southsideirish

You get over it you dumb f***. The first post wouldhave given you an idea of what this thread was about. Then you decide to waste more time posting. Yeah your a smart cookie.

What are your guys' majors? I am majoring in network administration and I will graduate next semester. I am looking to get my masters. Anyone have a suggestion as to what I should go for?

I think if something was ever passed you would have to make some modifications to those vehicles to fit the rquired specifications. Of course you would be given enough time do make those modifications as the vehicle manufacturers do as well.

I have PMd the mods and have received zero response. Maybe this will get a fast response. I know a little thinking would have been involved with you there, so I forgive you for not realizing that that would be the case. You seem to be able to find my posts and threads very quickly, responding to them as soon as I post them. Stalking again are we?

If you don't read them then why the hell are you here posting away? That makes sense now doesn't it? Now I don't want to fight. I want an honest answer as to why I was suspended and you were not. That is what I want. Until then I will continue on. How did you even find a thread as soon as I started it? You still stalking me? It didn't take you long to get here and make your first post.

I could care less what you bet on. If it was that I would post or start a new thread about this then you were right. I will do it again and again until this is resolved. My confrontational style? At least I have admitted when I was wrong. I can accept another person's opinion as just that. An opinion. I have no need to attack it as you do. As far as adding to the board? Do you mean like you? Because you supposedly know players and coaches? But hey your not supposed to share pesonal information according to you. So who cares if you even do. Oh but that personal information you always share is just so well docmented that it makes it okay all the time. I find it wierd, the extremes you go to to know all about the players lives. Wives names, where they live, their agents names. I mean are you really that involved in players that you need to know all that? Are you living through them? Does it make you feel better that you know celebrities or star players? What is with that? You always talk down to people. It is your nature. Deal with it. I love how you did not bother to answer one thing in my last post that had to do with you miss queenie.

Please, you have done it a numerous times. Attacking and talking down to people is your nature in case you have not noticed. IF all you do is question it then you have an odd way of showing it. You started off by calling it the stupides analogy you have ever seen, or something to that affect. You obviously did not take it as it was meant or you would have read what I was stating. Obviously you can compare it to things as I just did, as both these things have the similarties in which I was comparing. Round and round we go. It is nothing to do with innings eating thing because I never ridiculed, called you or your post certain names, or talked down to you. Those are things that only you do all so well. YOu don't agree with a lot of posters and a lot of times with you it does turn into name calling. Besides the mods and a select few posters you are not very well liked around here, and I will just leave it at that. Peaople just don't like getting involved in arguments with you because you because of how you act. I think you better look back at the threads and see who started saying what was going over whos head. That would have been you. You also started off attacking, or umm "querstioning", the analogy I gave by calling it the stupidest analogy you ever seen. Obviously if you intent was just to question and not attack there are better ways of wording it. Correct? Would we agree on that? Alrighty then! As far as there being no proof and making no sense let me ask you this. If the players say that they took something unknowingly wouldn't that be proof that they took something? They would be admitting they took something, but did so unknowingly. Alrigthy then. Capn12 I am sorry I will not PM her. One time I tried to work things out with her a while back and all she did was bring it to the board. Saying I was crying about everything. However, I was only trying to make peace with her. I will never PM this person again. Plus she watches where I am at on the board. I have proof of this as yesterday I was PMing another poster, whom I consider a friend, about a matter on Christianity and she accused me of recruiting people into my "pity party," whatever the hell that meant. What is that all about? Isn't that a little bit wierd? Just a little bit stalkish? It is freightening that someone is that wrapped up with you that they would resort to such behavior. I need to know why the hell I was suspended while the other was still allowed to post away. I need to know what I did that was so bad, but the other poster was still able to go at it. I will keep bringing this issue up until it is resolved. I am so sick of this favortism that (a) certain mod/mods display around here.

I knew it wouldn't take long for sum1 to giv irish a serve. hilarious!!!!!!!

Nothing like beating a dead horse. You're not making yourself look any better by pulling this s*** back up. I dont really care any hlonger cheat. That was ridiculous what happened. I did nothing to get suspended. I was clearly just stating my point of view. If someone doesn't agree that is one thing, but to get to attacking someone is another. That is what happened. I am sorry that you feel the way you do, but this is really f***ed up. This is taking favortism to the extreme.

You are exactly right ss2k4. It was pointless. Yet I was the one temporarily suspeneded while the other member keeps on posting! Great job! Look over the posts and see who was attacking whom. I think your aggressions are terribly miss directed and you need to stop playing favorites. Miss queenie has to get off her high horse and realize that her opinions are not the only ones that matter and everyone is entitled to post what they think. Just becuase miss queenie doesn't agree with something does not give miss queenie the right to attack that person's post or the poster themselves. THis is bulls***!

