Jump to content

Lindblom to Brewcrew


ChiSox59
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Heads22 changed the title to Lindblom to Brewcrew

Huh? Getting a 24 year old who’s hit 19 or 20 homeruns every year he’s been in the league with OPS and SLG trending upward is despised, but paying $9 million a year for the next three for a guy who’s pitched 10 IP since 2014 is what some people were actually excited about?

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Sir said:

Huh? Getting a 24 year old who’s hit 19 or 20 homeruns every year he’s been in the league with OPS and SLG trending upward is despised, but paying $9 million a year for the next three for a guy who’s pitched 10 IP since 2014 is what some people were actually excited about?

Dig a little deeper there, Sir.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The Sir said:

Oh. He’s a 32 year old who spent a couple of years dominating Asian ball but sucks in the USA. Yeah, I’m good.

Lol, he is an incredibly interesting guy a $3M AAV.  You don't even need him to be very good to come out ahead on that deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, The Sir said:

Huh? Getting a 24 year old who’s hit 19 or 20 homeruns every year he’s been in the league with OPS and SLG trending upward is despised, but paying $9 million a year for the next three for a guy who’s pitched 10 IP since 2014 is what some people were actually excited about?

It's not $9 mill a year lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, The Sir said:

Huh? Getting a 24 year old who’s hit 19 or 20 homeruns every year he’s been in the league with OPS and SLG trending upward is despised, but paying $9 million a year for the next three for a guy who’s pitched 10 IP since 2014 is what some people were actually excited about?

It’s $9.125 million for the entire 3 years.  The Sox wasted a lot more money than that last offseason on Alonso, Jay, and Santana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

It’s $9.125 million for the entire 3 years.  The Sox wasted a lot more money than that last offseason on Alonso, Jay, and Santana.

Yeah, I reread and noticed that. My bad. And while our idiotic use of money is indefensible, I still wouldn't go for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, The Sir said:

Huh? Getting a 24 year old who’s hit 19 or 20 homeruns every year he’s been in the league with OPS and SLG trending upward is despised, but paying $9 million a year for the next three for a guy who’s pitched 10 IP since 2014 is what some people were actually excited about?

Lol are you serious 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Eminor3rd said:

Lol are you serious 

Yes, I’m absolutely serious. This dude is 32 and has been total garbage in MLB. The only place he’s produced is Asia. He’s a AAAA player. You might point out that he’s cheap but so is Nomar Mazara. The difference is that Mazara at worst will hit 20 bombs with a mid 700s OPS, pulled down by a weakness against LHP, and at best could blossom into his full potential. Lindblom isn’t going to do that. This guy is what he is. Soxtalk has weird fetishes and dislikes.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Sir said:

Yes, I’m absolutely serious. This dude is 32 and has been total garbage in MLB. The only place he’s produced is Asia. He’s a AAAA player. You might point out that he’s cheap but so is Nomar Mazara. The difference is that Mazara at worst will hit 20 bombs with a mid 700s OPS, pulled down by a weakness against LHP, and at best could blossom into his full potential. Lindblom isn’t going to do that. This guy is what he is. Soxtalk has weird fetishes and dislikes.

You’ve got a shockingly strong opinion of Josh Lindblom for someone who appears to know nothing about Josh limblom. 

Weird how Mazara could “blossom to his full potential” But lindblom couldn’t possibly have gotten any better in the three years since the stats you’re referencing. 

Edited by Eminor3rd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Eminor3rd said:

You’ve got a shockingly strong opinion of Josh Lindblom for someone who appears to know nothing about Josh limblom. 

Weird how Mazara could “blossom to his full potential” But lindblom couldn’t possibly have gotten any better in the three years since the stats you’re referencing. 

He’s 32. He’s never been successful in MLB. Mazara is 24 and has 79 homeruns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Sir said:

He’s 32. He’s never been successful in MLB. Mazara is 24 and has 79 homeruns.

Mazara is a bad baseball player.  It’s cool he has 79 HRs by the age of 24, but he legit sucks at everything else.  And honestly, 20 HRs isn’t good for a corner OF in the juiced ball era.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Mazara is a bad baseball player.  It’s cool he has 79 HRs by the age of 24, but he legit sucks at everything else.  And honestly, 20 HRs isn’t good for a corner OF in the juiced ball era.

Exactly.  A crappy defensive right fielder who can’t OPS over .800 blows, and he hasn’t done that once in four seasons.

35 year old Brett freaking Gardner put up an .829 OPS last season.

Edited by Moan4Yoan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...