Panerista Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jan 12, 2017 -> 10:39 AM) They won't even get that IMO with his contract. I bet they mutually agree on him giving up guaranteed $$ and they cut him. My understanding is, because of the structure of the contract, a potential Romo suitor would not be liable for much of the tab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 12, 2017 -> 09:48 PM) When is the last time a NFL team played in such a small stadium? How big was the Milwaukee County Stadium the Packers played in sometimes in the 90s? The Bears played a few championship games in Chicago Stadium waaay back. Not sure about full-time, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 The early Patriots played at Fenway when it was about 37,000. What was the Wrigley capacity for the Bears? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jan 12, 2017 -> 06:09 PM) He supposedly nailed both the Niners and Rams interview. He gets a lot of credit for Cousins and is supposedly really really bright. Only question is whether he has enough experience yet to handle the big thing or not. Seems like a decent type of guy to have groom Goff. Risky, sure, but if he can get some experienced assistants and isn't overly arrogant it could end out working out brilliantly. He picked up Wade Phillips to run his Defense today which is about as good of a defensive hire as you can make. The one thing I read that seemed like a convincing argument yesterday was a list of the four youngest coaches in NFL history (name, team, age in years-days, record). Lane Kiffin OAK 32-123 5-15 Raheem Morris TB 33-10 17-31 David Shula CIN 33-101 19-52 Josh McDaniels DEN 33-144 11-17 Yes, when a team hires a new coach the team is already starting off bad, but there's also zero cases of someone at comparable age actually turning a team around. That tells me there could darn well be something more systematic here - either ownership that doesn't trust the kid or players that don't trust the kid or coaches who get theirs too early and need to be chastened once or twice. That said, 0/4 becomes 1/5 and the trend looks a lot different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 08:35 AM) He picked up Wade Phillips to run his Defense today which is about as good of a defensive hire as you can make. The one thing I read that seemed like a convincing argument yesterday was a list of the four youngest coaches in NFL history (name, team, age in years-days, record). Lane Kiffin OAK 32-123 5-15 Raheem Morris TB 33-10 17-31 David Shula CIN 33-101 19-52 Josh McDaniels DEN 33-144 11-17 Yes, when a team hires a new coach the team is already starting off bad, but there's also zero cases of someone at comparable age actually turning a team around. That tells me there could darn well be something more systematic here - either ownership that doesn't trust the kid or players that don't trust the kid or coaches who get theirs too early and need to be chastened once or twice. That said, 0/4 becomes 1/5 and the trend looks a lot different. Phillips seems like a solid hire. The only problem is he's a 3-4 guy, and they were a 4-3 team so there is going to have to be an adjustment, and he is 70 years old when the season starts. Will he stick around to see it through? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogua Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 08:45 AM) Phillips seems like a solid hire. The only problem is he's a 3-4 guy, and they were a 4-3 team so there is going to have to be an adjustment, and he is 70 years old when the season starts. Will he stick around to see it through? He runs a Phillips 3-4 though, which is a one gap system... They're going to be disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Boogua @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 08:52 AM) He runs a Phillips 3-4 though, which is a one gap system... They're going to be disgusting. I wonder if the citizens of LA are looking back fondly to the days where they had no NFL team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 09:02 AM) I wonder if the citizens of LA are looking back fondly to the days where they had no NFL team. They're back at the beach completely indifferent to there being an NFL team. Not like us Midwestern fools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 11:02 AM) I wonder if the citizens of LA are looking back fondly to the days where they had no NFL team. I think they're pretty ok with the Rams, but my sense from a lot of people is that Plaschke summed this up well yesterday on the front page of the LAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 08:45 AM) Phillips seems like a solid hire. The only problem is he's a 3-4 guy, and they were a 4-3 team so there is going to have to be an adjustment, and he is 70 years old when the season starts. Will he stick around to see it through? He doesn't really run a traditional 3-4 front. He runs a 43 under front (3T (Donald) to the weak side, 1T (Brockers) to the strong side. Wade walks up his WLB in a standup position generally