Rex also stated that the players could say they have taken them unknowingly and it would be hard to punish them in that case. That is where my analogy came in. It wasn't to debate anything that Rex said. It was to show that you can get punished for something you did even if you did it unknowingly. If they ever to were admit they took steroids unknowingly then there would be the proof, the admission that they took them. The unknowingly part is where my analogy comes in. The point of my post, once again, refers to the matter that you can get punished for doing something unknowingly. I posted it for that reason. I am completely sorry that this has all gone over your head.

Rex specifically said that the players may have done so unknowingly and said it would be hard to justify a punishment in this case. Perhaps because they were saying they did it unknowingly,not because there is not proof that they did it. You seem to have left that whole part out of your post. Hmm, I wonder why miss queenie? Rex did specifically say they may have taken things unknowingly becuase the trainers gave it to them as a supplement and not as a steroid. This is where I "BAM" jumped in with my analogy. Not where you want to make stuff up and put in my analogy and make it seem like a bunch of nonsense. I can't see why this is all going over your head. I also took Rex's post to mean even if they did admit to taking steroids they would admit it under the pretense that they took them unknowingly in which case my analogy makes perfect sense. Where did I ever say that it was not on the topic being discussed? I never once stated that. Instead of always arguing with me and making my statements read the way you want them to read you should just take them as they are. Not as you want them to be.

My analogy does not require proof becuase I am not talking about proof. Storming in? I thought I came into this thread the same way everyone has. Wow, storming? At least I announce my presence with authority!!!

Correlate what? My analogy is simlpy stating that you can be punished for doing something unknowingly. That is all. Pity party? Dragging people in? What are you talking about miss queenie? WOW!

Where did I state that you can punish someone without proof? Was that my argument? I don't believe it was. If that is found anywhere please let me know because then this would be flawed. MY point was you can get punished for doing something unknowingly. That is all. That was all the point was. Not about proof. The analogy was not made for that, so if you are looking into too much then maybe you are looking for way too much. Hopefully this will get through to you as I have posted this about a million times to you already. You mean acting like you while posting? That doesn't seem to be too hard miss queenie. My pee pee slapped? That is very adult like!

Wow a legit subject on how my analogy was flawed? But then you have no concept of what the analgy is being used for? Then when it is shown to you what it was used for you can admit your mistake, you just keep going round and round spweing out nonsesnse? OK, if that is a legi subject and a legit argument fine by me. Have fun with it all you want. My pee pee is here waiting to be slapped. Go on miss queenie get on your high horse once more and tell everyone how flawed these opinions are.

In this case or any case you can be punished for unknowingly doing something. In this case, I believe, is refering to because they did so unknowingly. Over and out. ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM I know your feeling the breeze going over you now!!!!

Another? Wow, the I guess only one person can make judgements around here to what is flawed and what isn't. Bow down to the queenie!!!!

I think I just posted why I deleted it. Accidents happen. This seems to be going way over your head. I did indeed post to Rex. where did I ever say I didn't? Rex states: There you go. For the last time, that is what the analogy was for. Go to it!!!! This should be fun.

yes you can actually punish someone for doing something without knowing. There have been instances where guys have been arrested for having sex with underaged girls, even though they had an ID that said they were 21 and they were dancing in a club that does not allow people under 21 inside. They did not know that a girl was under 18 or 17, but that does not get them off the hook. They still did the dirty deed. Just because you don't knowingly do something does not get you off the hook for doing it. It may look better to everyone else around you, but it doesn't get you off the hook. You do the crime you do the time.

That analogy was never used to prove that point. That analogy was only used to prove that you can punish someone for doing something unknowingly. I believe my original post was directed at Rex for stating how can you punish someone for dong something unknowingly. That is all. Again, I will try my best to be clearer in the future about the point I am trying to make. I am sorry that you missed it. It is not absent from the thread, since you quoted it it is still there. I accidentally clicked on delete instead of edit, however for you I will put it back up. Have fun with this post!

The point is, in case you missed it, is that you can punish someone for not knowing. Just because they did something unknowingly does not make the whole situation ok. That was the point of the analogy. Never stated that there was proof or not. Sorry you missed that point. I will try to clarify better in the future.

of course I am, you have a problem with that?

I understand Santiago, but Bernard and Velarde? Come on!

Jeeze what gave that one away?