Everything posted by Chisoxfn
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Sep 15, 2010 -> 05:05 AM) Whoa, I dont know how I missed that the Iowa game is going to be at 9:30 on saturday night. Thats a huge plus. Ya, for Arizona. That is going to be a really really tough game. Arizona is a strong team at home and has a pretty darn good offense. The game scares the hell out of me as a Hawkeye fan.
-
REMINDER: About the rules of this forum
And remember, you can't follow these rules, and you will be suspended. 3 strikes and your out. 3rd suspension will result in a suspension no shorter than 6 months. And if we have to suspend everyone on this forum because no one can behave nicely, than thats what I'll do (That includes mods/admins/etc).
-
Tea Party
QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Sep 9, 2010 -> 08:23 AM) I get to be Balta and make a completely unreasonable connection: "So, you're saying all people with money and power are evil?" Another example of a not ok post. It cleary is a personal attack at another individual. Consider this thread a microcosm of this forum and I'm issuing a mass warning to everyone that particaptes within filabuster that they will have to shape up and stay away from personal attacks and mass generalizations which I will construe as personal attacks. If posters will not, they will be on a strict 3 strikes and your out policy (meaning, 1st 2 times you'll see hefty suspensions, 3rd time you'll be banned from filabuster for a 6 month period). The bulls*** that goes on here will come to a stop and come to a stop quickly. If not, this specific forum (Filabuster) is going to be one inactive place with a s***-ton of suspended users.
-
Tea Party
QUOTE (Paint it Black @ Sep 8, 2010 -> 08:04 PM) "The worst thing in American Politics" isn't on that list. But it's that. Another example of s*** posting that needs to go away.
-
Tea Party
QUOTE (jasonxctf @ Sep 7, 2010 -> 12:03 PM) my high school gym teacher was also a Dr. too. Example #2 of posts that you (and others on both sides of the political agenda) are making that need to dissapear and dissapear fast.
-
Tea Party
QUOTE (jasonxctf @ Sep 7, 2010 -> 11:48 AM) and all of their view points aren't crazy. I just enjoy seeing people who pay the least amount in taxes, 10-20% brackets, (personal income, property, sales, etc) out there screaming about how their taxes are too high. So you are just assuming that tea party people are un-educated poor people? I'm glad you threw some fact into the party. How about next time you make a post you post something of value instead of generalist shots with no legitimacy shot at a group of people supported by various people in this country (including posters that post on tihs board). Thus as far as I'm concerned, your post does construe a personal attack. And this type of s*** needs to stop or there will be some mass bannings/suspensions handed out to people that participate in this forum.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 14, 2010 -> 11:42 AM) Ok, that was a solid reply. The initial response was not appropriate either. It clearly was a shot at the republican base and the type of radio we listen to and it was in the republican thread.
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 13, 2010 -> 05:52 PM) Because it is always popular to hate Michigan. People like to mock Rodriguez as well, forgetting their coach has probably done worse things. Lots of sports fans wear blinders. Not my coach. Ferentz is complete class.
- How old are you?
-
Whats your status?
Thought it be curious. Seems like a lot of us have recently been engaged or married, so thought I'd ask the question.
-
Films Thread
QUOTE (IceCreamPants @ Sep 6, 2010 -> 07:29 AM) Machete was meh to me. It was a really poor mans Inglorious Basterds. It was kind of fun and had all the things you would expect in a Rodriguez film but it just didnt do much for me. But man, that chick naked on the bed in the opening scene was absolutely unbelievable. I hated Inglorious Bastards, but boy did I enjoy Machete. Thoroughly an amusing movie.
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
Iowa did what they needed to. They made a couple foolish turnovers but crushed a bad team like they are supposed to. Rivalry game coming up and Jewel Hampton will be back which will give Iowa much needed help (Robinson/Hampton is a solid duo) at RB since Wegher is currently MIA.
-
Technology catch-all thread
What is the best e-reader to get on the market (factoring in financial costs as well)?
-
Former phenom Prior is pitching to be noticed
I keep thinking I should go and watch him. He plays his home games 5 minutes from where I work (and at the stadium my college baseball team plays at).
-
September Catch-All Thread
GIANT PUSH!!!
-
White Sox could be 2 1/2 games back into possible SAT DH
It doesn't mean squat unless the Sox keep winning!!!!!
