Dick Allen

QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 03:03 PM) Wasn't that Jermaine Dye's wrap before we struck big on him? We are going to need to take a shot at something. I agree they have to take chances, but when GarGo plays 115 games and puts up a .715 OPS, you probably regret ignoring the flashing red lights you see as you are about to complete the trade.

The Rockies aren't going to give him away. That is pretty apparent. So it will take something more than halfway decent to get him.

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 02:43 PM) Ah yes, I forgot the common player that never needs to be spelled and we only carry 3 outfielders. When you are starting Jordan Danks for a month or a month and a half, trading actual good prospects for GarGo makes even less sense. I'd rather they get someone they could actually count on to play 150-155 or more games. Not someone you hope at this stage defies what his history has shown.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 02:19 PM) Yep. Seems these outs also seem to work for the team if they can walk away. It worked like a charm for JR with Albert Belle. And I'm sure the Yankees regret not walking away from ARod or CC when the time came. Sign these guys and give them an out in 2 or 3 seasons. It keeps them motivated for more cash. Then let them walk away.

Didn't CC have an out, and actually is on his second Yankee contract?

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 01:32 PM) Absolutely. AJP is a great example. Not including his release from Boston, the last 3 teams AJP left, the Giants, White Sox, and Rangers averaged 21 less wins the season after his departure. The Twins improved 2 games.

Even if you want to ignore his splits, and IMO, a split with that big of a discrepancy should not be ignored, the only time GarGo played more than 135 games was in 2010. Who are you going to put out in LF the 30 games or more he misses?

QUOTE (chw42 @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 12:41 PM) Both teams have 5 guys they can start. But not having Shields for game 4 could hurt the Royals more than the O's. I like that a lot better than what it was a few years ago, where if you had 2 or 3 great starters, that was really all you needed in the playoffs. With all the off days they used to have in the playoffs, it was a different game than the regular season. That seems dumb to me.

LA with a new stadium is a no brainer for at least one team, and probably 2. They will generate some serious revenue.

The Royals led baseball is stolen bases. The other 3 teams standing were the bottom 3 in that department.

I saw there is a report that there may be 2 teams in LA next year. Raiders, Rams, and Chargers are the candidates. The plan is to play in Dodgers Stadium until a new stadium is built.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 8, 2014 -> 04:07 PM) Really, wait a second, didn't someone post in the NLDS thread that Mattingly was fired? D'Oh. And anyway, no 2014 is not the season Robin Ventura deserved to be fired for, 2013 was. Since that didn't happen when it should have, the next time he deserves to be fired is when the Sox spend money and the team fails. If they spend a boatload of money this offseason and they aren't a playoff team, then there better be a darn good excuse for why, because that would mean something went very wrong. So it was Robin's fault Paulie and Dunn made a combined $27.5 million in 2013 and sucked,Thanks for the knowledge.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 8, 2014 -> 01:08 PM) So in your world, it's totally impossible for a manager to ever make a serious difference in how a roster performs and managers should just have their positions until they want to retire. Right? After all, what serious standard are you willing to use to evaluate a manager? If the guy isn't drunk off his ass the whole day, it's the players who perform or don't perform, and that standard applies whether they blow up in the postseason or on day 1 of the season. You made the remark that he needs to be held accountable depending on money spent, not me. Simply judging a manager by how the wins correlate with the payroll is ridiculous. I don't agree with everything Robin does, but unlike some, I do realize this isn't a 130 win team with a guy from a message board managing it. Baseball isn't like poker. You can't bluff your way to many wins with a bad hand, and the hand is the responsibility of someone else. If the White Sox spend money on bad players, that is on the GM. If the White Sox have good players and can't win, then by all means blame the manager. There have been so many moves made this postseason where if Robin made them, they would be considered fireable offenses here.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 8, 2014 -> 12:19 PM) Depends on how much they spend this offseason. They go out and spend $40 million+ on free agents, which they could do, and miss the playoffs next year, that manager's job better darn well be on the line. You always post like any money spent on players is coming from your bank account. Why wouldn't spending a ton of money on players who can't play be on the guy actually signing them? Is it Robin's fault Keppinger sucked? Paulino? Downs? Belisario? Then it must be Robin's pure genius that made Abreu a star.

