hi8is

QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 08:27 AM) WE ARE GETTING MONEY IN THE DEAL!!! YAY!!! http://www.nynewsday.com/sports/baseball/m...ports-headlines what yah dont know how to read boy?!

QUOTE(fathom @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 08:23 AM) Flash....I don't think that Arizona is going to pay any of Vazquez's deal. KW is really, really overpaying here. hey buddy.... then you have no reason to believe that vizciano is a part of the deal because the same source that is reporting him being the other pitcher is also saying that we are getting CASH in return as well.. hush now little baby, dont be afraid, mommas gonna buy you a mocking bird.

oh boy, time for more pictures?!? YEEHHHH HAAAWWWW

i think vizciano had an era last year PRE-ALLSTAR break of something like 5.65.... that was inflated by a bad preformance in one game (3rd game of the year vs cleveland) but i mean.... the guy wasnt a IRREPLACEABLE guy out of the BP

stop raping my mind. also from the news day article: "In return for Vazquez and money" so we get cash supposedly

the title of the article is also : "Mets lose Vazquez to White Sox" who knows how accurate they really are =P oh, i get it.... news day is a NY site and they are pissed we traded for vazquez and not us.

Vizcaino hummmmmmmmmm hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm hopefully their wrong if not a couple of FA arms are coming to our BP

oh while we're dreaming... how about garland for manny rameriz HAHA never happening but... move pods to center.... 1. Pods 2. Uribe 3. Thome 4. Rameriz 5. Konerko 6. Dye 7. AJ 8. Crede 9. Anderson that line up is just plain stupid sick hah to bad mannys a nutcase

QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 07:05 AM) Well because with the right pitching coach(Coop), Vazquez can be electric. Not just good, electric. He has as good of stuff as anyone else on the staff if not better when on. your preaching to the wrong person here brother =D

QUOTE(hitlesswonder @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 07:11 AM) So where do you think he will start? I'm thinking maybe Tampa Bay or Cincinnati. go away and come back when you know that 2 + 2 = 5

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 07:03 AM) Where on cbssportsline? Link it. he means duque and young for vazquez, thats all that is on cbs.sportsline.com

QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 06:58 AM) I still think Garland stays. Sox near deal for D-Backs' Vazquez i dont know whats gonna happen with garland..... that being said... KW also told us not to follow the news because after the marte trade we we're set RIIIIGHT!

15 people positve about vazquez and only 8 negitive against him so it looks like the general population here for the most part likes vazquez

how about abreu

QUOTE(Leonard Zelig @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 05:54 AM) Where did you read that? in my head?

QUOTE(Jordan4life_2005 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 05:52 AM) Can't be worse than how they bashed the Pods/Viz for C-Lee deal last year. on the same day too haha 12/13

just read its a done deal, i couldnt stop myself from getting up and running around the room with my TOOL blaring. we might miss young... thanks duque, contreras will be fine..... and vazquez, you'll love it here on the southside... your gonna be just fine big guy! but he's a fly ball pitcher and wont pitch well for us... and jeremy reed is going to be sooooooo good in CF for seattle, he will win rookie of the year....and garcia will suck, he is a fly ball picther!

let me put it this way.... when the contreras trade went down i was estatic.... why? because i believed that the talented coaching staff (KW, cooper, and ozzie) could help him achive sustained sucess.... that is what i believe, we began to see last year with contreras.... i believe if they can do it with contreras... they can do it with vazquez.... accaully, i think the transition period would be less then it was for contreras.... for contreras it took 1/2 of 2004 and all of spring training to get going.... i think vazquez could be on the begining swing of a turn around right out of the spring training gates.... this is coming from someone who watched jose contreras give up 8 ER in 3 IP last year in spring training against the d-backs..... the next day, before the game i told contreras that he looked good the other day and he will be great this year.... that same day, i watched vazquez pitch against us.

QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 05:35 AM) A possible ace, well Chris Young is a possible superstar as well. yeah and i like the idea of a possible ace better then a possible superstar who has just had sucess up to the AA level. there are guys who hit .400 in AAA and then come up here and never really find it.... let me guess... you thought willie harris was gonna be the next willie mays.... because willie hit .400 in the minors. he coulda been a superstar... no way... trade willie mays for someone like barry zito? are you nuts, willie could be a star!!!

QUOTE(FGarcia34 @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 05:34 AM) Just what the Rock wanted, bravo KW if this is true. and ill stick my foot in my mouth and eat it because i thought there was no way in hell wed get vazquez without including one of the major horses

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Dec 14, 2005 -> 05:25 AM) So, we'd resist trading Garland, and instead have a 6 man rotation? And the absence of Chris Young? :headshake This would indicate either another trade is in the works for Garland, or McCarthy is destined for the bullpen. Trading Garland, regardless of his contract situation, should--at the least--bring back a quality reliever and prospect. HAH awsome get el duque off the books and outta the pen... give bmac more time to transition into the leauge.... have another possible ace in the rotation and one in the bullpen..... and no matter how big of a woody you all have for chris young... hes still a prospect... no prospect is a sure thing.... id have to say that a #1 rated CF prospect in AA isnt as important as a possible front line starter with major leauge sucess.... expecially when you are stacked from a minor leauge CF stand point.

i just love the diversity in all of our expressions and ideals....... it makes things like PTI possible. heh