Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Quintana Rumors: Round and round and round we go

Featured Replies

Somebody may have already posted this but Phil Rodgers went on MLBN earlier today and said that:

1) The Cardinals have been in contact about Q

2) The Cubs are a dark horse to watch

3) The Sox are supposedly largely looking for bats in a Q trade

  • Replies 5k
  • Views 676.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Guys...I feel like losing Quintana would hurt the most. What is everyone's thoughts on keeping him? Maybe he can be the Ace of the next good Sox team.

  • http://m.yankees.mlb.com/news/article/2123...white-sox-talk/   Official site of the Yankees reporting that the earlier reports of Robertson being included in trade talks was false.

QUOTE (Saufley @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:15 AM)
We're OK!

 

As long as the return is good.

 

Meadows Bell and Keller gogogo

QUOTE (Username @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:25 AM)
Somebody may have already posted this but Phil Rodgers went on MLBN earlier today and said that:

1) The Cardinals have been in contact about Q

2) The Cubs are a dark horse to watch

3) The Sox are supposedly largely looking for bats in a Q trade

 

Am I wrong for strongly prefering the Pirates prospects?

QUOTE (Username @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:25 AM)
Somebody may have already posted this but Phil Rodgers went on MLBN earlier today and said that:

1) The Cardinals have been in contact about Q

2) The Cubs are a dark horse to watch

3) The Sox are supposedly largely looking for bats in a Q trade

 

Did he say that they have actually had contact or just his own speculation because they have the pieces it would take?

Edited by soxfan2014

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:29 AM)
Did he say that they have actually had contact or just his own speculation because they have the pieces it would take?

 

My assumption is this is tailored to being about the Cubs/Cardinals because the only thing Phil Rogers ever talks about is Cubs/Cardinals and Arnie Munoz curveball.

QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:33 AM)
My assumption is this is tailored to being about the Cubs/Cardinals because the only thing Phil Rogers ever talks about is Cubs/Cardinals and Arnie Munoz curveball.

 

LOL

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:29 AM)
Did he say that they have actually had contact or just his own speculation because they have the pieces it would take?

 

Happ and Eloy would definitely be what the White Sox are looking for in a deal. I'd welcome the Cubs to the trade mix.

QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:33 AM)
My assumption is this is tailored to being about the Cubs/Cardinals because the only thing Phil Rogers ever talks about is Cubs/Cardinals and Arnie Munoz curveball.

 

Just FYI, I think Arnie Munoz curveball would be an interesting 4th piece in any Quintana deal.

Cardinals and Cubs getting involved to drive up the price for Pittsburgh? If any of that is real, then that is fantastic news for the Sox.

QUOTE (South Sider @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:36 AM)
Cardinals and Cubs getting involved to drive up the price for Pittsburgh? If any of that is real, then that is fantastic news for the Sox.

 

I think the Cubs part is his own speculation since they have the pieces.

QUOTE (reiks12 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:29 AM)
Am I wrong for strongly prefering the Pirates prospects?

I feel the same way.

 

I'd still rank them:

 

1. Pirates (Meadows/Glasnow)

2. Rockies (Dahl/Rodgers)

3. Yankees (Torres/Frazier)

... then the rest with a significant drop off.

 

The Rockies' interest is purely theoretical, so unless the Dodgers get involved, I am hoping it's Meadows or Frazier patrolling the OF for the White Sox next year.

Now that we know we have legitimate markets for Sale (retroactively) and Quintana, I will go on record as saying I could not handle Quintana on the Cubs. I'm sorry.

QUOTE (DirtySox @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 12:35 PM)
Happ and Eloy would definitely be what the White Sox are looking for in a deal. I'd welcome the Cubs to the trade mix.

 

Cubs would be disgusting if they got Q.

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:36 AM)
I think the Cubs part is his own speculation since they have the pieces.

 

Pretty much everything Rogers says is speculation based on what he sees in the newspaper compared against rosters

QUOTE (reiks12 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 12:29 PM)
Am I wrong for strongly prefering the Pirates prospects?

 

I don't like the Cardinals at all as a fit here. I prefer Meadows to anyone the Cubs have but the Cubs could actually put together a very good package for Q but I would need both Happ and Jimenez in that deal as a starting point.

I require Schwarber & Happ for Q.

QUOTE (whitesoxfan99 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:41 AM)
I don't like the Cardinals at all as a fit here. I prefer Meadows to anyone the Cubs have but the Cubs could actually put together a very good package for Q but I would need both Happ and Jimenez in that deal as a starting point.

 

I don't either but they serve as a useful team a la the Braves in Sale trade.

Come on Hahn, give us a nice xmas present!!

QUOTE (NCsoxfan @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 06:41 PM)
I require Schwarber & Happ for Q.

 

I'd prefer Schwarber. Jimenez and Candelario. Schwarber's value is limited in the NL. And they can't even move him to first either. He would be a logical trade piece.

QUOTE (GermanSoxFan @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:53 AM)
I'd prefer Schwarber. Jimenez and Candelario. Schwarber's value is limited in the NL. And they can't even move him to first either. He would be a logical trade piece.

 

I proposed a Happ, Jimenez and Candelario deal for Quintana as a possibility

 

I doubt either side accepts that, but as a purely baseball trade it would be a good deal for each side

QUOTE (GermanSoxFan @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 11:53 AM)
I'd prefer Schwarber. Jimenez and Candelario. Schwarber's value is limited in the NL. And they can't even move him to first either. He would be a logical trade piece.

That's exactly what I had in mind. The cubs FO knows that I'd they were to make a serious play for Q that it would cost them and they know the Sox are in the driver's seat.

 

So Theo, how desperate are you?

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 12:01 PM)
That's exactly what I had in mind. The cubs FO knows that I'd they were to make a serious play for Q that it would cost them and they know the Sox are in the driver's seat.

 

So Theo, how desperate are you?

 

I'm gonna guess not that desperate.

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 12:01 PM)
That's exactly what I had in mind. The cubs FO knows that I'd they were to make a serious play for Q that it would cost them and they know the Sox are in the driver's seat.

 

So Theo, how desperate are you?

 

 

QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 22, 2016 -> 12:02 PM)
I'm gonna guess not that desperate.

 

If they were coming off a World Series loss: desperate. I have to agree with bmags.

He's a nice piece for them because he does help bridge their pitching staff which is about to get a lot more expensive, but I doubt they would get rid of a major contributor to their offense in Schwarber and then some. Especially with Int'l FA and the Draft about to get a lot harder for them, they may be very cautious what trade chips they go after.

If we're just throwing trade ideas at the wall:

Quintana and Melky with Sox picking up half of Melky's contract for Schwarber, Jimenez and Candelario.

 

But I don't think that's realistic at all. Let's see where the Pirates rumors go and hopefully some names get leaked by either FO.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.