Kyyle23 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 i saw the flinch last night, that is hilarious. QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 11:09 AM) Also, no commentator mentioned the malaise with which the Eagles receivers seemed to play with last night. Jackson and Maclin both looked completely disinterested. Both of them got roughed up last night. The Bears played extremely physical on both sides of the ball for the entire game, I know that the Eagles did not expect that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Ha, I didnt see that. Sanchez is twice that guys size too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 11:31 AM) Ha, I didnt see that. Sanchez is twice that guys size too. the funniest part is right after that, he realizes the play is still going and he needs to block. He then gets flagged for holding and negates a run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 11:38 AM) That game last night was a thing of beauty. It's incredible how well this scheme works against Vick, and how incredibly good the coaching staff is looking right now. Our slow start is on Martz for abandoning the run, again, to start this season. Don't forget the fact that Omiyale made it into the lineup again. The difference with him out is night and day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 10:10 AM) Here's the kicker though...if the Bears lose next week to the Lions...that makes the Bears 5-4 on the season. 7 games to play...getting to 11 wins means the Bears need to go 6-1 in their last 7 games, including 1 game on the road at Lambeau. That's do-able against their schedule...but it's ugly. The Bears do not want to be in that boat. The Bears do not need 11 wins to get in. 10 will do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Peyton Manning's injury strikes again. The Dec. 4 Colts-Patriots game has been removed from the Sunday night slot and moved to noon. No replacement game named yet. (Bears are at home vs. KC that day, so I highly doubt that gets moved) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasox24 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:30 PM) Peyton Manning's injury strikes again. The Dec. 4 Colts-Patriots game has been removed from the Sunday night slot and moved to noon. No replacement game named yet. (Bears are at home vs. KC that day, so I highly doubt that gets moved) I have tickets to that game, so that would be awesome... But yeah, don't think Bears-Chiefs would be a good enough match-up for the SNF game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (dasox24 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 01:43 PM) I have tickets to that game, so that would be awesome... But yeah, don't think Bears-Chiefs would be a good enough match-up for the SNF game. I just checked the schedule, there are some way more enticing options for NBC that week. Packers/Giants, Lions/Saints, Bengals/Steelers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 I just checked the schedule, there are some way more enticing options for NBC that week. Packers/Giants, Lions/Saints, Bengals/Steelers Without looking at the schedule, I'm thinking that at least one of the teams in each of those matchups might already be scheduled for the maximum allowable primetime games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 03:16 PM) Without looking at the schedule, I'm thinking that at least one of the teams in each of those matchups might already be scheduled for the maximum allowable primetime games. If there's a limit for that, the Bears have to be close too, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Fox protected that Packers/Giants game. So that one isn't moving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Patriots release Haynesworth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:42 PM) Patriots release Haynesworth have to imagine Ochocinco isnt far behind, he hasnt caught anything all season. Thats two busted trades for the Pats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:23 PM) If there's a limit for that, the Bears have to be close too, right? I thought the limit was 5, but I could be wrong. The Bears are currently at four. They have already played 3 and still have the X-mas night showdown at Lambeau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:47 PM) have to imagine Ochocinco isnt far behind, he hasnt caught anything all season. Thats two busted trades for the Pats I honestly thought he was gonna have a great year with Brady. Whoops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:59 PM) I honestly thought he was gonna have a great year with Brady. Whoops. Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 02:59 PM) I honestly thought he was gonna have a great year with Brady. Whoops. i dont know when it happened, but at some point ocho lost his confidence. he drops so many balls now it is ridiculous. he used to make insane catches routinely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 Packers plan stock sale next week. So if anyone wants to be part owner of the Packers! Packers stock sale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 I just checked the schedule, there are some way more enticing options for NBC that week. Packers/Giants, Lions/Saints, Bengals/Steelers Lions/Saints would be quite the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 03:11 PM) Lions/Saints would be quite the game. 150 pass attempts. I'm actually hoping we get that game in the first round of the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 03:07 PM) Packers plan stock sale next week. So if anyone wants to be part owner of the Packers! Packers stock sale. How much stock would I have to buy to force a trade of Aaron Rodgers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 03:20 PM) How much stock would I have to buy to force a trade of Aaron Rodgers? I think you would have to buy them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 03:20 PM) How much stock would I have to buy to force a trade of Aaron Rodgers? You receive no voting rights or anything of substance with the stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted November 8, 2011 Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 04:54 PM) You receive no voting rights or anything of substance with the stock. It's essentially a decoration to hang on the wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 8, 2011 Author Share Posted November 8, 2011 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Nov 8, 2011 -> 05:03 PM) It's essentially a decoration to hang on the wall. And an expensive one at that. All though I have to say, I would totally do it for the Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts