Was DFA’d by the Guardians. Unless they work out a deal or he’s claimed on waivers by another team willing to roster him, he’ll be back.

Edited Sunday at 03:38 PM2 days by Lukakke Appling

As a name from the past, Dayán Viciedo is retiring. I had no clue he played 11 years in Japan after leaving the Sox/MLB after 2015.

47 minutes ago, Lukakke Appling said:

Was DFA’d by the Guardians. Unless they work out a deal or he’s claimed on waivers by another team willing to roster him, he’ll be back.

Incorrect. He has to be offered back to Sox before other teams can claim him, being a rule 5 pick

6 minutes ago, BamaDoc said:

As a name from the past, Dayán Viciedo is retiring. I had no clue he played 11 years in Japan after leaving the Sox/MLB after 2015.

Fun fact….I own a Viciedo jersey! Thought he was going to be the real deal and bought one in my younger years. Who would have thought him and Tank Johnson on the Bears would have both flopped?

3 minutes ago, 46DidIt said:

Incorrect. He has to be offered back to Sox before other teams can claim him, being a rule 5 pick

Cleveland picked up Pallette from the White Sox in the Rule 5 draft. As part of the standard DFA process, the club has five days to trade him or place him on waivers. If another team makes a move to add Pallette, they’ll take on the Rule 5 requirements. If Pallette passes through waivers, he’ll be offered back to Chicago.

MLB Trade Rumors

Guardians Designate Peyton Pallette For Assignment, Recal...

The Guardians have made a bullpen move, designating Peyton Pallette for assignment and recalling Logan Allen.

Edited Sunday at 04:29 PM2 days by Lukakke Appling

Am I wrong in remembering he was looking good early this season?

Edited Sunday at 05:06 PM2 days by wegner

Pallette does not throw enough strikes. That has been his problem for a while. Once mlb hitters figured that out, he was toast. I hope he figures it out, but he nibbles with breaking stuff rather than attacking the zone early and then using spin to finish guys off. 16 bb in 20 IP just not gonna cut it.

21 minutes ago, wegner said:

Am I wrong in remembering he was looking good early this season?

I wasn’t really following him, but I do seem to remember a decent amount of Getz hate for making a stupid move to leave Pallette exposed.

1 hour ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

I wasn’t really following him, but I do seem to remember a decent amount of Getz hate for making a stupid move to leave Pallette exposed.

Looked bad at first but we’re seeing why they didn’t protect him. AAAA guy unless he learns to control the zone better

3 hours ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

I wasn’t really following him, but I do seem to remember a decent amount of Getz hate for making a stupid move to leave Pallette exposed.

For me, the issue was using two 40 man spots on Rule 5 guys without options while letting the Guardians get a chance to work their magic with Pallette who had options left. And honestly, I stand by the criticism, even if relatively small in the grand scheme of things.

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

For me, the issue was using two 40 man spots on Rule 5 guys without options while letting the Guardians get a chance to work their magic with Pallette who had options left. And honestly, I stand by the criticism, even if relatively small in the grand scheme of things.

I get what you’re saying, and I honestly don’t think Peyton Pallettte is worthy of an on going discussion…BUT is it not possible that the Sox internal scouting was correct? I don’t think it should be considered a mistake to prefer to gamble on an arm you don’t know vs 1 the team has been developing and knows isn’t remotely consistent enough to be productive.

Sox send a sleeper agent to undermine and steal info from our division rival and you're mad?

17 minutes ago, Jake said:

Sox send a sleeper agent to undermine and steal info from our division rival and you're mad?

Getz is playing 4D chess and the other GMs are playing checkers.

1 hour ago, DoUEvenShift said:

Getz is playing 4D chess and the other GMs are playing checkers.

While the Dodgers are passing Go and collecting $2,000,000

18 minutes ago, Texsox said:

While the Dodgers are passing Go and collecting $2,000,000

I thought that was the recent Strait of Hormuz ship toll, lol.

11 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

I thought that was the recent Strait of Hormuz ship toll, lol.

In crypto.

Out of the frying pan and directly into the fire…

21 hours ago, almagest said:

Looked bad at first but we’re seeing why they didn’t protect him. AAAA guy unless he learns to control the zone better

That's half of the Sox pitching staff right now (3/4?).
That said, they didn't protect him when they had plenty of room, so I guess they don't want him back.

9 hours ago, GreenSox said:

That's half of the Sox pitching staff right now (3/4?).
That said, they didn't protect him when they had plenty of room, so I guess they don't want him back.

They wouldn’t have to add him to the 40-man, so I don’t see why they wouldn’t take him back.

2 minutes ago, Lukakke Appling said:

They wouldn’t have to add him to the 40-man, so I don’t see why they wouldn’t take him back.

Someone is not paying close enough attention (GS) to their lack of middle relief options available internally right now.

Hopefully he can take advantage of the new opportunity with Sox.

If they were that high on Peoples or whoever, they would probably be up right now already.

Edited yesterday at 02:29 AM1 day by caulfield12

12 hours ago, GreenSox said:

That's half of the Sox pitching staff right now (3/4?).
That said, they didn't protect him when they had plenty of room, so I guess they don't want him back.

They will certainly take him back for $25k

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

They will certainly take him back for $25k

Maybe the one number in mlb that hasn't inflated in the past thirty years or so...

7 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

They will certainly take him back for $25k

And don’t have to add to 40-man so definitely.

1 hour ago, Bob Sacamano said:

And don’t have to add to 40-man so definitely.

Exactly.