though. It should work out fine. Most teams are in nickel 70% of the time anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Jordy is OUT for Sunday's game. Rodgers did fine without him Sunday, but during the season Rodgers' turnaround seemed to coincide with Jordy finally getting back to full strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 sorry but I dont think Jordy was ever even questionable. Dude broke ribs, you cant speed heal throught that in a week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 10:37 AM) Jordy is OUT for Sunday's game. Rodgers did fine without him Sunday, but during the season Rodgers' turnaround seemed to coincide with Jordy finally getting back to full strength. Should be ready for the Super Bowl if they can get past Dallas and Atlanta without him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 08:35 AM) He picked up Wade Phillips to run his Defense today which is about as good of a defensive hire as you can make. The one thing I read that seemed like a convincing argument yesterday was a list of the four youngest coaches in NFL history (name, team, age in years-days, record). Lane Kiffin OAK 32-123 5-15 Raheem Morris TB 33-10 17-31 David Shula CIN 33-101 19-52 Josh McDaniels DEN 33-144 11-17 Yes, when a team hires a new coach the team is already starting off bad, but there's also zero cases of someone at comparable age actually turning a team around. That tells me there could darn well be something more systematic here - either ownership that doesn't trust the kid or players that don't trust the kid or coaches who get theirs too early and need to be chastened once or twice. That said, 0/4 becomes 1/5 and the trend looks a lot different. http://www.profootballhof.com/football-his...hes-modern-era/ It seems like a fairly mixed bag, most turning out poorly, but how many guys coach in the NFL that don't look mediocre to poor by the end of their careers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Chiefs-Steelers moved from 12:05 to 7:20 PM on Sunday due to ice storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 That is awesome...I get to watch a sunday night game (my time). Fantastic for me (hopefully it is a good gmae). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 02:19 PM) Chiefs-Steelers moved from 12:05 to 7:20 PM on Sunday due to ice storm Screw Jason, I want to see them play in an ice storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 QUOTE (shipps @ Jan 13, 2017 -> 12:21 PM) Screw Jason, I want to see them play in an ice storm. I'm actually okay with that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 The Raiders have officially applied for relocation to Las Vegas, and the owners should vote in March. If they move, it'll be the third NFL relocation in three years. MLB has had one team move since 1972. The dumbest thing about this is apparently they're going to stay in Oakland while the stadium is built. If the Chargers can play at the StubHub Center, the Raiders can play at UNLV for a couple of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 QUOTE (WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Jan 14, 2017 -> 10:19 AM) The Raiders have officially applied for relocation to Las Vegas, and the owners should vote in March. If they move, it'll be the third NFL relocation in three years. MLB has had one team move since 1972. The dumbest thing about this is apparently they're going to stay in Oakland while the stadium is built. If the Chargers can play at the StubHub Center, the Raiders can play at UNLV for a couple of years. I don't live in my teams' TV market, but I can't imagine supporting a team after they plan to move, finalize the move, and stay in the current location in the interim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 QUOTE (Deadpool @ Jan 14, 2017 -> 11:37 AM) I don't live in my teams' TV market, but I can't imagine supporting a team after they plan to move, finalize the move, and stay in the current location in the interim. Imagine how raiders fans feel as a whole, bouncing around LA, Oakland and now (presumably) Vegas in the last 30 years or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Con te Giolito Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Hard to believe how far the NFL has fallen in just three or so years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 QUOTE (Con te Giolito @ Jan 14, 2017 -> 12:13 PM) Hard to believe how far the NFL has fallen in just three or so years. Fallen how? Like quality? I agree there. Money wise, they're as good as ever and it looks like the decline in the ratings the first half of the year was due to the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Devin Hester you are ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 That was probably the most exciting playoff game so far this year and that says a lot. Tonight probably won't be much better either. Injuries are a big blame I think, so many teams are just either missing key players or their best guys were hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts