Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

NFL Thread 2019-2020

Featured Replies

Dan Pompei said on the radio this morning that Clinton-Dix would be an upgrade over Amos. 

I wonder if he has ever watched them play before.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 339.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • This is remarkably tone deaf to what an addict goes through on a day to day basis.   I'm not about to sit here and argue with you for feeling this way because clearly you have made up your mind, but i

  • fucking Ryan Grigson and Colts leadership not ever caring him enough to get him an OL

  • Chicago White Sox
    Chicago White Sox

    Lol...my stance is pretty clear.  I like the tools but acknowledge he has limited experience and will need time.  So far I’ve been disappointed, but unlike you I’m not looking for the medal from being

Posted Images

6 minutes ago, GoSox05 said:

Dan Pompei said on the radio this morning that Clinton-Dix would be an upgrade over Amos. 

I wonder if he has ever watched them play before.

Spoiler alert: he has

I listened to it also, they have been saying that Haha would be an upgrade because he is a ballhawk and Amos isn't, and he won't have to worry about covering as long because the bears have a much better pass rush.   Amos is awesome at run support, he is just ok at pass coverage.  Seems like haha is awful at run support and decent to good at pass coverage(I know he gets burned, I have seen the videos)

35 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said:

Spoiler alert: he has

I listened to it also, they have been saying that Haha would be an upgrade because he is a ballhawk and Amos isn't, and he won't have to worry about covering as long because the bears have a much better pass rush.   Amos is awesome at run support, he is just ok at pass coverage.  Seems like haha is awful at run support and decent to good at pass coverage(I know he gets burned, I have seen the videos)

He is actually really bad at both run stopping at pass coverage. He just takes the worst angles, I don't know what happened to him. 

Early in his career I thought he was going to be really good.  Last two years and last year especially he was so bad.  I like him, he seems like a cool dude and good locker room guy.  He just got so bad the past two years.

 

I'll take this over a player who has three or four INT, but also gives up a ton of big plays.

 

Edited by GoSox05

I'd like Haha more if Fangio was still here. He has a very good tendency to mask weaknesses on certain players. There's a reason Haha was drafted so high though. The talent is there. Just not sure if Pagano is the guy to help him unleash it. 

3 hours ago, GoSox05 said:

He is actually really bad at both run stopping at pass coverage. He just takes the worst angles, I don't know what happened to him. 

Early in his career I thought he was going to be really good.  Last two years and last year especially he was so bad.  I like him, he seems like a cool dude and good locker room guy.  He just got so bad the past two years.

 

I'll take this over a player who has three or four INT, but also gives up a ton of big plays.

 

Amos is fine as a cleanup safety. But when he was given more responsibility and more ground to cover with Eddie Jackson out, he was definitely exposed. Especially in the second half of the playoff game against the Eagles. There were 3-4 instances where a safety with better instincts and speed could have made numerous huge stops for the Bears in Amos' position. Instead, Amos kept a Eagles TD drive alive with a late hit penalty (because of the fact he has limited range) and allowed the final TD drive to continue by not even looking at Alshon Jeffrey on a third and medium conversion. I think there's a reason why the Broncos and Bears passed on him even though he got a pretty reasonable deal in the grand scheme of things. 

49 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

I'd like Haha more if Fangio was still here. He has a very good tendency to mask weaknesses on certain players. There's a reason Haha was drafted so high though. The talent is there. Just not sure if Pagano is the guy to help him unleash it. 

Pagano played strong safety came up as a DB coach and is known for helping DBs excel.

Did he overlap at Alabama with Jackson?

I like that it's a one year deal. Take a safety in the draft and see if he can replace him in a year. We need cap space to retain Eddie Jackson next year. 

3 minutes ago, Tony said:

Yeah, the one year deal part is probably the best part. I want to see the terms and see what else they can do this offseason, but this should be an OK stopgap. 

Good plan for one year. A veteran to play in a competitive year while they groom the rookie they take in the draft.  Much less likely to have big mistakes in the secomdary.

1 minute ago, Tony said:

WHAT A CAP HIT

Holy hell that's cheap. We still have 15.5 million left in cap room. 

One thing HHCD does well is he always plays.  He's never missed a game and played almost every snap when with the Packers.

Was hoping they roll the dice on Berry but HHCD will do. Can’t complain about the price at all. By my calculation they still have about $13.5M cap space (more if you count Top 51).

I wonderful if Houston is next or they are looking to trade for a contract with a team trying to free up space.

