Kyyle23

QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 20, 2013 -> 08:18 AM) What about Jim Thome? What about him? Thome hit homeruns and struck out. He averaged 140 strikeouts a season for the Sox,

QUOTE (southsideirish71 @ Nov 20, 2013 -> 07:23 AM) Well just picked up an Xbox One on Amazon this morning I should have it on Friday by 8pm. I love tracker websites. Same thing worked for me during the xbox 360 launch. I can't read this, Olivia is touching her boobs I'm distracted I have the same problem when Brian posts

QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 10:45 PM) Well, we were also discussing strikeouts, and if you compare Ozzie's time to Robin's so far, we have far more strikeouts per season then we used to with Ozzie ball. Even then, the strikeout difference is 200, and that is attributed to one player, Adam Dunn(189). Not the myth that is Ozzie Ball. Ozzie Ball was a really good pitching staff, not an offensive Philosophy/system

QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 10:28 PM) Well, compared to other Ozzie years, no. http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CH...8-batting.shtml http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CH...6-batting.shtml It was the 5th most home runs in the LEAGUE. And you just disproved your own Ozzie ball theory. Ozzie had teams that could hit it out of the park, period. Just because he gave away outs sometimes doesn't mean his teams didn't have power

QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:57 PM) Not in 05 Really? http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CH...ml?mobile=false 200 isn't a lot?

QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:38 PM) Have we forgotten the ways of Ozzie Ball? Ozzie ball contained a lot of home runs

wite, did you really do that in J4Ls dream? i dont even know you, Blake Blakeman

QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 04:01 PM) What if the d-back for Carolina doesn't make a clean catch and the ball pops up right into the vicinity of Kuechly and Gronk. My favorite part of it all was Ryan Mallet coming to Brady's aid out of nowhere to help him argue that call. That and audibly hearing Brady yell, "that is f***ing bulls***!" Off topic but Mallet's going to be a stud. Like his fire too. All i am going to say is that if Cutler was the one walking off the field berating the officials like that, there would be a national outrage.

QUOTE (Brian @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 03:10 PM) How do you not like Sam Rockwell? He's great in everything. +1 I want a sequel to Galaxy Quest just to see him reprise that character

Anyone watch "Almost Human"? Worth catching?

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 12:52 PM) <!--quoteo(post=2892379:date=Nov 19, 2013 -> 12:45 PM:name=KyYlE23)-->QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 12:45 PM) <!--quotec-->This will be my christmas present to me http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/19/sup...3d-world-review Looks surprisingly like this. Revolutionary! /stevehaterpostonanythingkyylepostsaboutnintendo Im sure you will enjoy it on an emulator in 3 years

This will be my christmas present to me http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/19/sup...3d-world-review

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Nov 18, 2013 -> 09:55 PM) Uh oh Steph Curry just got broken. What happened to him?

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 10:28 AM) Welp...Pats got me 3 points, I needed 4 (going up against the guy with the Bengals defense). I was 2nd in points on the week, he was 1st and beat me by less then 1 point. I am now 5-6 with 100 more points then anyone else in my league. There is nothing more annoying than being the guy that every team has their highest scoring game against

Cano to the Mets would be sooooo Mets-like. And Cano would probably spend the next 9 out of 10 years on the DL

QUOTE (scs787 @ Nov 18, 2013 -> 10:26 PM) Did you have babies though? I've read a "stat" that 80% of the time there is babies involved. If you trap the female the babies will die and stink up the house. There wasnt babies, so you should look and keep them with the mom. Any way you do it, it is probably a death sentence for the babies. Moving them to the woods right when winter starts isnt gonna be good for them, and a exterminator will euthanize them

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 10:00 AM) He has kind of a cool last name. I wish that was my last name. change your name. for coolness sake

This is what happens when a man named Clete Blakeman referees games.

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:52 AM) I have no earthly idea where he gets the 18 seconds. Can someone explain to me? He had 3 timeouts and like 50 - 60 seconds left and 1st and goal. In what world would there be 18 seconds left? I'd think you'd have like 30-40 seconds left. Come on Jason, this is so 24 hours ago. We are arguing Gronk now

QUOTE (Jake @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:41 AM) I actually don't think Kuechly did much to move Gronk, who definitely didn't have a chance to adjust. His hand placement is pretty incriminating, though. I do think that this "controversy" is at least 50% "it's the Patriots!" related Maybe nationally/ESPN. But I dont think many on this board care about the Patriots enough to be outraged. I think we are arguing because it was a s***ty call and s***ty explanation. if it was the Bears against (insert team), it certainly would have been less of a story on ESPN

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:31 AM) Sure, if you ignore the defender 2-3 yards in front of him in the path of the ball. Again, you are dismissing Gronks ability to stay on the play. Kuechly pushed him off of it. I think Gronk has demonstrated the ability to make ridiculous plays If the INT is dropped, I bet that PI/interference call is upheld

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:28 AM) That initial contact happens on every single play in the NFL these days. I agree that a second or two before the ball is intercepted the guy is interfering with him, but to call that catchable you have to completely ignore the other defender who gets in between Gronk and the ball. Gronks head is turned to the ball, he absolutely could have come back to the ball and made a play if Kuechly isnt grabbing him

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:22 AM) But he didn't run a curl. He ran to the back of the endzone. And the ball was caught almost at the same time that he was interfered with. The only hope Gronk has of catching that ball is a deflection. But that didn't happen, the dude caught the ball. Wrong. He was being held before he entered the endzone

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:12 AM) That's defensive holding and not pass interference. I dont care what it was, the flag shouldnt have been picked up. The officials shouldnt be estimating if the ball could have been caught in that situation because it was irrelevant.

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 19, 2013 -> 09:09 AM) With the spirit of the rule in mind, why should the officials have bailed out Brady and the Patriots for an awful throw? This isn't a ball that lands 5 yards short and is arguably catchable, it was intercepted 7-8 yards in front of the receiver. He had no hope of catching that ball. I disagree that he had no hope of catching it. It was short for sure, but if Gronk runs a curl in front of Kuechly, he would have been standing right where it was intercepted. Plus, Kuechly was face guarding AND grabbing him before Gronk even entered the endzone, before the ball was thrown.