Jump to content

whitesoxfan99

Members
  • Posts

    11,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whitesoxfan99

  1. She was widely criticized for that but there’s also a pretty big big difference between calling Trump a faker and calling out the fact he didn’t turn over his tax returns and spouting off conspiracy theories and attacking an entire political party.
  2. He lied about not drinking on weekdays during the summer. There is not a single bit of evidence of the existence of a drinking game called devil's triangle, while there are mountains of evidence about the sexual meaning of the phrase. We have accounts from a college friend of his about how he used the term boofing. His statement on this was obviously bullshit. We have third party accounts of Kavanaugh drinking heavily and throwing up. We have the Renate limerick written elsewhere in his yearbook, plus a basic knowledge of what HS boys talk about. Meanwhile his accounts of all of these cases are somewhere between implausible and ludicrous, and have no supporting evidence. Edit: And that is just based what he said during the most recent hearing alone. He was also evasive and refused to answer questions on numerous occasions which is also evidence of someone lying/hiding the truth.
  3. I'm done with discussing this with a willfully ignorant person.
  4. Not sufficient to convict in a court of law most likely (maybe if they actually investigated) but enough to cast serious doubt as to Kavanaugh (although his blatant lies under oath should be disqualifying by themselves). https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/will-the-fbi-ignore-testimonies-from-kavanaughs-former-classmates
  5. Except for you know, a judge repeatedly lying under oath. Which if he was a Democrat would lead to impeachment charges but, again go team GOP.
  6. Yes, because they didn't actually investigate anything.
  7. Yes, that line of questioning was grandstanding to show people that he didn't want an investigation to imply he didn't want the truth found out and they called for an investigation, which there absolutely should have been. A stall tactic only works if you are the one who gets to do the stalling though. Republicans set the parameters for the investigation and the coward Jeff Flake is ultimately the one who got the investigation going so he could have cover for his upcoming yes vote.
  8. The FBI investigation with a one week time frame and of limited scope was a stall tactic by the Democrats even though it needed to be ordered by Republicans and they set the parameters. Got it. Fantastic critical thinking. This FBI investigation was cover for Jeff Flake, Murkowski and Collins who are all cowards and were scared to vote yes. Nothing more. There is corroborating evidence about Ramirez's allegation against Kavanaugh. The FBI just was prohibited from looking into it and the GOP wouldn't let her testify before Congress. Plenty of evidence Kavanaugh has lied under oath repeatedly. The Ford allegation is absolutely a he said/she said situation but let's not act like that is the only allegation facing Kavanaugh or that he hasn't broken the law repeatedly by lying under oath. Kavanaugh has clearly demonstrated he is not suited to be a supreme court justice but go team GOP I guess. Party before country. Let me also say that Kavanaugh is not under trial, there is no presumption of innocence when you are on a job interview. My company would never have hired this guy in a million years under these circumstances but he is going to be on the Supreme Court without a real investigation. Amazing.
  9. Absolutely hilarious. Of course you can't find any one to attest to any of the allegations when you are actively refusing to interview third parties with information.
  10. I love that Trump isn't even denying the New York Times' report.
  11. The sham FBI investigation ordered by Republicans because Jeff Flake is a coward who wanted cover for his cowardice is a Democrat stall tactic. Got it.
  12. Hahahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahaahahahahaahahahaahah That's my response to your partisan nonsense.
  13. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/dozens-potential-sources-information-have-not-been-contacted-fbi-kavanaugh-n916146
  14. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/will-the-fbi-ignore-testimonies-from-kavanaughs-former-classmates I’m shocked that this is a sham allegation being conducted by the FBI. V
  15. Super lucky there. I thought Gore would just keep the bat on his shoulders and he would have been on.
  16. Well to be fair, she isn't being allowed to interview Judge for some asinine reason (maybe because Republicans know he would be a disaster so they are hiding him) and only got 5 minutes to question Kavanaugh in a situation where he was being protected by Republicans.
  17. Or ask it, get his answer where he won’t say he wants one. State for the record he won’t ask for one and doesn’t want Judge to testify and move on. Trying to get your “A Few Good Men” moment isn’t going to happen.
  18. The 5 minute format is also terrible if different people each use the time. Should have had more coherent plan for how to attack him if you were going to have each take their 5 minutes but the right way to do this if you weren’t having a prosecutor is to have the same person take the 5 minutes each time so they can follow up and continue lines of questioning.
  19. A good prosecutor who got the time for each democrat could get a lot done in that time. You just return to exactly where you left off the last time you were questioning him if a line of questioning is going well.
  20. Also, forget who it was but the guy on CNN who said women always lose in these situations was absolutely right. Yet another example just like Anita Hill that is is pointless for women to make allegations against men in power unless they have photographic evidence. Republicans yet again showing they don’t give a fuck about women.
  21. Lol. Well committing blatant perjury doesn’t matter and Flake is a fucking joke. Tries to say the right thing but in reality he is a coward.
  22. I wouldn’t go nearly that far but he was incredibly evasive yesterday which in my experience indicated someone is at least hiding the ball on something, his demeanor is terrible for a judge and while all judges are somewhat partisan you simply can’t have someone on the Supreme Court spouting off conspiracy theories.
  23. The old white Republican men had already decided their good old boy hasn’t don’t it before any testimony was heard yesterday. Stopping women from having abortions and making sure crazy people have easy access to guns and that they can keep putting up walls for minoritirs to vote is way more important than making sure a Supreme Court judge is properly vetted.
×
×
  • Create New...