southsider2k5

Don't do this.

Most of Soxtalk honestly.

Ah, so we are back to not wanting open-mindedness, just bald name calling and wanting to hear your opinion parroted back at you. Glad to see your rant was entire self-serving and not self-reflective.

Even more than his "defense" is that his baseball IQ seems to be non-existent. He's just a baseball dumb player. I also feel like LF is a better position for guys like that too. If he is going to hang on, he has got to figure a position to stick on, and with the Sox current make up, it almost certainly isn't going to be 2B, and he doesn't look to hit enough to DH.

Yes, as you repeatedly reply to my posts, and throw up your passive aggressive emojis on my posts, you aren't worried about me at all. Your actions speak a whole different story. You want a "new beginning" for real? Look at your post right here. Everything is dredging up the past. Drop the stalking routine and actually talk baseball instead of all of the past times someone dared to disagree with you. You remember your speech yesterday on "openmindedness" right. Does that only apply to everyone else? Take your own advice, quit acting like a kicked puppy and let things get better. No need to keep playing the victim card. Move on. For real this time.

My answer would be that you want to make the most of the talent you have in front of you. The Sox have a ton of IF's and not many OFs. If someone can be made to play a passable LF, do it.

For all of the urge to play position players out of position we have had historically, I don't get why we haven't looked at trying to get Lenyn into somewhere like LF. The bat would play out there, and it isn't like he would be replacing a defensive whiz or a bat first LF anyway.

Bringing this back to full circle, I will note a few things here. -Judging by the fact that the White Sox were willing to trade for fringe of the 40 man roster guys from other teams instead of putting their own internal guys on the 40, I think that tells us a lot about what they ACTUALLY think of some of these guys, despite what gets published about them. -There is nothing wrong with looking to benefit from other teams roster crunches, and looking to marginally improve the roster, especially in areas of known weakness, such as the OF. -FInd someone who loves you like Chris Getz loves a fallen top prospect. -I have no problem with trading a guy like Gomez who is older and struggling to make it, but I am not as big of a fan of trading our younger guys like Ronny Hernandez. Those are the kinds of guys we should be hoarding like a Boomer with bicentennial quarters. -It's probably the PTSD talking, but after reading up about Murphy and how lucky his 2025 was, he is probably our next Wilson. I get we need a LOT of innings filled next year, and they all can't be internal, but hopefully he proves me wrong. I don't mind getting a guy like that in a roster dump for roster dump deal though. Maybe Pitching Coach to be Named Later is really as good as they say he is and can fix him.

Considering you have been cyberstalking me for years now, who knows. One day hopefully you will get over it and move... but I doubt it. Seems to be every Soxtalk interaction you make these days. Pity party indeed.

Os fans are about at the point in the timeline where Jerry forced TLR back into the dugout. They have to be losing their minds.

A highlight reel of our broadcast from my HS Regional Championship game from Friday night was featured on the Indiana Athletic Association's main page. I didn't expect that.

Wow they were even a couple of roster spots lighter than I thought, and I was on the far end of the low protection scale here.

If Tampa can't do it...

Quality rosterbating

Are we at the deadline? Is this it?

Sounds like BOS wants to free up 40 man space, which means not Lee, Teel, or Quero.

https://x.com/Britt_Ghiroli/status/1990911331038384543

Be interested to learn more about him. Looks like he missed 2024, and came back WAY better than he had been in the past. Dude struggled in his previous years at AAA, and then came back stronger, and was better in MLB than he ever was in AAA. Weird.

I think there is a difference between maybe a starter, and an established starter, and that's why he doesn't get moved. That's where the "selling low" idea comes in. It is shorthand for the difference.

I think "low" is accurate as guys who are still unproven and closer to the "prospect" bucket are valued lower than guys who are "proven" at the major league level. It's why a deal like the deal that brought Teel to the White Sox happen. Even though potential is high, it isn't realized yet, so those guys are valued at a fraction of what they would be if they were major league proven. If you sell him and he turns into a full time starter, you almost certainly sold "low" with how he would be valued as of today.

That's just depressing.

Looking at this from an acquiring team standpoint, are you willing to pay a starting catcher price for a guy who has his level of experience and success? If teams are not, I am not sure why Getz would be willing to deal him at a price of a part timer, or unproven player.

You also have to get someone to offer you a full time starter for him. I am guessing that is what they are waiting for.

No it is much better to give us this with every post.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6816195/2025/11/18/seattle-mariners-jorge-polanco-market-mlb-notes/?source=dailyemail&campaign=601983&userId=6062851&source=dailyemail