With our pass rush and the ability to play next to Eddie, pretty much any safety is gonna look good. Smart contract for both sides, he'll get paid well next year. 

43 minutes ago, Tony said:

WHAT A CAP HIT

No kidding.

7 hours ago, GoSox05 said:

He is actually really bad at both run stopping at pass coverage. He just takes the worst angles, I don't know what happened to him. 

Early in his career I thought he was going to be really good.  Last two years and last year especially he was so bad.  I like him, he seems like a cool dude and good locker room guy.  He just got so bad the past two years.

 

I'll take this over a player who has three or four INT, but also gives up a ton of big plays.

 

As I've said many times, whether it's HHCD or Amos, they were going to be one of the 2 or 3 worst players on the defense. It's about not being a complete fuck up out there and everything will be fine.

As for PFF, that website is nonsense and anyone who trusts those "scouting reports" and "game recaps" are just as goofy.

Lmao the Raiders paid Jordy Nelson a $3M roster bonus and then cut him today.  GRUDENED

4 minutes ago, soxfan49 said:

As I've said many times, whether it's HHCD or Amos, they were going to be one of the 2 or 3 worst players on the defense. It's about not being a complete fuck up out there and everything will be fine.

As for PFF, that website is nonsense and anyone who trusts those "scouting reports" and "game recaps" are just as goofy.

I think it correct. It just depends on which style you prefer, the safe no big plays either way or the risky big play turnover and give up a few big plays. Both have 5heir positives and negatives. 

8 minutes ago, soxfan49 said:

As I've said many times, whether it's HHCD or Amos, they were going to be one of the 2 or 3 worst players on the defense. It's about not being a complete fuck up out there and everything will be fine.

As for PFF, that website is nonsense and anyone who trusts those "scouting reports" and "game recaps" are just as goofy.

It's a tool for measuring players.  Just like reports by Football Outsiders. 

It's not the end all be all, but I haven't seen anyone say it's complete nonsense.

INT are like sacks, they only tell part of the story. 

Kyler Fackrell had two less sacks than Khalil Mack, that doesn't mean they are anywhere in the same ballpark as players. 

These players play over 600 snaps.  The difference in talent doesn't come down to a hand full of plays. 

 

4 hours ago, GoSox05 said:

It's a tool for measuring players.  Just like reports by Football Outsiders. 

It's not the end all be all, but I haven't seen anyone say it's complete nonsense.

At the final second of a game they have complete player by player grades. No write ups, no commentary, just an imaginary grade based on nothing. For this to be possible they'd literally have to employ over 820 people to do this, and so I think it's more of a guess on how they played. Even if they do have that large of a staff, who are the people grading them? Are they professionals? For instance they didn't have Mack as a top 5 NFL defender through the first 6 weeks of the season last year. A few years ago that had Amos as a better SS than Kam Chancellor. It's a joke.

Edited by soxfan49

6 hours ago, Tony said:

WHAT A CAP HIT

Now this I like. I said all along, with where the Bears were, I wanted them to wade in the weeds.  

I still want the Bears to bring in TJ Yeldon. I think he could be a Thomas Jones-type signing. 

Aside from Houston, I’d love if Bears could still bring back Callahan. Getting good depth at CB after how healthy they all were last year would be reassuring.

Getting to 2-3 days later you mostly assume the guys will come relatively cheap.

1 minute ago, Tony said:

I'm somewhat surprised Bryce wasn't signed during the initial flurry of moves. They might be able to get him back now, which I agree, would be really nice. 

Still want that pass rusher. 

The one part of it I'm interested in is Pagano, who from what I understand manufactures pressure from all over. Skrine and Callahan are both good pass rushers from the slot, adding more secondary rushers could be interesting, especially where with Roquan you have some nice interior pass rushing lbs.

You know, the flurry is over now and I actually think I'm comfortable in this spread the money around approach. Not crazy with Skrine deal but whatever.

We got great impact from players like Lynch last year in depth roles. I think at this point I don't see him getting more than a 1 year deal. He could come back, or you could go after Shane Ray, who had a similar profile to lynch the previous year and is given a great role to try and be productive.

I wonder how you could spread around a bunch of 1 year 4-5 mill deals. I'm not sure I wouldn't be happy if we could get maybe Jared Cook, Shane Ray, Ronald Darby/cb, Spencer Ware and a swing G/T. 

It lets them focus draft on some high priority targets and protects against the worst thing that can happen next year which is a lot of injuries.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.