Milkman delivers

Buy her a case of K-Y jelly. Nothing says Valentine's day like a whole lot of butt lovin'.

What exactly was the "I Told You So" award?

QUOTE (GREEDY @ Feb 3, 2009 -> 10:26 AM) Just in case anyone cares: Abreu sucks in RF. I would have to think Quentin would move to RF if Abreu replaced JD. Abreu is both a veteran and a good friend of Ozzie's. He will remain in RF no matter what.

Ha, I don't think I even post enough anymore, nor much inflammatory stuff to be up for this. I see my reputation still precedes me.

QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 09:42 AM) Except his arm was down and not around his head so that doesnt always work. Whether or not the arm is behind or in front of the QB's head is not written anywhere in the rule. It was probably a fumble, but it did appear that maybe his arm had started the forward movement when he got hit. At any rate, not reviewing that play was completely inappropriate. I wouldnt be surprised if the NFL didnt review it only because it was so close and they didnt want their replay system scrutinized. The officiating is NOT why the Cardinals lost. That being said, it was attrocious. The roughing the passer was bulls***, there were two non-calls on what were probably intentional grounding on Roethlisberger, there was a potential clip on Hightower on the Harrison run back, the running into the holder was iffy, and the hold on Ward was iffy. Also, is there still the halo rule for punt returns? I dont remember if they removed it or not but if they didnt it should have been called in the 4th. And Harrison is a dumbass and is lucky he wasnt tossed. That was almost a punch I also noticed all of these things. From what I can remember, it was the worst called Superbowl I've ever seen. It reminded me of every single Patriots Superbowl win with every call going against the opposing team and every break going for New England.

So, anyone else call in sick today?

QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 08:07 AM) Ray Park will probably be redeeming as Snake Eyes. But only because he will not talk I assume you agree on Raul Julia, though.

QUOTE (SoxFan101 @ Feb 2, 2009 -> 04:13 AM) Now it might be a bad movie, but streetfighter bad is just hard to do. As bad as Street Fighter was, it still had the extremely memorable performance of Raul Julia to make it worth seeing. I doubt the GI Joe movie has an actor of that caliber to carry it. I believe at the time of the filming, Julia knew he had only a short time left on Earth, so he just had fun with the role and overacted the hell out of it. And it was great. I still enjoy watching that movie today because of his performance in it.

QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:51 PM) That was another classic game. That 4th quarter was incredible, by my God, the refs were terrible. I can't say it was classic because of the officiating. If the refs didn't suck so much, that would have easily been one of the best Superbowl games I've ever seen.

QUOTE (whitesoxbrian @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:39 PM) What do you want them to review? His arm was hit and the ball was jarred loose...all while the ball was behind his head. That ball was steady in his hand enough on the follow through for it to be an incomplete pass. Either way, the simple fact that it wasn't even reviewed, added with the rest of the awful officiating, is outrageous.

QUOTE (knightni @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:33 PM) Nope. His WRs keep getting the MVPs. Is that a real argument or are you joking?

Does this second Superbowl in his first five seasons put Roethlisberger into the HOF already?

QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 10:10 PM) Very happy the Cardinals came back. They indeed showed they could hang and they most definitely showed that they belonged. Why was there no review on that last play by Warner though? The refs had money on Pittsburgh.

What a terrible ending to the biggest football game of the year. At least it ended the way the entire game went, with the Cardinals getting f***ed in the ass by the officiating crew.

QUOTE (zenryan @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 05:07 PM) I'd say the majority of the casual UFC fans would rather watch the fighters just stay on their feet. Nothing annoys me more than hearing people groan as soon as the fight hits the mat. I also like submissions. I hate when a fight goes to the judges, in MMA and boxing.

QUOTE (lostfan @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 12:35 PM) What does "andate" mean? I know what the rest means. I think he told him to walk through s***. Andar is to walk, and the "te" at the end makes it reflexive.

QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 01:06 PM) I was really hoping we’d stop hearing about Phelps soon. No such luck. We'll stop hearing about him very soon. This is extremely minor news, and we won't hear anything about him again until the next Olympics. I mean, who gives a s*** what he's doing? I don't even give a s*** about him during the Olympics. It's f***ing swimming.

QUOTE (MHizzle85 @ Feb 1, 2009 -> 12:08 PM) I'm sure glad I didn't put any money on this card, otherwise I would of been drinking myself silly. GSP put on probably the most dominant performance I can remember. #1 P4P? Yep, book it. Time for BJ to go back to 155 and clean house, time for GSP to do the same at 170. I'm gonna shut up about Machida being boring now. With that being said I still think Rampage is the #1 contender, but if he gets caught by Jardine then by all means it's Machida's shot. Jon Jones could be something to watch. Card overall was decent. Now if you'll excuse me i'm gonna go back to bed to avoid anyone else yelling GSP! at me. I'm sure glad I didn't buy that PPV, and instead watched it online. Penn looked pathetic, and the first three matches were boring as hell. I'm guessing Machida is Japanese, although he was apparently born and raised in Brazil. Can anyone confirm this? By his looks, he seems asian, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is. I'm basing this on his name, his father's name, and the fact that he's trained in Karate and Sumo.

