31 minutes ago31 min 1 hour ago, WhiteSox2023 said:Huh? So Getz is refusing to spend money even though he can? I’m not buying that. There’s a reason Getz traded for Castillo — because he thought he still had ace potential and knew he can’t afford one in free agency.Not sure what’s not clear here. We spent a lot of money at the deadline. Getz didn’t add a second SP because he was prospect hugging. Jerry is not the reason we didn’t add two SPs at the deadline.
30 minutes ago30 min 1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:Not sure what’s not clear here. We spent a lot of money at the deadline. Getz didn’t add a second SP because he was prospect hugging. Jerry is not the reason we didn’t add two SPs at the deadline.I would love to see your definition of six inches then, because our definitions of "a lot" apparently aren't very close to each other.
27 minutes ago27 min 4 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:I would love to see your definition of six inches then, because our definitions of "a lot" apparently aren't very close to each other.How many teams spent more than us financially than us at the deadline?
25 minutes ago25 min 2 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:How many teams spent more than us financially than us at the deadline?We added one terrible and short term contract that we had to water down. Hooray for us.
20 minutes ago20 min 5 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:We added one terrible and short term contract that we had to water down. Hooray for us.Keep moving them goalposts brother…
19 minutes ago19 min 1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:Keep moving them goalposts brother…No, moving the goalposts is dragging other teams into this as a cover for the Sox not spending at the deadline.
18 minutes ago18 min 38 minutes ago, Bonemer, I Hardly Know Her said:I love boob! (And boobs)So they didn't want Peralta during the season and now they want him after?
17 minutes ago17 min 1 hour ago, Sleepy Harold said:Maybe this means they're moving on from Iglesias.
16 minutes ago16 min 2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:No, moving the goalposts is dragging other teams into this as a cover for the Sox not spending at the deadline.lol…what in the f*** are you talking about? You are so broken from years of being a Sox fan under Jerry that you just scream “cheap ass Jerry” even in the rare moments he isn’t being. Not going waste one more second arguing for something that isn’t even debatable.
14 minutes ago14 min 1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:lol…what in the f*** are you talking about? You are so broken from years of being a Sox fan under Jerry that you just scream “cheap ass Jerry” even in the rare moments he isn’t being. Not going waste one more second arguing for something that isn’t even debatable.YOu are right that this isn't debatable. The Sox added one real salary at the deadline, and they even had to add a more significant prospect to get them to take on Dominguez, for a team 29th in major league payroll. It's all there.
14 minutes ago14 min 4 minutes ago, chw42 said:So they didn't want Peralta during the season and now they want him after?They wanted Tampa to fix him. 4d chess. Keep up.
11 minutes ago11 min 20 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:Not sure what’s not clear here. We spent a lot of money at the deadline. Getz didn’t add a second SP because he was prospect hugging. Jerry is not the reason we didn’t add two SPs at the deadline.I wish we would have added 0 SP at the deadline based on the results of the final 2 months and what said player is making 😭😭😭 Edited 11 minutes ago11 min by Bob Sacamano
11 minutes ago11 min FWIW, I don't have an issue with either King or Peralta. But their values will be inflated from how well they pitched in the postseason. I don't think we should take 20 innings pitched in the playoffs that seriously. It really isn't an indicator of future success.
10 minutes ago10 min 1 minute ago, chw42 said:FWIW, I don't have an issue with either King or Peralta. But their values will be inflated from how well they pitched in the postseason. I don't think we should take 20 innings pitched in the playoffs that seriously. It really isn't an indicator of future success.I was beating the King drum before the post season. And Peralta was better instantly after being traded from a bad Mets defensive team Edited 10 minutes ago10 min by Bob Sacamano
7 minutes ago7 min 2 minutes ago, chw42 said:FWIW, I don't have an issue with either King or Peralta. But their values will be inflated from how well they pitched in the postseason. I don't think we should take 20 innings pitched in the playoffs that seriously. It really isn't an indicator of future success.King is about 15 innings over his previous career high in 2024, which included a dozen post season innings versus this seasons 14. I guess the other half of that is that he DID get hurt in 2025. Nothing else about his 2026 is out of line with the rest of his numbers. If you view the Mets stint as an aberration, there is also nothing out of line about Peralta's numbers when compared to the rest of his years.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.