Jump to content

SCCWS

Members
  • Posts

    3,735
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SCCWS

  1. QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 04:53 PM) Doesn't every team that wins require everything to go right? If things didn't go right they wouldn't win. No they need "enough" things to go right not "all". Boston this season lost their No 1 and No 2 closers but their No 3 worked out. They signed Dempster as their 5th starter but he struggled so they acquired Peavy who got them through September. Middlebrooks struggled and got sent to the minors. They called up Bogarts a shortstop to play 3rd and he produced.
  2. QUOTE (Marty34 @ Dec 18, 2013 -> 10:38 AM) If his workout is impressive enough to sign him, use the closer role as incentive for Ryan Madson. I don't agree with several people who said "who cares who closes, next year is a lost year" I don't think the White Sox will contend next year but I think it is important to have a closer who is somewhat effective. Hopefully next year the Sox will put 4 or 5 young players on the field who represent our future. We appear to have pretty good young starting pitching. We need to create a winning atmosphere both for the young players as well as the fans. If we end up constantly blowing games in the late innings it could affect the clubhouse and fan interest. Reed was a pretty good closer in that he had 40 saves to 8 BLSV. I don't expect them to find another 40 game save guy next year but we also don't want them to throw out a 20/8 guy either.
  3. QUOTE (ptatc @ Dec 7, 2013 -> 03:10 PM) Shouldn't Sale be in the pen then? He threw harder out of the pen, most pitcher do when they don't need to worry about 5-7 innings of work. Matt Thornton is available and he would probably come cheap.
  4. Heard on WEEI in Boston that Peter Gammons said the Fister and Fielder moves may enable the Tigers to sign Choo or Ellsbury. Gammons also thinks salty to Marlins as others have speculated. I am not sure if Gammons is as reliable w rumors as he used to be.
  5. QUOTE (staxx @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 02:35 PM) I'd say so. I would be comfortable with it I would not be comfortable. Salty is one of the worse catchers defensively in baseball. His throws on attempted steals go everywhere but to the guy covering. He is supposedly good at working with pitchers. Lets not forget he lost his starting position in the playoffs to a .225 hitter in Ross.
  6. QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 2, 2013 -> 01:32 PM) That should not be a veteran catcher's job, that should be a coach's job. I'd rather go with 2 young catchers who can feed into each other while having a guy who has played catcher in the majors bring them along. You totally underestimate the role of a catcher. Almost every year in the World series a rookie plays for one of the teams. This year Boston had a rookie 3b/SS play a pivotable role. But in history, there has only been 5 rookie catchers start in a World Series. Even more amazing, only 1 rookie catcher in history has played for the winning World Series team-----Buster Posey. Pitching coaches work with the pitchers all the time but the catcher is very important during the actual game. The old adage of having strength up the middle starts at catcher. Now maybe Flowers or Phegley are really good working with pitchers. But usually young catchers struggling offensively are not because they are working on their own problems.
  7. QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 2, 2013 -> 10:53 AM) I disagree with this mentality. You are going to have to give up something of value - it might be small or have little value, like a AAA reliever or a fallen prospect, but it's still value for a rebuilding franchise. Hanigan is 33 and turns 34 in August. The most you can ultimately expect him to be productive for is 2 years. If he's non-tendered, sure, I don't care, bring him in. Then it just costs money. Right now, you are looking at giving up players, which is something the Sox are not in a position to do for a guy who is quite a ways on the wrong side of 30. Agree but don't forget we have a young starting pitching staff w 2 basically inexperienced catchers. A veteran catcher even if he is a back-up can help w the development of the pitchers.
  8. Maybe another name to thorw in the mix. According to Providence Journal Red Sox are looking at Ryan Hanigan of Cincinnati as a stop gap for a year or two. was injured last year but has a strong arm and good OBP.