QUOTE (LosMediasBlancas @ Jan 31, 2009 -> 04:05 AM) I'll take a healthy Joe Crede over Juanito any day, on offense and defense. You best learn how to time travel, then.

QUOTE (Jenks Heat @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 05:20 PM) Juan Uribe had a better White Sox career than Joe Crede. It's true, but most will never admit it because Crede had about 3/4 of a great year, from right before the World Series through about the halfway point of the following season.

QUOTE (bschmaranz @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 02:54 PM) I think Samardzija being on the list is more ridiculous then any Sox omission from the list. That's the reason the Cubs are always talked about trading s***ty prospects for great players. The media blows their prospects, even though they're garbage, and they get more in return.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 29, 2009 -> 11:26 PM) You are missing the most important part: So no i dont think it was 1 man taking an unfair advantage, I think it was an entire system created to make money off them taking drugs. I think honor and fairness are relative terms. I think doctoring a baseball is worse than taking steroids, other people do not. How do you rectify what is "worse" is just opinion? I have never said cheating is fine, I just said it is up to the sport itself to catch and stop the cheater. Not to implicitly allow it and cover it up. Ive never said taking an unfair advantage to the field is right, Ive asked why is it right to ban some people for cheating but not others. If we are going to ban 1, we should ban all. And if we are going to accept 1, we should accept all. How is that not fair? It seems like you're saying that two wrongs make a right. Baseball didn't punish the guys while they were cheating, and due to this, they should allow them into the HOF. Mistakes were made and players weren't punished in the past. It's not too late to rectify that situation, and punish them by denying them entry to the HOF.

QUOTE (ptatc @ Jan 29, 2009 -> 10:49 PM) I agree. Bonds stuck to the script that BALCO told Marion Jones and Tim Montgomery. Tell anyone who asks it's flaxseed oil and arthritis medication. The others finally admitted this and Bonds may eventually. If people really want to stick their heads in the sand and believe it thats fine. He may not ever be convicted. That's fine too. But anyone who saw Bonds before and after he began taking them knows what he was doing and so did he. He knowingly cheated the game and he will not be in the HOF. By the way it's not just him. McGwire, Sosa and others should fall in the same category. They made thier millions because of it. Good for them. But don't let them recieve the highest honor of baseball, which does have a morality clause to get in. And that's what will keep him out, Soxbadger. You can argue all you want that he's eligible, and he is, but this is the little loophole that will keep him out. Being a lawyer, I'd think you'd enjoy a little loophole like that.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 29, 2009 -> 09:58 PM) I guess we just have a fundamental difference in how the HOF should be administered. I think that players should be judged based purely on how they played the game, that everything outside of the game is completely irrelevant. That if you are going to bar players who cheat during a game, that the penalty has to be consistent and fair. That it can not be arbitrary, that the rules must be in place so that they can be followed, so that the consequences are known. I dont think Ive ever disagreed that Bonds cheated, I just think that he belongs in the HOF regardless. That if Bonds is kept out, the HOF begins to become a joke. You will have the all time home run leader and the all time hits leader both not in the Hall of Fame. At least in the case of Rose he was permanently banned from Baseball, Bonds could return tomorrow as a coach or player if he was hired. Bonds and Rose should start their own Hall of Fame and just put people in strictly on the merits of their playing career. Let the rest of the world deal with gossip, and let them (Bonds and Rose) judge you by how you played. We will never know who else took steroids and will go to the hall that we just didnt catch, so why make it a charade? Is Clemens in the HOF? Ptatc, In my opinion you have not broken the law until you are convicted. The Federal Govt will never bring a case against Barry Bonds for illegally using substances, so I will consider him innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law. Sweet! As long as I murder someone and don't get caught, I didn't break the law.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 29, 2009 -> 09:26 PM) http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_...21----000-.html Key part: "WHICH HE DOES NOT BELIEVE TO BE TRUE" So as long as Bonds believed it to be true, he has to be not guilty of perjury. So if I really thought that crack was aspirin, it is not perjury when I say "I thought it was aspirin" even if every other person in the world would have known the difference. The only person that matters is Bonds. How do you prove what Bonds knew or didnt know? Unless you can bring in a witness to testify that Bonds knew, the case is dead in the water. Ptatc, What law do you believe Bonds broke? And do you think that all players who break the law should be prevented from being HOF? (DUI, fake id, marijuana included) He took illegal steroids. And before you say, "you can't prove that he took them willfully," it doesn't matter in terms of the HOF. The HOF doesn't have to prove he meant to do it, they just know he did use illegal steroids. That can be grounds for keeping him out.