Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Al Central wins odds

Featured Replies

Scot Gregor ‏@scotgregor 1h1 hour ago

2016 win totals from Atlantis sports book (Reno) are out. AL Central: Royals 87, Tigers 85, Indians 84, #WhiteSox 80.5, Twins 77.5

 

None of these numbers matter until Royals Review posts theirs.

Just wondering something silly - do sports books actually add things up to make sure that the total league wide wins and losses match, or do they adjust total numbers of wins based on how much people are betting on each team and just let the total number of wins float based on what people are betting?

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 11, 2016 -> 03:23 PM)
Just wondering something silly - do sports books actually add things up to make sure that the total league wide wins and losses match, or do they adjust total numbers of wins based on how much people are betting on each team and just let the total number of wins float based on what people are betting?

 

Without knowing 100% I pretty sure the lines just move with the bets so half the money is on the over and half on the under.

Just wondering something silly - do sports books actually add things up to make sure that the total league wide wins and losses match, or do they adjust total numbers of wins based on how much people are betting on each team and just let the total number of wins float based on what people are betting?

 

I doubt they add things up to make sure they average out at 81, but given the juice and the length of time the bets cover, I doubt they're off one way or the other enough to exploit that by betting the over or under on every single team.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 11, 2016 -> 08:40 PM)
Scot Gregor ‏@scotgregor 1h1 hour ago

2016 win totals from Atlantis sports book (Reno) are out. AL Central: Royals 87, Tigers 85, Indians 84, #WhiteSox 80.5, Twins 77.5

 

The Tigers are the most overrated team in baseball this year.

 

74 wins last year.

 

According to Atlanta sports book, losing Cespedes, Price, Avila, Albaquirque, Simon, Rajai Davis, Ian Kroll, and Feliz and replacing them with Cespedes, Zimmerman, K-Rod, Justin Wilson, Mark Lowe, Saltamacchia, Mike Friggin Avila, Cameron Maybin and Mike Pelfrey

 

That is not worth 11 wins.

 

Cespedes is replaced like for like by Upton

Zimmerman is not as good as Price

Salty is not as good as Avila

Pelfry and Simon are both as bad as each other

Maybin is not as good as Davis (you lose speed on the bases)

Lowe and Wilson are better than Al Albaquerque and Ian Kroll but then again La Roche and Leury Garcia pitched better than that pair.

K-Rod is better than Feliz but not much.

 

I would have said 3-4 wins better off due to the improved pen but not 11 wins.

 

As for the Indians, they have them 3 wins better off, having Lindor for the season probably accounts for that.

 

They have the Twins declining by 5.5 wins despite the emergence of Sano and Buxton

 

They have the Royals declining by 6 wins, they believe that the loss of Cueto, Zobrist, Gallardo, Rios, Madsen and Holland. They feel that the addition of Kennedy and Soria accounts for the 6 win differential. I think that differential could be more.

 

They have our Sox up by 4.5 wins which is possibly conservative when you think that Latos is replacing the Shark (who was awful) Frazier replaces a non-existant third base from last year and Lawrie replaces Sanchez at Second. It could be argued that that could read 82 wins.

 

 

 

QUOTE (glangon @ Feb 12, 2016 -> 02:58 AM)
Cespedes is replaced like for like by Upton

Zimmerman is not as good as Price

Salty is not as good as Avila

Pelfry and Simon are both as bad as each other

Maybin is not as good as Davis (you lose speed on the bases)

Lowe and Wilson are better than Al Albaquerque and Ian Kroll but then again La Roche and Leury Garcia pitched better than that pair.

K-Rod is better than Feliz but not much.

Agreed

Agreed, but Zimmerman is still pretty good.

I think James McCann will be the starting catcher. He is better than Avila.

Agreed

Agreed

I think K-Rod is much better than Feliz

 

Maybe not an 11 win improvement, but I think it's more than what you're saying.

I think that projection for the tigers assumes big bounces back by Verlander, Anibel Sanchez and VMart. Otherwide, it's hard to see them being that successful.

