Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Sox/Pederson speculation via CSN

Featured Replies

  • Replies 82
  • Views 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Give Ozuna, who teams feel is a DH, $100 million. Trade Vaughn. This is lunacy. Why do posters want the Sox window to be open as short as possible. We put up with losing to get guys like Vaughn, not t

  • michelangelosmonkey
    michelangelosmonkey

    Phillies were like us just a year earlier and since 2017 signed Arietta, Wheeler, Harper, McCuthchen and Santana for $630 million...and that got them two year where they were a combined four games und

  • Ozuna is not a fit on this roster. He can’t play defense and hits from the wrong side and blocks our best prospect. 

Joc is such an obvious fit. Signing Joc and Bauer is the way to go. 

A Joc/Engel or Leury platoon would give you similar production to Springer at a fraction of the cost/risk involved. It almost makes too much sense for the Sox to do it.

Edited by GermanSoxFan

1 hour ago, Yearnin' for Yermin said:

Joc is such an obvious fit. Signing Joc and Bauer is the way to go. 

That should be the plan, but not optimistic the old man will pony up for Bauer.

3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

That should be the plan, but not optimistic the old man will pony up for Bauer.

I think he wants to sign Bauer. I just think Bauer wants to be in LA first and then Boston. 

47 minutes ago, GermanSoxFan said:

A Joc/Engel or Leury platoon would give you similar production to Springer at a fraction of the cost/risk involved. It almost makes too much sense for the Sox to do it.

I see the premise here but Springer is just cut from a different cloth. If no Bauer, I want him. 

I’d only be okay with Joc if it means they signed Ozuna to DH. They need a big bat at one of the 2 spots. Joc is nothing more than a band aid in my opinion. They need to be prepared for an Abreu regression and Joc doesn’t make up for that. 

Edited by Rey21

25 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

I’d only be okay with Joc if it means they signed Ozuna to DH. They need a big bat at one of the 2 spots. Joc is nothing more than a band aid in my opinion. They need to be prepared for an Abreu regression and Joc doesn’t make up for that. 

You forgetting about Vaughn? They think he's MLB ready. 

Just now, Jack Parkman said:

You forgetting about Vaughn? They think he's MLB ready. 

Right now I’d rather have Ozuna because he’s already proven. Vaughn may be a superstar and hell sign Ozuna and keep Vaughn, you could never have enough hitting. 

2 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

Right now I’d rather have Ozuna because he’s already proven. Vaughn may be a superstar and hell sign Ozuna and keep Vaughn, you could never have enough hitting. 

They could, theoretically, keep Vaughn down another season....idk if that's a good idea, but whatever. If that's the case, I see them signing Michael Brantley for DH. 

I do think that whomever suggested a Pederson/Engel/Garcia platoon for a fraction of the price of Springer has a really good point. 

Edited by Jack Parkman

54 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

I’d only be okay with Joc if it means they signed Ozuna to DH. They need a big bat at one of the 2 spots. Joc is nothing more than a band aid in my opinion. They need to be prepared for an Abreu regression and Joc doesn’t make up for that. 

Ozuna is not a fit on this roster. 

1 minute ago, ChiSox59 said:

Ozuna is not a fit on this roster. 

What?

25 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

They could, theoretically, keep Vaughn down another season....idk if that's a good idea, but whatever. If that's the case, I see them signing Michael Brantley for DH. 

I do think that whomever suggested a Pederson/Engel/Garcia platoon for a fraction of the price of Springer has a really good point. 

I’m fine with Brantley as long as it means Springer is here as well. I know I sound like a unrealistic jag bag but Jerry has to spend. 
I’ll be fine with a platoon in RF as long as they have Ozuna. They just again need a another big bopper in the lineup. 

5 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

What?

Ozuna is not a fit on this roster.

He can’t play defense and hits from the wrong side and blocks our best prospect. 

What would a joc deal look like? I feel like he’s one guy we have been talking about forever...

10 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

What?

Unless you plan on trading Vaughn for pitching, paying Ozuna to DH and maybe rotate with Eloy in LF is a poor use of resources.  Fantastic bat, but right handed and not a RF.

1 minute ago, SouthWallace said:

Unless you plan on trading Vaughn for pitching, paying Ozuna to DH and maybe rotate with Eloy in LF is a poor use of resources.  Fantastic bat, but right handed and not a RF.

If he was anything like last year it definitely wouldn’t be a poor use of resources, again this is assuming they’re not signing Springer. Signing Ozuna makes, or should make Vaughn expendable in search for pitching. 

35 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

I’m fine with Brantley as long as it means Springer is here as well. I know I sound like a unrealistic jag bag but Jerry has to spend. 
I’ll be fine with a platoon in RF as long as they have Ozuna. They just again need a another big bopper in the lineup. 

I think it will be Brantley/Pederson and one from each pair of Quintana/Odorizzi and Richards/Archer

Edited by Jack Parkman

11 minutes ago, Rey21 said:

If he was anything like last year it definitely wouldn’t be a poor use of resources, again this is assuming they’re not signing Springer. Signing Ozuna makes, or should make Vaughn expendable in search for pitching. 

Ok great, he's still a DH only bat at this point, and you still need a RF, a closer, a backup catcher, and a 4th starter; all assuming you have acquired a cost controlled #3 starter or better for a package headlined by Vaughn.  It just doesn't seem like a smart use of available resources, nor does it seem feasible to me.  

Just now, SouthWallace said:

Ok great, he's still a DH only bat at this point, and you still need a RF, a closer, a backup catcher, and a 4th starter; all assuming you have acquired a cost controlled #3 starter or better for a package headlined by Vaughn.  It just doesn't seem like a smart use of available resources, nor does it seem feasible to me.  

I think they're going to give Collins a look at backup catcher. 

3 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

I think it will be Brantley/Pederson and one from each pair of Quintana/Odorizzi and Richards/Archer

And that is Jerry’s definition of never finishing better than 2nd. Would tie a bow on an insanely bad offseason for this team although if I had to choose from this it would be Brantley, Odorizzi, and find the 2nd pitcher via trade

Edited by HahnsKiddieTable

29 minutes ago, HakunaMachado said:

What would a joc deal look like? I feel like he’s one guy we have been talking about forever...

Prolly 1 yr deal because he wants to reestablish his value and it gives Chicago a chance to see if Rutherford can become something. 

1 minute ago, HahnsKiddieTable said:

And that is Jerry’s definition of never finishing better than 2nd. Would tie a bow on an insanely bad offseason for this team

Jerry has been whining to the media about losing money for months, I can't see him playing at the big boy table this winter. 

VAUGHN will be the DH. And it wouldn't surprise me if he signs an contract extension like Robert and Eloy. Lock him up long term for cheap. There I said it

Edited by SoxSteve

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.