Jump to content

Gene Honda Civic

Members
  • Posts

    13,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gene Honda Civic

  1. QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 06:53 PM) Cheat, meet Dr. Freud; I believe you two know eachother. Pre-emptive strike... You know there would have been 8 different threads had I not started one in the 8th inning. In fact, I can guarantee there will be a bunch of threads tomorrow morning from the M-F crowd that will essentially be covered by this one.
  2. QUOTE(daa84 @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 05:34 PM) ervin santana Both of them, Jon Garland Quality Starts™
  3. QUOTE(drowninginflame @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 05:25 PM) Our first shutout of the year.......f***ing cubs...WHAT THE f*** um...no
  4. QUOTE(3E8 @ Jun 26, 2005 -> 04:25 PM) The only brightside is that someone outbid me at the last second on Ebay for tickets to today's game. Zero runs in the last 16 innings!!!! yay 51 of the last 58 batters were retired for the Cubs.... One runner reached second base over that stretch... (on a balk).... OBP of .121 over that stretch. NO extra base hits.
  5. You know you wanna.... So just go ahead.
  6. I can't believe Ozzie constructed a line-up where it's possible to have an inning where you would only have to face Ozuna, Pods, and Willie. I would play with no outfielders that inning... OK, maybe one. 7 infielders is overkill.
  7. f*** those articles. Those short sighted losers can't even remember 2000. Remember? We were the darlings of baseball, the best team in June. Too bad there were a rash of injuries, Schueler did relatively nothing putting us over the top, and we got our asses handed to us by a MUCH BETTER Mariners team. 89 mine filled games left. It's a long f***ing season.
  8. QUOTE(Jabroni @ Jun 24, 2005 -> 08:15 PM) Not so sure about that... Carl Everett (career vs. Maddux): 8 for 34 (.235) Since '99, there's no player in baseball with a higher SLG% against the Cubs than Carl. http://www.baseballmusings.com/cgi-bin/Com...r=desc&MinPA=50 .490/.536/.961 -- OUCH
  9. QUOTE(qwerty @ Jun 24, 2005 -> 03:57 PM) Would you say the difference is about a half run or so? It hasn't been half a run in a while... .3 maybe. So far this season the NL is scoring more runs.
  10. He also had an outing where only 2 of the 8 runs he allowed to score one inning were earned. So he's not immune to blame for those runs.
  11. This one's gonna be one of those running threads that keeps getting bumped. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/06240...ml?link=rssfeed -- L. Ron Hubbard, NUTJOB Check page #4, among other things. I about had a coranary thrombosis reading about this guy barely escaping the clutches of the commies.
  12. MOTHER f***ERS DIDN'T EVEN HAVE SOX HIGHLIGHTS ON SPORTCENTER LAST NIGHT
  13. neifi & Timo & whoever's kicking for the bears.
  14. http://stickandballguy.blogspot.com/2005/0...in-kitchen.html
  15. QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jun 24, 2005 -> 01:23 AM) Just remember...the rule of thumb is you have to add roughly .9 to convert an ERA from NL values to AL values. No I can't find the article where that number came from...ESPN.com earlier this year. His numbers put him right in with the best guys in the AL - Buehrle and Rogers. NL teams are scoring more than AL teams this season, and in the past 30 years there has never been a single season in which the difference between runs scored amounted to .9 runs per game.
  16. Since April 25th Lee -- .286/.344/.592 Dye -- .306/.366/.582
×
×
  • Create New...