QUOTE (daggins @ Feb 12, 2016 -> 10:56 AM)
I think that projection for the tigers assumes big bounces back by Verlander, Anibel Sanchez and VMart. Otherwide, it's hard to see them being that successful.

Well I don't see Martinez being the worst player in baseball again. I think Sanchez was a bit flukey too, I doubt he gives up that many HR again. Overall I agree with you though, I think the Tigers are overrated, as even with Cespedes and Price last year they still weren't very good, though you still might be underrating them a bit. Personally I'd put their over/under at 82.5 wins. They're relying too much on bounce backs/healthy seasons from guys in their mid 30s who have already dealt with lots of injuries. They could be dangerous, but I could easily see them flopping again too.

Edited by OmarComing25

i wonder if the sox sign any of the following Fa's, would the odds change.

 

next question, if the sox were to go the trade route, i can see either jay bruce, matt kemp, andre ethier ..... as a possible trade targets.

 

i am trying to think whom the sox can trade for that would not required many assets.

 

i am trying to think about a conversation that was done yesterday... on what the sox may do next.

 

~~~ edit... i wrote 2 sentences together.

Edited by LDF

QUOTE (LDF @ Feb 14, 2016 -> 07:02 PM)
i wonder if the sox sign any of the following Fa's, would the odds change.

 

jay bruce, matt kemp, andre ethier .....

 

i am trying to think whom the sox can trade for that would not required many assets.

 

What?

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Feb 15, 2016 -> 02:09 AM)
What?

made the corrections.

QUOTE (glangon @ Feb 12, 2016 -> 02:58 AM)
The Tigers are the most overrated team in baseball this year.

 

74 wins last year.

 

According to Atlanta sports book, losing Cespedes, Price, Avila, Albaquirque, Simon, Rajai Davis, Ian Kroll, and Feliz and replacing them with Cespedes, Zimmerman, K-Rod, Justin Wilson, Mark Lowe, Saltamacchia, Mike Friggin Avila, Cameron Maybin and Mike Pelfrey

 

That is not worth 11 wins.

 

Cespedes is replaced like for like by Upton

Zimmerman is not as good as Price

Salty is not as good as Avila

Pelfry and Simon are both as bad as each other

Maybin is not as good as Davis (you lose speed on the bases)

Lowe and Wilson are better than Al Albaquerque and Ian Kroll but then again La Roche and Leury Garcia pitched better than that pair.

K-Rod is better than Feliz but not much.

 

I would have said 3-4 wins better off due to the improved pen but not 11 wins.

 

As for the Indians, they have them 3 wins better off, having Lindor for the season probably accounts for that.

 

They have the Twins declining by 5.5 wins despite the emergence of Sano and Buxton

 

They have the Royals declining by 6 wins, they believe that the loss of Cueto, Zobrist, Gallardo, Rios, Madsen and Holland. They feel that the addition of Kennedy and Soria accounts for the 6 win differential. I think that differential could be more.

 

They have our Sox up by 4.5 wins which is possibly conservative when you think that Latos is replacing the Shark (who was awful) Frazier replaces a non-existant third base from last year and Lawrie replaces Sanchez at Second. It could be argued that that could read 82 wins.

 

Half of those wins are just from positive regression (progression?). That team should have won more than 74 games.

QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Feb 15, 2016 -> 03:46 AM)
Half of those wins are just from positive regression (progression?). That team should have won more than 74 games.

but with the way the odds are being said about the sox, i just find it hard to believe that they will not win more. i guess i am too much a fan and the hopes are out weighing the realty

Every team is flawed. KC has bad starting pitching. The Twins have bad starting pitching. Indians might have the worst OF in baseball and the Tigers are 1 bad season away from being the AL version of the Phillies.

Sporting news baseball preview magazine have us finishing dead last... and another one second to last.....

YIPPEE!!!! Sounds like 2005 all over again!

Never tell me the odds.

QUOTE (balfanman @ Feb 15, 2016 -> 12:24 PM)
YIPPEE!!!! Sounds like 2005 all over again!

 

oh how i wish for another 2005 season, including the end of season celebration.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.