Heads22

Rangercal got it. With this. QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 04:42 PM) It would be so nice if the NFL turned its back on this kid and he actually had to work for a living with that degree he got... Oops. I know I would not want that pos on the bears

Do it and you'll get f***ed up.

Can't say I disagree with that.

I thought Saban deserved a sniff.

Wow. You know that we all send our thoughts out to you. Take care, Steff.

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 03:38 PM) I hate Chris Simms. Long live Major Applewhite. Indeed.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 03:29 PM) Sounds like an excuse and an unwarranted one. Sounds like the Hawkeyes' excuse after the Outback Bowl.

QUOTE(RME JICO @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 02:34 PM) Yeah but you compared him to Timo not Pods. If he did make the roster I could see him giving Pods or Anderson a break, he could bat leadoff and could pinch run. He would be more valuable on the bench than Timo was. LOL....just file me with the others in the "Give Owens some AAA time" bunch.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 11:46 AM) What the hell are you talking about. Heath = pitcher I know. It was a joke.

Colts 14, Bears 11

QUOTE(RME JICO @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 01:06 PM) He is on the 40 man roster for a reason - to compete. Otherwise why bring him to ST? LOL....I just don't think we need another speedy lefty who can't hit for power and has a noodley arm. We've already got the all-star version.

Oooo-ggg-lay.

QUOTE(RME JICO @ Jan 7, 2006 -> 12:35 PM) If Owens has a great ST, he might slip into the opening day roster. It is definitely a possibility. We had a backup leftfielder in Timo last year.....we don't need Owens in the same role.

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 10:48 PM) Heath actaully PM'ed me and thanked me for picking him as his AOP. Very cool. If he'd get on base as much as Mr. Ricks, I would've picked him too.

Do you moonlight as an RSS reader?

Oh s***, I forgot when I get back to Ames I've got one thing lined up that'd be right up my alley.

What percentage could actually afford to move or get that insurance?

There, you can rest easy tonight knowing Raul has a home.

QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 08:03 PM) It dont make no sense to none of us! Probably just Fox blowing his stats up on TV, but to give him an extra 45 tackles is just ridiculous And Briggs an extra 67....

QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 07:59 PM) maybe its solo + assisted tackles? Fox Sports gives Urlacher 98 solo and 24 assisted.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 07:57 PM) I have been wondering that myself. I am pretty sure NFL team coach staffs count tackles significantly different than places like NFL.com and ESPN.com I mean, that's a large disparity between those two guys and their numbers....like 116 tackles....like 8 a game or so.

170 and 169 vs 122 and 102 Where exactly does the disparity come from?

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 07:42 PM) 170 was blasted all over Fox the last game of the season. Tackle stats are far from official, teams count them much differently than websites. Where does he rank compared to everyone else, then?

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 07:27 PM) Heads, you always put a positive spin on anythin regardin the Bears dontcha. 170 seemed too damn high.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ Jan 6, 2006 -> 07:26 PM) Tackle stats are different everywhere you look I went with the article on top of the page and doublechecked on NFL.com. I would expect that'd be good enough.