Bob Sacamano

Just please turnover most of this roster. Whatever it takes. Basically impossible to get rid of Benintendi and Moncada without eating a lot of money, though.

It's more the fact that it is the holiday season me thinks.

Do it

Not many of those guys would be. Definitely hold onto some of the higher upside arms but feel like Padilla, Peralta, Navarro, Foster can go.

They had to add the 60-day IL guys back to the roster: Foster, Romy, Davis Martin.

He has acknowledged in a prior post that the price is lesser after 2023 than 2022.

They won’t do that. But yeah, that would definitely be the final straw.

Anyone who says they aren’t going to watch because Benetti left isn’t really serious. They will still watch. Don’t take that take too seriously.

Can you blame him with the goofball product on the field?

When is the last time the Sox had a 2 WAR season from RF? haha

Take Tweets from that account with a gigantic grain of salt.

Man, I wish they didn’t have Benintendi on this roster.

The only point you need.

Anyone who says it truly isn't serious. Let's be honest. The level of play is likely to have more impact (it won't be good).

Yeah, I thought he would have left for a regular national job.

Agreed. Especially since they sent down Colas...twice (and one of the times being with expanded rosters).

When your bar is "at least he got up off his seat,"....oh boy.

The ironic part is, if you invest in the scouting and analytics and cut back on the reps, you would probably sell more tickets if the team is better. Is it even necessary to have ticket reps these days compared to before internet? Now you can just jump on and buy whatever plan you want. Definitely not necessary to have a bigger sales rep staff compared to the other two.

He does say that about the team he was the Farm System Director (or whatever the f*** the title was).

Until Ramos forces his way onto the roster, there’s no one else to consistently play at 3B. You go that route if you still had Burger or someone else who could use the at bats.

Exactly. They were planning on playing him.

Yeah not a lot of teams could pull it off. Unless you’re open to guys who were rookies this past season as well.

Who would the Dodgers have even wanted for a guy like Outman? Dodgers were pretty thin in the OF and needed him. Why would they deal him for nothing? Don’t really match up now and likely not last year. You can’t just say “we should trade for this guy” like we’re some team that has a bunch of guys that teams would want. Varsho is a terrible example as Diamondbacks received a top catching prospect and an MLB OF’r. Sox couldn’t do a deal like that a year ago. Easy to suggest what guys should be traded for but you conveniently leave off who you would offer up from the Sox. Hmmm Edit: I'll give you props on Stone Garrett since that dude could have been signed as a free agent (of course, after 29 teams passed on him without claiming him).

Idk, their plan for next couple years is probably the “catch lightning in a bottle” approach after filling holes. I guess with that (admittedly s%*#) plan, keeping Robert in CF and 2/3 spot is great.

I agree. No one will meet the price now. The price 2 years closer to free agency? Sure, as the price would decrease from what it is now.