August 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (b-Rye @ Aug 29, 2009 -> 09:47 PM) So we traded cr/ap for crap Wow. I have heard some stupid things before, but that takes the cake. Peavy is crap?
August 30, 200916 yr This team is going nowhere, shut him down and let his body rest until spring training.
August 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (PeavyTime @ Aug 29, 2009 -> 10:23 PM) Wow. I have heard some stupid things before, but that takes the cake. Peavy is crap? it was a joke... take it easy mary.
August 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (PeavyTime @ Aug 29, 2009 -> 08:23 PM) Wow. I have heard some stupid things before, but that takes the cake. Peavy is crap? If there winds up being serious elbow problems with him...then yeah.
August 30, 200916 yr Is there any word on his elbow problem yesterday being new or due to the line drive he took off of it?
August 30, 200916 yr QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Aug 30, 2009 -> 11:32 PM) Is there any word on his elbow problem yesterday being new or due to the line drive he took off of it? Bad news, as it doesn't sound related to the line drive. It's unbelievably stupid that they just don't shut him down, regardless of what the tests show tomorrow. If he has a major injury to his elbow, well...I don't want to even think of that. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseb...0,2723960.story
August 31, 200916 yr There was no reason to make the Peavy trade when we did, while he was on the DL. Dumb. That's an offseason type move. Rios has simply sucked. He better get his s*** in gear. He's not hit a lick.
August 31, 200916 yr There was no reason to make the Peavy trade when we did, while he was on the DL. Dumb. That's an offseason type move. Rios has simply sucked. He better get his s*** in gear. He's not hit a lick. how do you know the prospects would have kept performing and the padres would have still traded him to us?
August 31, 200916 yr I can't say for sure of course, but don't you agree the move now looks stupid at best? The guy hasn't pitched for us, we gave up some young pitchers who might have fared better in relief roles than the scum we've put out there. The gamble was we'd be in the pennant race and he'd be the September boost we need. I hate to second guess too much but the gamble failed. We're not in the race and his presence matters not. The other guys? They might have helped. We gave up too many bodies for a guy on the DL.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:42 PM) I can't say for sure of course, but don't you agree the move now looks stupid at best? The guy hasn't pitched for us, we gave up some young pitchers who might have fared better in relief roles than the scum we've put out there. The gamble was we'd be in the pennant race and he'd be the September boost we need. I hate to second guess too much but the gamble failed. We're not in the race and his presence matters not. The other guys? They might have helped. We gave up too many bodies for a guy on the DL. Yeah, KW should have known he was gonna take a line ball off the elbow. WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!!! jeesszzuzuzzzzzz
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 01:42 PM) I can't say for sure of course, but don't you agree the move now looks stupid at best? The guy hasn't pitched for us, we gave up some young pitchers who might have fared better in relief roles than the scum we've put out there. The gamble was we'd be in the pennant race and he'd be the September boost we need. No, that was just part of the "gamble." The rest of it was that Peavy would anchor this staff for the next 3-4 seasons. Same goes for Rios. Having them on the roster was supposed to give the Sox a boost down the stretch, but the long-term implications were even more important.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (Jenksy Cat @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:45 PM) Yeah, KW should have known he was gonna take a line ball off the elbow. WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!!! jeesszzuzuzzzzzz i wouldnt call him an idiot,i think kenny made that trade for 2010 and beyond and anything we got out of him this year would be a plus,but clayton richard should would have looked nice for the last week instead of jose thats for sure.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:42 PM) I can't say for sure of course, but don't you agree the move now looks stupid at best? The guy hasn't pitched for us, we gave up some young pitchers who might have fared better in relief roles than the scum we've put out there. The gamble was we'd be in the pennant race and he'd be the September boost we need. I hate to second guess too much but the gamble failed. We're not in the race and his presence matters not. The other guys? They might have helped. We gave up too many bodies for a guy on the DL. No, your post looks kinda stupid, but the trade was still awesome. We have several years of a top flight Ace for basically nothing prospects. What a great trade.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:29 PM) There was no reason to make the Peavy trade when we did, while he was on the DL. Dumb. That's an offseason type move. Rios has simply sucked. He better get his s*** in gear. He's not hit a lick. No, it's still a genius move. He bought low on an ace who is signed for 3 more season after this one. Btw, you should go check the numbers on some of those guys we've traded.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:12 PM) No, it's still a genius move. He bought low on an ace who is signed for 3 more season after this one. Btw, you should go check the numbers on some of those guys we've traded. Richard is a back-of-the-rotation pitcher and Poreda projected to be a LOOGY or set-up guy at best. The only real downside to this deal is the money owed to Peavy over the next few years. And while it's substantial, it's nowhere near Barry Zito or Mike Hampton money.
August 31, 200916 yr They are going to announce the results of Peavy's x rays after the game. It would seem to me if there was nothing wrong, it would be announced right away. I hope I'm wrong. Peavy will comment after the results are released.
August 31, 200916 yr QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 03:48 PM) They are going to announce the results of Peavy's x rays after the game. It would seem to me if there was nothing wrong, it would be announced right away. I hope I'm wrong. Peavy will comment after the results are released. I agree. Uggh, that doesn't sound good. Thanks for the update.
September 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 10:48 PM) They are going to announce the results of Peavy's x rays after the game. It would seem to me if there was nothing wrong, it would be announced right away. I hope I'm wrong. Peavy will comment after the results are released. Please, please be due to the line drive and not due to ligament damage.
September 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 07:03 PM) Please, please be due to the line drive and not due to ligament damage. If it was ligament damage, they would probably do an MRI, wouldn't they? That is my experience with my knees and back.
September 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 1, 2009 -> 12:13 AM) If it was ligament damage, they would probably do an MRI, wouldn't they? That is my experience with my knees and back. It was an MRI they did, and that's why this is so f'n scary.
September 1, 200916 yr QUOTE (fathom @ Aug 31, 2009 -> 07:14 PM) It was an MRI they did, and that's why this is so f'n scary. Oh, thought it was just an X-ray
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.