NUKE_CLEVELAND

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 08:30 PM) Ya, 17 games into the season and Rowand is batting .226. Let's s*** on him. Atleast Rowand has put together 1 good season in his career unlike Crede. Dumbass thread. Not entirely. When I made the Crede Line thread he started picking it up the very next day. Maybe there's something to this whole thing.

QUOTE(danman31 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:45 PM) Yep, that's the one. Also, the Star Wars one. There is a jedi molestation scandal, lol. "Yes they deserve to die!!! I hope they burn in hell!!" OMG I love Chapelle Show. In keeping with the sports theme how about "Great Moments in Hookup History"? That was priceless. They got the dude from those NFL films videos as a narrator and they show dave trying to score in a bar dodging perils like "the cock block".

QUOTE(danman31 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:40 PM) Haha, the funny thing is I posted that with you in mind. I thought so. LOL!

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 08:46 PM) Will he ever shut up? He might have to in October. Lots of loud whining and complaining will probably get you kicked off of a golf course.

QUOTE(danman31 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:35 PM) I would just like to say that this thread should never die to show up all the former Crede haters. I will gladly eat crow for my crede bashing if he can play well. It's all about the W's dude.

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:07 PM) Fricking biters, I've been calling Ozzie 'Scarface' since he got here. Yesterday,. they said the got an email suggesting we call Carl Everett "Dinosaur', hmmmmmm wonder wher they got that idea? "JOO GONNA TAAAA ME? JOO GONNA NEED AN ARMY JOO GONNA TAAA ME!!"

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 12:16 PM) Does there have to be statistics up the ass to say why we're 12-4? I think it has to do with one word: attitude. Stats can't do s*** for a winning attitude. That's exactly the reason we're winning. The atmosphere surrounding this team is just the same as it was in 2000. Everyone's loose, there's no ill will in the clubhouse & there's no pressure. Combine that with the high level of skill and balance of various skills and you have a winning team.

QUOTE(The Critic @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 10:18 AM) Ahhh, just give Crosby to the Rangers. New York's the only market that matters anyway, right? I don't trust either set of morons to get a deal done anytime soon. I saw some links to that story and didn't even click on them. I'll believe a deal when I see it, and I'll think about the NHL again when they finally drop a puck. I'm so sick of this whole situation. We should be enjoying the Stanley Cup playoffs right now, not thinking about a possible first step towards maybe finding some potential, hypothetical middle ground that could, if all things fall into place, perhaps pave the way towards an eventual settlement. Personally I wouldn't mind if the NHL collapsed totally and a new leauge was formed to replace it.

QUOTE(danman31 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 02:49 PM) Yeah, it's awesome. I love Sameul L. Jackson when he gets mad. And then Chapelle's knock off Jackson. Oh man, has me rolling. You mean the phoney beer commercial? LOL!!!!!! I remember that one. "SAMUEL JACKSON!!!!!!! ITS MY BEER!!!!!!!!!!"

QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Apr 13, 2005 -> 09:22 AM) Some things you just don't do and expect people to just pass it over. One is ANY kind of threat against a President, and the other is just saying "bomb" on a plane. I for one am glad that some forms of our "freedom" are questioned and are investigated. Oh yeah, and it is crap. I totally agree. Total and complete freedom to do whatever you want to and when you want to without any rules or restrictions defines one word....... The word is anarchy.

QUOTE(Wong & Owens @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:20 PM) You're a hypocritical douchebag. You started this by claiming "you just don't get it, do you?" Like I need a schmuck like you telling me what I get and don't get. You're absolutely right.......it's patently obvious that you don't get it so there's no need whatsoever for me to talk about it further.

QUOTE(Reddy @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:18 PM) my point... My point.

QUOTE(Reddy @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:13 PM) nuke we all realize you're 'anti-liberal' but you dont need to be so flaming about it... seriously... I didn't start the flaming here but I'm more than happy to respond in kind. At least Kip can debate without resorting to personal attacks and you dont see me talking nasty to him.

QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:10 PM) So none of those groups are interested about the issues around which they have been formed? I doubt it. The point I'm trying to make is that they've outlived their usefullness and the agenda's they now promote ( affirmative action and other forms of preferential treatment for women and minorities ) now run contrary to the premises they were founded on which was equal rights and protections for all. If they held true to their ideals they would be gushing over a black woman who has made it this far.

QUOTE(Wong & Owens @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 03:09 PM) I'm sorry, I didn't know you were such an expert on those organizations. Maybe you could enlighten us with some of your in-depth research, which could perhaps back up your moronic, paranoid, blanket comments. Calling Clarence Thomas an "Uncle Tom" is not a "moronic, paranoid, blanket comment"? I dont know who has more credibility issues the NAACP with their petty, stupid personal attacks or you. You can pucker up and kiss my ass......b****.

QUOTE(Punch and Judy Garland @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 05:12 PM) Bevington? Just kidding. It's nto goign to be a popular choice but as a 22 year old, I'll go with Torborg. That 1990 team was as fun of a team as I've seen and I think he was good with young players. He was kind of the early for of Ozzieball in Chicago Bevington? HAH!!! I used to love watching his face turn red when he'd argue with the umpired. Looked like a big fat stop sign.

QUOTE(mac9001 @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 01:52 PM) Baby steps, you gotta have a base to start from. Eventually they'll argee on a strong constitution. Remember, we didn't get it right our first time around either. Excellent point.

QUOTE(Wong & Owens @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 02:55 PM) She's a black female lawyer without the support of either the NAACP or the NOW. She's a real winner I bet. You dont get it do you? These are organizations who are not there to promote issues of blacks and women, they are there to promote a leftist agenda and thats about all. The fact that they do it under the guise of helping blacks and women is shameful. The NAACP is also the same organization who called Clarance Thomas an "Uncle Tom". This judge should wear a lack of support from these organizations as a badge of honor.

