul ball, would it not? Under what interpretation of a rule can a ball hit something and be a swing-and-miss?

If the ball hit his hand and he swung it's still a swing and a k. He clearly didnt swing though.

Edited April 20, 201411 yr by Rowand44

I guess I'm missing something. The ball clearly hit SOMETHING. So even if he swung it would have to be a foul ball, would it not? Under what interpretation of a rule can a ball hit something and be a swing-and-miss?

The ball hit him but he swung is what they are calling.

feeky, that thrown bat has to be an omen. that is not good.

Hmm....okay.

De Aza has been rung up 4 or 5 times this year when he clearly didn't swing.

I guess I'm missing something. The ball clearly hit SOMETHING. So even if he swung it would have to be a foul ball, would it not? Under what interpretation of a rule can a ball hit something and be a swing-and-miss?

 

Yeah I don't understand either. He either got hit by the pitch or it was foul.. I think the umps said he swung and it hit him so there fore he is out. But a lot of people say the hand is part of the bat so no matter what it was at least a foul ball

De Aza has been rung up 4 or 5 times this year when he clearly didn't swing.

Ya he really has. Crazy.