bmags

I’m worried we are in a Bosa situation. Really wish Bears will back down.

Tell you this, board would not have been happy about it.

No they will be announced on 7/2/19. Signings begin to happen pre-period beginning, but plenty still happen throughout year. Look at Victor Victor.

Hunter Schryver sounds like a Law & Order detective.

You can't trade future intl money so it's 2018 money.

Yes, all of this.

Nothing has reaffirmed the rebuild strategy for me more than the struggle the angels have had to make the playoffs. Just did not have enough resources to add enough to overcome a series of unlucky seasons. Have been drafting wayyy better though, so they will be better soon. Unknown if trout is there for it.

Definitely going Med Dare Ohss until I'm corrected.

Glad he got the chance in the bigs, clear he couldn't hit that next gear. Wish him well.

My guess would be that the college relievers could be successful but may be the more highly volatile, up and down relievers as they have less experience changing things up as hitters see them more. Converted starters are more consistent because they have worked through trying to make their stuff play up when tired, when going through a 2nd/3rd time through, etc. Just a hunch, but it makes sense to me.

This isn't really a question. That is the gamble. The sox have invested a bunch into college relievers and presumably because they expect a return. Perhaps they are expecting the high leverage relievers to be the converted starters and just have these be the depth so you don't need to pay for a MR on the market or during season, but this is the play.

Yeah, I think Bears need to fold. While I understand the argument they shouldn't have to pay for production they didn't get, the league has increased suspensions for more and more on-field play, which is increasing potential for players to miss guarantees due to decreased playing time. The teams get to vote on those rules, the players do not. The team should take the risk, not the player, especially on the defaulted slotted contracts. If a guy has a history of it? By all means try to add it into a FA contract, but this is silly.

Yeah I think that's a factor of wanting it to translate to all time.

Right, the link I included was just looking at Hahn's tenure (2013-today)

There is no reason to promote a HS in their first season. This is the most ball they’ve ever played. This year is just to get them acclimated.

https://www.thebaseballgauge.com/history.php?tab=trade_partners&first=2013&last=max Cool tool that allows you to see how often teams trade with one another. the above link I set to just look at Hahn’s tenure. Lotta AZ and Oakland, no trades with the Mets or Indians. Interesting to me was the all time most frequent partners were Cincinnati and STL, and wasn’t even that close.

I enjoy that his teammates were hugging him to support his hammy.

Sox fans aren’t good at this stuff because they compare our system to what it used to be vs comparing it truly to all other franchises. I don’t think anyone has the time for that but after the year of injuries I’d probably take Yankees or brave for under 25 talent.

I have been interested in seeing it workout. If the zig where others zag stuff where you could see an advantage for the Sox, building an organic costcontrolled bullpen could allow more leeway to go after position and SP upgrades. that said, the huge weakness I see in it is the raiding of the group in rule 5. Are eel going to lose interesting starters or position players because we have to protect a huge number of prospect relievers?

Thanks. I would not be surprised then if Hamilton does not come up even though he would deserve it.

So I have thoughts on this but will try to be short: - our small class this year I think is an example of our limitations STILL in latam market. Those guys (300k and below) can go anywhere and so relationships matter, we still are rebuilding so many relationships and creating new ones. When money isn’t a factor it makes it hard. Compare that with Preller who has lived in LatAm for years. - because of that limitation, Sox probably rightfully have instead opted for using the money toward trades for spects. So it’s a good news/bad news thing for me. Sox are pursuing probably their best strategy available but I think it’s still an example of how the org is trying to dig itself out of the wilder crater.

Is Hamilton/burr rule 5 eligible this nov? I wonder if Sox just keep them off 40 through year to keep space for all these RP prospects we have.

Between the light 2018 signing class and teams like orioles suddenly spending on latam, suddenly felt like the market for our spending allowance got better.

Yeah this guy should be in majors this year. It’s not like we won’t have a difficult rule 5 decision too. If he looks bad, easier to pass him through, if he looks great, protect him.

I swear that every Friday night sox minor league numbers are on fire, and then saturdays they go ice cold.