They tried to get him to give up a year of free agency last year. He said no. I don't remember the $$... but I don't think that was the deal breaker. I'm pretty sure it was the FA issue.
The extra year of FA wasn't even the big thing. There was a big chunk of the money that wasn't guarenteed, and was a team only option.
Which raises the question, why not a guarantee on the money?
Just because he is a pitcher?
They surely have no problem giving guaranteed deals to Konerko, Maggs, etc.
If Konerko's money would have been incentive based, he woulda made about 10 cents last season.
But instead they are going to let their young ace get away because they won't guarantee the money or shell out a big contract.
Indians have Sabathia signed to a deal, A's have Zito with a deal, yet the Sox will be going to arbitration with Buehrle. Is something wrong with this picture?
Two words. Jaime Navarro. But seriously, this team is paranoid of signing pitchers long term, and if you think about it, what if we had been on the hook for contracts to guys like Jack McDowell, Wilson Alvarez, Alex Fernandez, and/or Roberto Hernandez. We would be the Detroit Tigers right now handicapped by horrible contracts. The problem is since we have a small budget mentality, we have to be ultracareful about who we give long term deals to. That being said, I want to see something get done with Mark, but I am not holding my breath either.
While I see your point 2k4, Mark Buehrle is certainly no Jamie Navarro....
The busts have outnumbered the successes for the Sox, but you can't just let Buehrle get away. I, like many, tend to believe he is special and with the way he throws and changes speed to get people out rather than relying on heat and a bunch of junk, shouldn't be worried about arm problems.