May 19, 201015 yr Charlotte http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...chraaa_bufaaa_1 Birmingham http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...monaax_biraax_1 Winston-Salem http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...myrafa_wswafa_1 Kannapolis Gm 1: http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...hicafx_kanafx_1 Gm 2: http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/st...hicafx_kanafx_2
May 19, 201015 yr Retherford 2B 4 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 .225 Danks, Jor CF 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .234 Viciedo 1B 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 .294 Viciedo almost up to .300, Danks climbing, CJ finally with another 2 hit game. Hudson, D 5.0 8 5 5 2 8 1 5.36 Whisler 2.0 1 0 0 3 1 0 6.41 Hudson hit pretty hard. Short RF 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .388 Escobar SS 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .269 Gilmore 3B 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 .355 Lewis DH 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 .341 Sierra 2B 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .295 Greene CF 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 .328 Leesman with a very good game, 7 IP, 6 H, 0 R, 2 K's Colligan LF 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 .272 Shoemaker, B DH 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 .306 Thompson, T CF 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 .220 Gonzalez, Mi C 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .219 Vera 3B 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .267 Thompson seriously slumping, 3 K's in 3 AB's. Not unexpected. We knew he'd go through his peaks and valleys this year. 2nd game, Thompson 1/1 with a R, 2 BB's, that's better. Now at .228. Edited May 19, 201015 yr by caulfield12
May 19, 201015 yr Jake Rasner with the start - wonder if that was a one-time deal or if they are converting.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 18, 2010 -> 09:10 PM) Jake Rasner with the start - wonder if that was a one-time deal or if they are converting. He started most of last year. I don't think it's a big deal. He's moved back and forth before.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 18, 2010 -> 09:10 PM) Jake Rasner with the start - wonder if that was a one-time deal or if they are converting. Took Cassel's place in the rotation.
May 19, 201015 yr Viciedo .303 overall. OPS .873. K rate still falling (like I said it would). He's outperforming the preseason top 2 (Hudson/Flowers) while being 2 years younger than both (technically a day short of 2 years younger than Hudson, but whatever). He's my vote for top prospect.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (danman31 @ May 18, 2010 -> 10:48 PM) Viciedo .303 overall. OPS .873. K rate still falling (like I said it would). He's outperforming the preseason top 2 (Hudson/Flowers) while being 2 years younger than both (technically a day short of 2 years younger than Hudson, but whatever). He's my vote for top prospect. With Mitchell out, Viciedo seems to be sitting in the #1 spot by a decent margin right now.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (danman31 @ May 18, 2010 -> 09:48 PM) Viciedo .303 overall. OPS .873. K rate still falling (like I said it would). He's outperforming the preseason top 2 (Hudson/Flowers) while being 2 years younger than both (technically a day short of 2 years younger than Hudson, but whatever). He's my vote for top prospect. We both have been on his bandwagon for a good year now. He was both of our top prospects last year when most people here were slurping Flowers/Hudson.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (SoxAce @ May 18, 2010 -> 11:14 PM) We both have been on his bandwagon for a good year now. He was both of our top prospects last year when most people here were slurping Flowers/Hudson. It was hard to defend Viciedo over those two last year. I was starting to doubt early this year. Look at him now. He's killing the ball.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (danman31 @ May 19, 2010 -> 12:38 AM) It was hard to defend Viciedo over those two last year. I was starting to doubt early this year. Look at him now. He's killing the ball. No doubt. I'm still one of Hudson's biggest fans BTW.
May 19, 201015 yr I'd still pick Hudson over Viciedo. Even when he's struggled like his last start, he's missing a lot of bats. And the guy was rushed through. I don't see the 3 bad starts this season for Hudson as a reason to drop him below Viciedo - yet.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 19, 2010 -> 09:44 AM) I'd still pick Hudson over Viciedo. Even when he's struggled like his last start, he's missing a lot of bats. And the guy was rushed through. I don't see the 3 bad starts this season for Hudson as a reason to drop him below Viciedo - yet. I don't know if it'd be Hudson being dropped as much as the 21 year old racing the Hell past him.
May 19, 201015 yr So he can hit AAA pitching, and hit it quite well; what's next? Take Gordo's spot at 2b?
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (Jerksticks @ May 19, 2010 -> 10:23 AM) So he can hit AAA pitching, and hit it quite well; what's next? Take Gordo's spot at 2b? Give him a few months more in AAA at the least. If he keeps raking and the big league team keeps tanking, it's entirely plausible to imagine a 1b opening appearing on the big league team in July. Bringing him up, even if he struggles, won't cost him an arbitration year at that point. If somehow the big league team turns it around, then I have no issues at all with having him in AAA the whole year, and even with trying to find someone to bring in on a 1 year deal next year as a LH first baseman to take some time at the positin.
May 19, 201015 yr Nice to see Viciedo without an error in his 6 or 7 games at 3B this year. Knock on wood :-).
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (danman31 @ May 19, 2010 -> 12:38 AM) It was hard to defend Viciedo over those two last year. I was starting to doubt early this year. Look at him now. He's killing the ball. I thought considering his age and the raw talent that he had coming in, I don't know if I would call it a "bidding war" but it's not like the White Sox were the only team pursuing him, it wasn't that hard to defend him... he always had his age and adjusting to a new country (and apparently dietary options!) going for him.
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (Palehosefan @ May 19, 2010 -> 09:30 AM) Nice to see Viciedo without an error in his 6 or 7 games at 3B this year. Knock on wood :-). has he been playing at 1b at all?
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ May 19, 2010 -> 09:46 AM) has he been playing at 1b at all? Primarily
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (DirtySox @ May 19, 2010 -> 09:51 AM) Primarily good to hear, would obviously be great if he could work out at 3b, but also having a cost effective alternative at 1b isn't a terrible thing either, and it sounds like that is where he's more suited
May 19, 201015 yr BTW I have heard (actually read on Milb last week) that they are tweaking Hudson's mechanics a bit, like they did with Peavy, which would account for the slightly inconsistent outings. He still had 8 K's last night so I see no cause for worry. As a whole the starters are settling in some what; bullpen is in shambles (Whisler did have a good outing last night).
May 19, 201015 yr QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 19, 2010 -> 08:46 AM) I don't know if it'd be Hudson being dropped as much as the 21 year old racing the Hell past him. Exactly. Hudson is more of a sure thing than Viciedo, but the upside isn't quite the same.
May 20, 201015 yr QUOTE (soxbsbllvr @ May 19, 2010 -> 11:16 AM) BTW I have heard (actually read on Milb last week) that they are tweaking Hudson's mechanics a bit, like they did with Peavy, which would account for the slightly inconsistent outings. He still had 8 K's last night so I see no cause for worry. As a whole the starters are settling in some what; bullpen is in shambles (Whisler did have a good outing last night). Interesting. Good info. Thanks
May 20, 201015 yr Don't rush Viciedo. If anything we have seen that he takes a while to adjust to the higher level. He is just getting acclimated to AAA, and we would start all over if he was moved up here.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.