I wasn't being serious. I was just throwing out names of ND quarterbacks.
If the team is going to tank though, then why not bring in Tebow? It will make losing more entertaining.
This is the fatal flaw with the NFL right now, and it's why it's much less fun for me to watch.
1) The game has evolved to where you need an elite QB, or at least a near-elite QB along with an elite defense, in order to win a championship
2) There is a large talent gap between the #1 and #32 QB in the NFL
The net result of those two facts is that about half the teams start each season with absolutely no chance to win the Super Bowl, and of those half, at most three will get the chance to draft a QB in the next draft that will get them out of that bottom half.
The Trent Dilfer 2000 Ravens don't compete in this era. The 2010 season showed that the Bears can win with Cutler IF everything else falls into place perfectly, but things aren't going to fall into place perfectly anytime before Jay's age gets to him. The Bears also picked a really bad season to be this bad because I don't see a franchise QB out there.
I haven't seen a truly dominant team yet. I think any of these teams could end up in the playoff:
Ohio St, Michigan St, Mississippi, Georgia, LSU, Alabama, Clemson, Utah, UCLA, USC, Baylor, Oklahoma, Notre Dame.
In 1988-89 my HS team was state runner-up, ND won the national championship, and the Bears reached the NFC championship game. I'm never going to have a better football year than that.
As an individual government employee, I am buying into one or more specific funds, each of which is invested differently. However you are in the fund jointly with all other government employees, and any dividends paid out are rolled into the price of the fund. You don't have to have your money in the fund for any specific period of time in order to share in those dividends.
EDIT: Here, maybe this: https://www.tsp.gov/investmentfunds/fundsov...sonMatrix.shtml will help you understand it better.
On any given day, I can move my money between any of the funds, with the exception that for any fund other than G, once I move money out of a fund, I can't put more back in until the first of the next month.
The offending party is the party that is willing to shut down the government over the status quo. In 2013, Obamacare was the established status quo. In 2015, PP funding is the status quo. Personally, I think PP is a soulless, morally bankrupt organization, but I'm not in favor of shutting down the entire government to defund it.
I originally thought it was the former, but everything I'm reading indicates that it's the latter. The extreme right wing no longer has any power over him and he can get a CR passed.
It sounds like he fell on his sword to protect the country from a shutdown.