T R U

QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 11:55 AM) That's debatable... haha no its only how you know me from a message board.. you dont hang out with me or know me personally so its a totally different situation

QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 11:46 AM) A thirteen year old can not fully appriciate the effect of what he's doing. That goes for having sex or going to the movies. Secondly I would say those kids would be "f***ed" up for life but thats just me. I had sex when I was 13, im fine

QUOTE(SoxFan562004 @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 10:19 AM) they help recovery time, so a pitcher could use them in the off-season to increase the intensity of their workouts, then cycle off and maintain some of the mass. Also, there's different types of steriods... Winstrall will help cut your look up, but also increase recovery time, which is what a relief pitcher may want A Pitcher taking steroids is quiter possibly the worst idea they could think of.. Yeah, it will help you get more muscle mass and recover quicker, but it doesnt do JACK s*** for your tendons and ligaments.. which would easily lead to a bum shoulder or elbow simply from the fact you were taking steroids.. Your muscles would develope, but tendons and ligaments would not, causing greater stress on them.. not too smart.. Winstrol would be a better option, like you said it will help you get cut, and its not going to make you some hulking mass of insanity..

QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 11:34 AM) No it's not "fine." But there is a much greater chance that the two thirteen year olds would be more on the same level emotionally and it's doubtful one thirteen year old would have that much authority over the other one. Again point me to where it said that the kid was FORCED to do anything or was against his own will in this, I dont recall seeing that anywhere.. And it is fine because when you hear about younger kids having sex you dont say "Well those kids are f***ed"

QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 11:35 AM) Maybe in your world. Both are wrong in mine. your right.. cept it would be in my TIME, not world

QUOTE(qwerty @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 04:55 PM) I would like to upgrade our lead-off hitter. I agree with Qwerty

QUOTE(Controlled Chaos @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 11:28 AM) When I was in high school we used to open all the windows and freeze, but act like we were hot, just so the french teachers nipples would get hard. I didn't even take french...but I ended up in her classroom on more than one occasion. not so relevant to the topic...but wanted to share Oh I miss high school... bah hahahaha... thats awesome

whenever I get home from school or get to a computer this is the order of the websites I visit, the routine doesnt change.. 1. Finheaven.com(Message Board) 2. Soxtalk.com(Message Board) 3. ESPN.com 4. CBSSportline.com 5. XNetwrestling.com(E Fed/Message Board) 6. SouthSiders(Message Board) 7. Check sim league 8. Check sim league board(Message Board)

so let me get this straight.. if a 13 year old has sex with a 13 year old... its fine BUT if a 13 year old has sex with a 27 year old, the kid is f***ed for life?? HMM..

QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Feb 10, 2005 -> 12:21 AM) Well, back when I was in 8th grade, banging the attractive 27 year old female would have only turned you into a legend, and not a basketcase in need of a psychiatrist. Is it absolutely pathetic that a 27 year old woman would participate in sexual intercourse with an 8th grader? You're damn right. Is the kid gonna need a psychiatrist? Hahahahahaaa!!!! I don't think so. my thoughts exactly

QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 10:36 PM) He was raped, whether she used force or not. This woman was placed in a position of trust and power over this boy and she abused both of those. Imagine if your first relationship (sexual or whatever) was based on such a mismatched power dynamic. The reason that this kind of things are illegal is because it takes sex out of the realm of intimacy and makes it about power and control. I don't know how anyone can just walk away from that. Child sexual abuse is child sexual abuse--regardless of how the victim responds to the abuse. Using that logic, if a kid who is molested by his priest but doesn't say no, or doesn't run away does that mean he won't have problems later? No. First of all, no woman will ever have power over me and second, your still getting off from what I was trying to ask Jeckle.. Yes I understand that it was "Rape" either way.. but if the boy WANTED to do it, and wasnt forced into doing it I dont see why he would have problems later on in life.. I understand what your saying though, its just not exactly what Im trying to get at here.. and uhh.. i dont know what boy WOULDNT say no to having some old guy touching his goodies

Man did you guys see the Duke/UNC game that s*** was CRAZEEEEEEE

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 11:41 PM) All this man love is making me uncomfortable. Do you need a hug??

QUOTE(Goldmember @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 11:02 PM) obviously not if your fav chick is paris... First of all, you shut your ass up.. dont diss Paris and second, I only have one thing to say about Dee... Dee Brown is a mother f***ing badass and I love him, I dont care if you think thats gay, he is a f***ing BADASS!!!! that is all EDIT: I also forgot to mention that Flipped Out Punk is also one of my loves

I just hope Digger will stop riding UNC's nuts now and just admit Illinois is the best team in the Nation

QUOTE(ChiSoxyGirl @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 10:03 PM) 13 year olds cannot legally give consent. So, the article didn't have to say it. The law does. that has nothing to do with what I said if the kid was like saying no and was forced to do it, then yeah he might have problems if he WASNT then I cant agree with what Jeckle is saying

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 08:36 PM) And Vida's hot right? bah hahaha Vida is so ugly.. all she has is an ass, and thats not what im lookin for

QUOTE(WilliamTell @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 08:44 PM) wow that title really made my heart jump. Same here, my heart dropped

QUOTE(Jeckle2000 @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 09:32 PM) Glad i'm not the only one who thinks this is just as serious as if a Man did it. Mark my words this kid is going to need Therapy and at the very least he's going to have screwed up relationships with women. Why do you say that, hes 13 He can think and make decisions, did the article say he was raped?

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 04:32 PM) I'd give them next years 1st and 4th along with this years 3rd. but why?? of course it would be nice to have both.. Bears dont even have a 3rd this year.. so that wouldnt work 3 picks for a rookie is steep, especially one thats an OLB and not a HUGE impact player like a QB or LT also, I doubt a top 15 team is gonna move their first.. they are picking that high for a reason and will need that top pick wishful thinking, but I think the Bears will be happy with the WR they take

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 08:48 AM) Anyone see Paris on SNL this past weekend? Talk about a total 'poser'. She acts like every time she's in front of a camera that it's actually a shoot for like Penthouse. Nothing is ever just a normal expression or movement with her. Her eys, her voice, her body, her walk, it's always SOOOOOO oversexed. Who buys into that crap?

wow... what a slap in the face

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 03:23 PM) I'd trade next seasons 1st round pick for Derrick Johnson. If that's all it would take, which i highly doubt. exactly... the point is what team is gonna say "Here, have our top 10 1st round pick this year and well take yours next year not gonna happen... a 2nd this year is worth a 1st next year... so it would be have to be a 1st PLUS and I doubt they would do that

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Feb 9, 2005 -> 03:11 PM) I meant it's weird in the sence that a team would use the franchise tag on a kicker but in the Patriots current situation franchising Vinatieri makes a lot of sense. yeah I know what you mean.. but he is worth the cost

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Feb 8, 2005 -> 03:26 PM) Well they could...anything can happen. But they'd have to give up an insane package to get another top 10 pick(possibly another top 5 pick, because I have seen comparisons of Johnson to Ray Lewis, only at OLB, noting that he is that good), and that would be stupid as hell. Scott Wright has Johnson going at 16, and I don't think there is a chance of that happening...not even close, nor do I think he is going to be the second OLB taken(though Merriman is listed as an OLB/DE). Basically, I view both Williams and Johnson as top 10 picks, to whoever. The Bears might get one, but not a chance(if they are smart) at both. For the Bears to have any chance at getting BOTH those players it would take their 1st Round Pick NEXT draft and maybe more So pretty much theres no chance in hell it can happen