There is zero reason why Illinois can't be like Wisconsin or Iowa or Minnesota or Michigan State. The tier below Michigan and Ohio State in the Big 10, where bowl games are expected and really nice runs and a Big Ten title can happen if everything breaks correctly. All of those programs had 20 year or more stretches that were far worse than any Illinois has had. They just need to hire the right guy. Wisconsin hired Alvarez. Iowa, Fry. Beckman was in over his head since day one and it was pretty obvious. Giving him the 3 year courtesy did nothing but make the wait longer for them to be a good team again. Players he has been recruiting know there is zero chance he will be there in a couple of years. That said, they have to make sure they don't hire a guy who thinks its a stepping stone job. That's why I would look for a guy a little older, maybe pushing 50 or even a little older than that, who can recruit and can bring in a coaching staff where his possible replacement is already there. Even if the assitant leaves in a few seasons for a head coaching job, he will have established a relationshiip. Good coaches almost always have pretty impressive coaching trees.

QUOTE (oldsox @ Oct 8, 2014 -> 08:45 AM) I had forgotten about some of the Bevington era flaws. That would be an interesting thread all by itself. Yes. The signaling to the bullpen with no one warming up was a classic that has never been forgotten, but I can't believe I forgot about his arguing a call that actually went the White Sox way.

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 8, 2014 -> 08:33 AM) Damn that's a depressing read. Say what you will about Kenny, but if the GM version of him had been around in the 1990s, he would have pulled out all stops. Schueler was pretty good for a while. Lamont getting fired was unfair. Bevington, there really isn't an excuse, but he was signing the correct guys and until he traded McDowell, he was making really good moves. After the strike, he got ultra conservative. Signing Clemens would have helped, but would really be tainted. The White Flag trade eventually helped the team. I know JR felt the 2000 division crown was vindication.

I would much rather have Viciedo than Hart.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 3, 2014 -> 10:20 PM) Is anyone in danger... well besides Joe maybe getting a management job? I would think Daryl Boston, since he is the baserunning and OF guy, might have some heat on him. Also, coaching 1B, there are things you tell the baserunner, just in case he forgets...check the OFs, maybe something about a pick off move, how many outs there are, don't get tagged out....not to blame Boston, since guys making millions to play the game should know, but it is apparent they need to be reminded. Maybe he is and they still can't figure it out. But I think if anyone is getting demoted or fired, he would be the prime candidate.

Is Williams an idiot or did he do what he should have done yanking Zimmerman after the walk and 100 pitches?

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 2, 2014 -> 09:28 PM) "Making things up" = "4 separate links including one to the source you say you're citing establishing that over the exact time period you asked for". You are truly at a new low. I'm out. This is just sad. Look at page 73 in the 2014 BP then pop off. A low is accusing someone of lying without even checking.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 2, 2014 -> 09:22 PM) Well, that's 4 linked websites all of which say the same thing, a slightly above average hitters park that sometimes plays extremely above average, versus your word. Everyone else can take their pick about what to believe. Hell, even if you posted the document I'm going to go with what every other place, including BP, says. My word is solid. Anyone with a 2014 BP can verify my post. The only one making things up is you saying they would be 5th if they played at Comerica Park.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 2, 2014 -> 09:11 PM) 2012: well above average for both righties and lefties, 12 more runs than average ballpark. 2013: above average for righties (105), slightly below average for lefties (97), translating to an above average hitters ballpark. 2014: 104 for righties, 98 for lefties, same story, comes out to an above average hitters ballpark overall (and wondering if Chris Sale isn't impacting the lefties). Did you seriously think that because you posted twice without including a link that I couldn't check? (2011, similar story, 107 for righties, 99 for lefties, above average hitters park each of the last 4 years). I get the BP book every year 100 avg. 3 year avg Runs 99 HR rh91 HR lh102 Runs lh105 Runs rh 99 Go look at the book. And I will accept your apology.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 2, 2014 -> 09:00 PM) 2010: 4th best hitters park 2011: 14th 2012: 2nd best 2013: 14th 2014: 7th Always above average, overall not Coors but one of the better hitters parks in the league. someone else's version just for good measure: Fangraphs has us as an above average hitters park corrected downwards for WAR in 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010. Had enough or going to make something up again? Not making anything up. BP has it at 100 the last 3 years. Exactly average.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 2, 2014 -> 08:32 PM) But that's happening in a hitters ballpark. An "Average" White Sox pitching staff throwing in this ballpark would be 8th/10th in ERA in the AL. Put the same pitching staff in Comerica and they're 5th in ERA. It has played as a neutral park the past 3 or 4 years yet no top half of the AL finishes. Next excuse. Also check their splits. Many pitch much better at home.