  9. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 17, 2013 -> 02:50 PM) With Abreu in the fold, they can put a roster out there where they can legitimately say "if everything goes right this roster can compete". If they sign Paul Konerko, and especially if they dump Dunn to clear a spot for him, that's a move saying they aren't even going to try to field a competitive roster. Does "if everything goes right" mean Beckham leads the league in batting. Flowers and Viciedo each hit 50 homers, DeAza steals 60 bases and Sale wins 20 games and doubles as the closer. Lets realistically hope that they go from 99 to 80 losses next year. That may reguire a lot of things to go right.
  10. QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Nov 16, 2013 -> 05:42 PM) Bill Toasted Almon FYI---- Bill Almon is now the marketing Manager at his father's company Claflin Company in RI
  11. QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 13, 2013 -> 01:53 PM) I was the one who brought up Weiters for the sake of argument because we need a catcher. But I agree with this because Weiters has declined the past 2 seasons and getting Salty at 4/40 is a nice piece for what Hahn is trying to build. Then trade Santiago + to get your franchise third baseman. If Salty is already one of the worst catchers in baseball throwing base-stealers out, what will he be by Year 3
  12. Castro has had knee issues on and off for for 3 seasons. He had another surgery in September after going on DL late in year. Maybe why he is available.
  13. QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 10, 2013 -> 07:51 PM) Again, why are we trading Dunn? There is nobody in the system to take his place in 2014. If by the small chance you compete in 2014, his home runs will be a reason why. Keep him. Maybe an AL team gets desperate at the deadline. Well there may be. If Paulie comes back ( hope not) he may be reduced to a DH. Abreu is going to play 1B but we are not sure how well. When the Red Sox were looking at him, they projected him as a DH when Ortiz retired.
  14. QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 9, 2013 -> 01:08 PM) Salty was well above average at throwing people out stealing. I agree with Murphy.. I do think Alexei will turn it around because of his defense in the past. Abreu is more athletic than we think, according to several scouts. I agree that the defense is bad but I think it's better than last years with De Aza and Beckham gone. HUH???? Salty had a 21% success rate at throwing out basestealers. That ranked him 35th out of 40 AL catchers. Now some only caught limited games but to put in perspective, he was less successful than Flowers and Phegley.
  15. QUOTE (ChiSoxFan05 @ Nov 9, 2013 -> 12:46 PM) I haven't done one of these for awhile, so my lineup would be: OFFSEASON MOVES Abreu 6 yrs Saltalamacchia 2 yrs Joe Smith 3 yrs Dave Purcey 1 yr De Aza and Kevin Vance for Daniel Murphy and a A bum 1. Alexei Ramirez .285/9/44 [r] 2. Daniel Murphy .294/16/82 (L) 3. Jose Abreu .282/18/70 [r] 4. Adam Dunn .203/38/88 (L) 5. Avisail Garcia .294/16/75 [r] 6. Dayan Viciedo .256/22/60 [r] 7. Jarrod Saltalamacchia .264/14/54 (S) 8. Conneff Gillapenger Platoon .249/15/46 [l/r] 9. Jordan Danks .257/8/46 [l] The lefty/righty combo would drive opponents insane. That would have to be the worst defensive team in baseball. You do not believe in strenth up the middle?? Salty and Murphy were two of the worst defensively at their positions. Alexei was also bad but somehow some think he will have a miracle cure and Danks may be okay in center. We can expect Abreu to have a learning curve year and hopefully he can eventually play 1st. The pitchers may go on strike by May 1st w that defense.
  16. QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 4, 2013 -> 06:15 PM) I agree. The players I mentioned I feel like can be the core of the offense. And then just find or develop other player thy fit around them or even become part of the core. Hopefully Thompson an Hawkins figure it out this year in the minors. I trust the Sox to develop pitching. Go after Gatewood at #3 and he can be apart of this in a couple years to replace Alexei. When considering Salty, he was horrible throwing out runners, worse % than Phegley and Flowers. Ross the other Red Sox catcher was one of the best in the league so the problem was not with their staff.