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Sep 2, 2010 -> 10:07 AM) The team with the biggest gripe is Wisconsin so of course im part of the group that is displeased. Every day of the week Id trade with Iowa to be in UM/Nebraska's division, I dont care how great Michigan was, they aint what they used to be. And when push comes to shove Id say OSU is going to stay stronger than them in the future. Nebraska v PSU is a toss up. Nebraska hasnt been great for a while and while they have been solid, theyve been in the weaker Big 12 North. Im not just going to say they are better than Iowa/PSU/Wisconsin until they actually play Big 10 games. PSU has the aging Paterno, so its hard to tell what will happen when he eventually retires. Basically Wisconsin was put in the tougher division, lost one of its biggest rivals Iowa and did not even get the Nebraska rivalry they asked for. For the screw job Wisconsin gets to play Nebraska in Madison for Nebraska's first Big 10 game. Im sure most Wisconsin fans would have been much happier with just a small change, something like Minnesota being in the same division as Wisconsin therefore Iowa became the protected rivalry. But Wisconsin basically got nothing they wanted. As a pure fan of football, I would have really loved it if the Iowa/Wisconsin rivalry continued. Iowa would than be able to still have its rivalries with Minnesota and Wisconsin intact, plus they get to establish a new rivalry with Nebraska (which should be a great one). But I guess as we lose the Wisconsin rivalry (or at least the annual portion of it), we at least add what should be an intriguing Nebraska rivalry. Clearly from a scheduling standpoint, the fact that Ohio State plays Michigan every year where as Iowa will play Purdue every year (as opposed to Wisconson) I supposed it is an advantage to us (from the pure overall record standpoint) but I like playing good teams and watching good games (even if it diminishes my teams shot at necessarily having a dominant record). The good thing is Iowa/Wisconsin should remain as strong teams and at least both of our college football programs were shown a lot of respect to be basically annoited as top tier programs in the conference (along with PSU/Nebraska/Michgian/OSU). Clearly we don't compare with OSU, but whose to say that Iowa/Wisconsin can't be better than the rest of that group on an annual long-term basis.
-
The Cove
QUOTE (IceCreamPants @ Sep 1, 2010 -> 09:34 PM) You just watch anything when you are alone on business, don't you? You should just watch porn like all the rest of the corporate world. It was actually with my wife. She was devasted when she say the dolphins being harpooned/stabbed to death.
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Sep 1, 2010 -> 05:04 PM) Rock, you're thinking too short term. I think they looked at more of a history of the programs. Yeah Michigan isn't very good right now, but they will likely be back over the long haul. And if they aren't, who the heck cares about the Michigan/OSU protection thing anyways. Clearly by people worrying about that matchup, people think Michigan will get back to where they were, and soon. Otherwise that game turns irrelevant. You have traditional powers on each side (OSU/PSU, Mich/Neb) You have two middle/good guys (Wisc/Pur, Iowa/MSU) You have two...s***ty programs (ILL/IU, NU/Min) Well said.
-
Official 2010-2011 NCAA Football Thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Sep 1, 2010 -> 04:41 PM) Well its going to be the case of teams in one division beating up each other perhaps. It really makes zero sense to me the way they split it. You have 3 out of the 4 top programs on one side while the other IMO has only one real good program. Michigan is a ways off from being relevant again and the others are second tier teams. Is the split necessary in basketball? Because then its even more lopsided. Ohio State is better than everyone in the conference right now. Iowa, Nebraska, and Michigan are all capable of being better than PSU and Wisconsin from season to season. And other seasons the other 2 are capable of being better. However, Nebraska and Michigan both have the ability to be better than PSU and Wisconsion long-term and Iowa/Wisconsin are very similar programs. While Ohio State is the best school in the conference, the lesser tier teams in there division aren't quite as good as the lesser tier teams in the other division. In general, I tend to think this is one of the fairer splits they could have done, however, I wouldn't be lying if I didn't think Iowa didn't get a good advantage. However, Iowa playing Purdue just makes no sense as our rivalry game. Iowa/Wisconsin is a far bigger rivalry (albeit it would make our schedule tougher)
-
AND THAT'S A WHITE SOX SWEEP!!!
Come on Tigers, win these next 2 against the Twins. BOOOOO TWINS BOOO.....I PUT A HEX ON YOU!!!
-
MANNYPALOOZA 2-0!!! SOX WIN!!!
I haven't heard one thing about Peavy not pitching. Peavy is supposed to begin throwing shortly and is expected to be on track to be starting spring training games. That could obviously all get pushed back, but from what has been reported Peavy's recovery has been fine thus far. In terms of Edwin, the good news is, he'll get an extra days rest since we have Thursday off.
-
Sox @ Indians
Twins threatening, runner on 2nd with no one out. Huddy k's, 1 down now with runner on 2nd.
-
Sox @ Indians
QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Aug 31, 2010 -> 05:29 PM) You forgot about Morel. He's been on fire in AAA as of late. I could see Morel at 3rd next year with Viciedo at DH/1B and Teahen getting some playing time at all three spots. Don't know how that happened cause I like Morel the most out of our position prospects (with exception of Mitchell and Trayce Thompson).
-
Sox @ Indians
QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Aug 31, 2010 -> 05:28 PM) Jason, you're not feeling me. KW deals prospects like they're set to expire. I'm just saying that say we wanted to deal Flowers for something of value that letting it get out they were willing to deal him for a rental probably won't help. The Twins dealt Wilson Ramos for an expiring Matt Capps. Didnt' mean Ramos had no value. Teams deal prospects at the deadline, it doesn't mean we are saying we won't give up anything for him. And everyone knows Kenny isn't a guy that tries to PWN a team in a deal. He tries to make a fair deal and it is why he is able to make so many deals. At the end of the day, he was essentially offering Hudson and Flowers for Dunn. That is essentially the equivalent of 2 top picks or so. So to me, that says that we value Flowers at the level of a 1st round pick. Problem was, the Nats didn't think he was that good.