QUOTE(RockRaines @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 02:28 PM) Note to ESPN, please dont talk about us anymore. Thanks -The White Sox Yeah, that's a curse against us.

QUOTE(Wong & Owens @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 02:25 PM) She sounds like a real advocate for the people: The following organizations have taken an official position on this nominee: Organization Position ADA Watch/National Coalition for Disability Rights Opposes Advocates for the West Opposes AFL-CIO Opposes Alabama Environmental Council Opposes Alliance for Justice Opposes Alliance for Retired Americans Opposes American Association of University Women Opposes American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Opposes American Lands Alliance Opposes American Planning Association Opposes American Rivers Opposes Americans for Democratic Action Opposes Americans United for Separation of Church and State Opposes Amigos Bravos Opposes Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Opposes Black Women Lawyers of Los Angeles Opposes Buckeye Forest Council Opposes California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League Opposes California Association of Black Lawyers Opposes California Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO Opposes California League of Conservation Voters Opposes California National Organization for Women Opposes California Women's Law Center Opposes Californians for Alternatives to Toxics Opposes Center for Medicare Advocacy Corporation Opposes Chinese for Affirmative Action Opposes Citizens Coal Council Opposes Clean Air Council Opposes Clean Water Action Opposes Clean Water Action Council Opposes Coalition of Labor Union Women Opposes Coast Alliance Opposes Committee for Judicial Independence Opposes Committee for the Preservation of the Lake Purdy Area, AL Opposes Community Rights Counsel Opposes Congressional Black Caucus Opposes Defenders of Wildlife Opposes Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. Opposes Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund Opposes Earthjustice Opposes EarthWINS Opposes Endangered Species Coalition Opposes Environmental Defense Center Opposes Environmental Law Foundation Opposes Equal Justice Society Opposes Equality California Opposes Families USA Opposes Feminist Majority Opposes Friends of Hurricane Creek, AL Opposes Friends of the Earth Opposes Georgia Center for the Law in the Public Interest Opposes Gray Panthers Opposes Great Rivers Environmental Law Center Opposes Hurricane Creekkeeper Opposes John Muir Project Opposes Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. Opposes Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the Bay Area Opposes Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Opposes Legal Momentum Opposes Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund Opposes Mineral Policy Center Opposes NAACP Opposes NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Opposes National Abortion Federation Opposes National Association of Women Business Owners - San Francisco Chapter Opposes National Bar Association Opposes National Center for Lesbian Rights Opposes National Committee to Preserve Social Secuity and Medicare Opposes National Council of Jewish Women Opposes National Council of Jewish Women - California Opposes National Council of Jewish Women - Los Angeles Opposes National Council of Women's Organizations Opposes National Employment Lawyers Association Opposes National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association Opposes National Health Law Program Opposes National Organization for Women Opposes National Partnership for Women and Families Opposes National Senior Citizens Law Center Opposes National Urban League Opposes National Women's Law Center Opposes National Women's Political Caucus - California Opposes Natural Heritage Institute Opposes Natural Resources Defense Council Opposes New Mexico Environmental Law Center Opposes Northwest Environmental Advocates Opposes Oilfield Waste Policy Institute Opposes Omni Center for Peace, Justice and Ecology Opposes Pacific Institute for Women's Health Opposes People for the American Way Opposes Planned Parenthood Federation of America Opposes Planned Parenthood Golden Gate Opposes Planned Parenthood Los Angeles Opposes Progressive Jewish Alliance Opposes Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice Opposes San Francisco La Raza Lawyers Association Opposes SEIU Local 99 Opposes Service Employees International Union Opposes Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States Opposes Sierra Club Opposes Sierra Club Southern California Opposes Southern Appalachian Biodiversity Project Opposes Stonewall Democratic Club, Los Angeles Opposes Union for Reform Judaism Opposes Unitarian Universalist Project Freedom of Religion Opposes Valley Watch, Inc. Opposes Washington Environ mental Council Opposes Western Land Exchange Project Opposes Western Law Center for Disability Rights Opposes Wild Alabama Opposes WildLaw Opposes Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Opposes Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project Opposes Based on that they pass my litmus test. They need to be approved and post-haste.

QUOTE(Y2HH @ Apr 22, 2005 -> 11:58 AM) Not to mention that because of Jane Fonda (and what she represented), lines and lines of hippies were lined up waiting for our soldiers to return so they could stand in a line and throw things and spit at them in the name of "freedom", because they were opposed to a war in which most of these solders were drafted into. It took quite some time...but Jane got to feel what it was like to be spit on for no good reason. And I love every second of it. Defend Jane Fonda?! BRAVO!!!!!!! Congratulations...........you get it.

ALL HAIL THE KING OF SPAM!!!!!!!

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 10:32 AM) http://www.local6.com/entertainment/4400956/detail.html FWIW, the vet doesn't regret what he did, even as he faces prosecution. I saw an interview given by this guy and he's proud of what he did..........and I'm proud of him. This b**** deserves far worse than she got.

QUOTE(AirScott @ Apr 21, 2005 -> 05:19 PM) I don't know how to word this right, so I'll just give examples, like on Tuesday night, when Timo Perez was playing in RF for Dye, Timo batted 5th. or when Pods was out, and Ozuna and Timo always hit leadoff, or today, Harris played instead of Iguchi and hit in Iguchi's usual number 2 spot. is there any reason behind this, or did he already make 162 lineup cards, and just has to fill in the names every day? Quoth Ozzie. "I maa da fooking lineup an we winna game with the bes recor in da AL"

Kansas s***ty can't mess with us. I predict a sweep.