  17. QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 31, 2013 -> 11:26 AM) I'm interested in how good the BoSox are going to be next year. Have a lot of expired contracts as well as guys that seemed to play over their heads last year I think they will be loaded next year. They have expired contracts but they also add two young studs in Bradley and Bogaerts to replace Ellsbury and Drew. They had 3 relief pitchers on the DL who will return next year. Their AAA and AA teams have 3 or 4 highly rated prospects after the 2 mentioned. Heck, Peavy is their No 5 starter at this point. My guess is they resign Salty and Napoli. I think they are a heavy favorite to repeat in AL
  18. QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Oct 31, 2013 -> 05:51 PM) I think Ellsbury is a great fit. Great baserunner/stealer, solid defense , hits for a decent average. Just a heady pro for CF or even LF if the Sox pick up someone like Bourjos in a trade. Saves his legs which are his greatest asset if you stick him in a corner . I can always hope no matter what Merkin writes or Hahn says in public . You sign Ellsbury, trade for Kendrick and Bourjos then the lineup starts looking very solid with good speed and defense and probably with a payroll not any higher than last year if we can avoid giving Konerko any money. Pick up a cheap switch hitting catcher like Brayan Pena to add to the Cuban Connection or Dioner Navarro who would be a pretty reasonable free agent pickup . I think Ellsbury is a pipe dream. He already turned down 5/$75 mil. Boras will probably want 6/$120 and after Abreu I doubt the Sox will go that high.
  19. QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 31, 2013 -> 07:03 PM) Those are both god awful deals. Dodgers would be lucky if we just ate Ethier's entire contract. Alexei is leaps and bounds better than Freese. Freese for Alexei would be terrible. Freese had a bad year and a worse World Series. You don't trade to fill a hole and create another. Freese may be better than what we have for 3rd but then you would have to give up an asset to get another shortstop.
  20. QUOTE (chw42 @ Oct 28, 2013 -> 11:37 PM) I think the Cards are going to win game 6 with Wacha going. The Sox would be smart to go with Lackey in game 7 and not game 6. Lackey bested Verlander in the ALCS so I don't think they will switch away from Wacha. Cards look like a defeated team .
  21. QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 24, 2013 -> 02:12 PM) Too late to close the barn door when the cow is already eating the azaleas. Not sure if Lester had a foreign substance. But on the Pop-up at the mound, the Cards battery looked like they had one between innings.
  22. I think it is interetsing to see how the 2 best teams in baseball were built. Some smart moves, good drafting and both teams got lucky with some moves. http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/i...-sox-were-built http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/i...nals-were-built
  23. QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 22, 2013 -> 12:08 PM) The Rays actually have a pretty solid fan base, but that stadium is in a terrible location. They make it to the playoff games, but it's just too far a drive on a Wednesday night. I have been to about 10 Rays games in the last 3-4 years. They have a weak fan base and the stadium is not in a terrible location. There is little or no traffic getting to their stadium. It is pretty easy on and off the freeway. Since it is indoor, there is no weather excuse. The Tampa Bay Bucs football team is the 2nd worst draw in the NFL. The area does not have enough fans to support their teams. The transplants continue to root for their home teams and are only casual fans who attend a few games. I am one of them who goes to a few April Rays games before I head north and have yet to go to a Bucs game.
  24. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 20, 2013 -> 03:29 PM) If the White Sox are wrong on this one then people will lose their jobs. I'm content with that. Kenny and Rick just put $70 million of other people's money on the line as a bet on this guy. If they lose the bet the team loses for another 2-3 years and then the White Sox are looking for a fresh set of voices in their front office. Based on what??? Was Kenny wrong on Dunn??? I think Dunn was a disappointment but Kenny is still there. Based on where the White Sox stand, I think this is a chance they had to take.
  25. QUOTE (chw42 @ Oct 20, 2013 -> 01:47 AM) In no world should Victorino not start on the White Sox. The guy put up a .353 wOBA this year and a .351 OBP. He also played incredible defense in RF this year and can probably be pretty good in center. I don't care if he's going to be 33 next year, if you can get him at the right price, get him. He just signed a 3 year deal. So he has $26 Mil over 2 years left. He can't switch hit due to injuries. There is no talk in New England they would move him and I wouldn't want him especially if he needs off-season surgery.
×
×
  • Create New...