Jump to content

Jays @ Sox


Heads22
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 11, 2013 -> 12:40 AM)
Did Hawk just say Dunn only has two, 3 run homers in his career? If so, that's not correct

 

Hit rewind:

 

He said he has 422 home runs & only had 1 other 3 run homer.

 

Stone concurred.

 

Maybe they meant 3 home run game?

 

Seems impossible to have one other 3 run homer in his career haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Noonskadoodle @ Jun 11, 2013 -> 05:44 AM)
Hit rewind:

 

He said he has 422 home runs & only had 1 other 3 run homer.

 

Stone concurred.

 

Maybe they meant 3 home run game?

 

Seems impossible to have one other 3 run homer in his career haha

 

Baseball-reference had him with numerous 3 run homers, so that definitely wasn't accurate. He had one a few weeks ago vs Lester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Noonskadoodle @ Jun 10, 2013 -> 10:44 PM)
Hit rewind:

 

He said he has 422 home runs & only had 1 other 3 run homer.

 

Stone concurred.

 

Maybe they meant 3 home run game?

 

Seems impossible to have one other 3 run homer in his career haha

 

I can remember 3 games where he had a 3 run homer as a White Sox player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 11, 2013 -> 12:46 AM)
Baseball-reference had him with numerous 3 run homers, so that definitely wasn't accurate. He had one a few weeks ago vs Lester.

 

Game Totals

1·HR gms 349

2·HR gms 34

3·HR gms 1

Gms w/ this # = 0 are not shown.

 

Has to be what they were trying to say.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 10, 2013 -> 11:49 PM)
Clearly meant to do that, as he wanted to keep the throw low so Reed didn't lose it in the fog.

 

 

Ha, I've rarely seen a toss so accurately fired at the shin like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ Jun 10, 2013 -> 11:47 PM)
A victim of the shift?

 

I don't think so, at least not entirely. His early season struggles seemed to be because he had a higher ground ball rate and those are almost always sucked up by the shift, but now his batted ball numbers are at career averages while his BABIP is .070-.100 lower than it has ever been, even at his worst. His batted ball numbers look pretty much exactly like all of his non-White Sox seasons, EXCEPT the BABIP is lower. Doesn't make sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Jun 10, 2013 -> 11:40 PM)
Dunn's BABIP has been unsustainably low. Looks like his luck is starting to turn, as none of his other batted ball statistics really could explain why his BABIP was so low. Good for him.

 

This is where the eye test comes in. Dunn has been playing into defensive sets that use extra defenders against him. He hasn't been unlucky, just stubborn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 11, 2013 -> 07:24 AM)
This is where the eye test comes in. Dunn has been playing into defensive sets that use extra defenders against him. He hasn't been unlucky, just stubborn.

 

One of my biggest pet peeves is when Hawk among others complain about how the shift takes away another base hit from Dunn. The shift is there every single time, it's not bad luck at that pont.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...