Highly doubt it's Murphy they are after. Seems like it's definitely Frazier.

 

Yeah seems that way. I was just looking at the free agent options. I'm not sure how much the Reds will budge on his price. Although what we do have working in our favor is they almost have to trade him now because of the Chapman saga.

Would y'all be content if Hahn ended the meetings by trading for Frazier and signing Upton?

 

I'd be happy with that I think.

 

I would be extatic! Who plays SS for that team? Saladino and Sanchez being the Utility guy?

Provide them I will read them, where was wrong i beg the differ

Based on the fact that you sited a soon to be 35 year old's career fielding percentage my guess is you wouldn't quite grasp it.

Would y'all be content if Hahn ended the meetings by trading for Frazier and signing Upton?

 

I'd be happy with that I think.

 

 

I'd shipp my pants.

I would be extatic! Who plays SS for that team? Saladino and Sanchez being the Utility guy?

Honestly, I'd like to see Sanchez as the starting SS next year, but I have a feeling that Saladino will win the job.

 

I think that Sanchez could be a similar type player to Erick Aybar in his prime. Not a ton of pop, but solid contact/defense/speed/baseball IQ.

Based on the fact that you sited a soon to be 35 year old's career fielding percentage my guess is you wouldn't quite grasp it.

 

I gasp that and I read the stats you're blowing hot air deflecting I'm done lol

I'd shipp my pants.

I see what you did there.

Would y'all be content if Hahn ended the meetings by trading for Frazier and signing Upton?

 

I'd be happy with that I think.

110% content

I would be extatic! Who plays SS for that team? Saladino and Sanchez being the Utility guy?

 

I think we'd be fine with that. Saladino would play a great SS for us and you'd think his offense would improve after getting his feet wet last year. But who knows Alexi may still be in the fold for cheap, you have to think on a comfort level Chicago has to be a big selling point for him. It's all he's know basically, Chicago and Cuba.

Edited December 10, 201510 yr by Frank_Thomas35

I gasp that and I read the stats you're blowing hot air deflecting I'm done lol

 

And btw Youre only going off of age. That is your only argument

I'd shipp my pants.

 

Stop iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.......sssssstop......nnnnnnnnnnooo

It's amazing how many people were blasting KW about possibly paying too much before the deal but are praising Hahn for making a great deal afterwards.

 

They gave up minimal assets to get him. It makes you wonder why the A's were so desperate to get rid of him after only 1 year when he was an important piece of a trade.

@scottmerkin: Hahn: "We have other irons in the fire."

@scottmerkin: Hahn: "We have other irons in the fire."

 

Now brand Frazier and Upton and I'll buy season tickets

@scottmerkin: Hahn: "We have other irons in the fire."

 

 

Good...very good

 

It's good to see everyone excited again. This news made up for that so called basketball game the Bulls just played tonight.

It's amazing how many people were blasting KW about possibly paying too much before the deal but are praising Hahn for making a great deal afterwards.

 

They gave up minimal assets to get him. It makes you wonder why the A's were so desperate to get rid of him after only 1 year when he was an important piece of a trade.

He's not a good clubhouse guy from what I've heard, but I honestly don't give a rats ass about that. He has serious talent at a position the Sox seriously needed to upgrade.

 

If he plays like he can and helps the team improve, I really couldn't care less what his personality is.

And btw Youre only going off of age. That is your only argument

You kinda got me there, age is rarely an integral factor when grading a player's defensive value.

You kinda got me there, age is rarely an integral factor when grading a player's defensive value.

 

You muther f***er! You are being sarcastic!

He's not a good clubhouse guy from what I've heard, but I honestly don't give a rats ass about that. He has serious talent at a position the Sox seriously needed to upgrade.

 

If he plays like he can and helps the team improve, I really couldn't care less what his personality is.

I know. I've got friends who've worked with him. I should have put it in green.

You muther f***er! You are being sarcastic!

Never! I'm as f***ing forthright as they come.

You kinda got me there, age is rarely an integral factor when grading a player's defensive value.

 

That's because you're wrong and haven't provided nothing to back nothing up!

@scottmerkin: Hahn: "We have other irons in the fire."

 

This guy puts slams his sack on the table just like Kenny used to do.

 

How cute.

That's because you're wrong and haven't provided nothing to back nothing up!

 

Game.Set.Match

I need one of you negative miserable posters to tell me how this is a bad move. One! Please! So I can laugh at you and talk about you to my entire family as you personally being a representative for all negative moronic Soc fans that are impossible to please.

 

Maybe history is the best teacher. How many of them benefited the Sox? It's not so much what they gave up but what they got and made a negative impact. Smarj and Swisher come to mind. Still looks great on paper but since it was Oakland does history prevail?

 

Triple negatives always confuse me.