bmags

So, he could basically figure it out the next four inning and have chris sale's line. Shouldn't you have waited a bit longer?

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 6, 2016 -> 01:11 PM) There's definitely been some pushback from various places about how Sanders really came across in that interview. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/07/upsho...banks.html?_r=0 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie...4b0a506064d8df5 That's putting a lot of words in his mouth that he didn't say.

I completely endorse at least experimenting with this in April and May. Continue to be impressed with Albers especially after his return last year.

QUOTE (shysocks @ Apr 6, 2016 -> 09:48 AM) Keuchel last year. And if Gray counts, so do Carlos Carrasco and Garrett Richards. I love it.

That was a fantastic article, really great insight from Rodon and fun stuff on different things coaches have him try in warmups to help his extension. Thank you for posting.

I forgot how many ace pitchers Abreu has homered off of.

Reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where Jerry has to choose between dating a girl or continuing to make HELLOOOOO jokes

QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Apr 5, 2016 -> 08:15 PM) I'm really warming up to the idea of drafting Elliott if he's there at 11. I like Langford, but Elliott's probably the safest player in this draft and is the best RB to come out since Peterson. I'm not willing to reach on Robinson or Jackson. Conklin might be a G or RT as is Decker. I'm sure he's really good, I have no desire to draft a RB at 11. The difference between a really great RB and and good one seem to have marginal difference on winning you a football game.

Caucuses themselves are very low turnout and in very small pop states. It wouldn't make a dent in the difference

Ugh. I can't stay up anymore. Hope to wake up to a victory.

Ugh. I can't stay up anymore. Hope to wake up to a victory.

Come on Alex. Give us a warm welcome.

Avi still just can't seem to recognize what a bad pitch is.

And I'm sure this means a no decision.

Let's get him second time through

I love Q

Todd Todd Todd

I don't know, I feel like I've complained more about the MLB not forcing the warm weather teams to host the first week, Not sure I can then complain about the start times. Like - I find it dumb that LAD played SD. Have two cold weather teams come out for the first week to hopefully continue to thaw.

Yeah it's not really close to me either. I worry I only would get peanuts.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseb...0405-story.html Bratwurst, Hot Dogs, Peanuts, Bacon • Michigan and Lake at 11 a.m. Michigan and Monroe at 12:10 p.m. • Clark and Monroe at 2:30 p.m. • Wacker and Adams at 4 p.m.

I don't know. If your last name is Frasor it deserves to be mispronounced.

I miss pablo ozuna.

Honestly if you are a great NFL scout and reporter that should be self-evident, that he constantly finds it necessary to snipe others that are able to do what he does without having to have failed in an NFL front office tells me a lot.

Regardless of whose fault it is, until we discover we have someone who can steal bases as a strength I'd prefer we stop being aggressive.

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Apr 5, 2016 -> 11:49 AM) The same scenario exists with most politicans, imo. It baffles me how they can make so many promises and so many people can believe it, when structurally it is damn near impossible to do something about it. For example, Trump, how is he going to deport 12M (or whatever the number is) illegal aliens. Seriously, how is he going to do that. Are we going to have national guards going door to door and marshall law to deport all these people? Its about the only way I can see it happening? And no, I don't support his policy. I do support a strong border as I believe it is integral to our security but I also support legal immigration and I also realize that whatever the cost (both actual cash outlay as well as emotional damage to up-root people, the vast majority who have worked hard and done things that ultimately support our economy and our infrastructure and who risked everything to come here for the pure hope that American brings) far outweighs what it would cost to create a program to legalize those existing people (while strengthening the borders to ensure that we can go forward with properly vetting and determining an appropriate process for legal immigration). Now when it gets to that extent, I don't have the simple answer. Well, to be honest, I think this is largely fine. We ask these people about a large range of topics, many of which will never change. But there's also a possibility that an event could occur pushing something to the forefront, and it's a worthwhile exercise to know where they stand on it. I don't think Sanders necessarily needs to have a fully fleshed out single payer system, that doesn't bother me. This bothers me more. If you are going to basically accuse all of your contemporaries of being in the pocket of big banks, and that wall street is by its very nature corrupt, and then can't speak beyond platitudes on that, that's almost...insincere! That almost seems like something a politician would do. I can't see Warren stumbling over that stuff. Also, I love how the interview seems to push that, hey, maybe dodd frank actually does things. "How would you do this" "well I would use Dodd Frank"...Dodd Frank, the useless piece of legislation bought and paid for by banks and pushed by corporate democrats?