GreenSox

Sonny Gray is a 1 year rent. Why should the Sox be interested in trading prospects for that? Plus, the Yankees want the price as if he's the old Sonny Gray, peddling the "he just didn't like NY". That may be the case, but it may not be. Certainly don't pay a price as if it is.

No, unless they are moving Abreu....and there appear to be openings in that regard if they are so inclined. But still no....the love for aging players on 2 year contracts... And for goodness sakes don't trade pitching.

Salary should be reasonable. I don't see much downside risk and the Sox are in a position to make these kind of moves. I hope they sign him.

His walks were out of sight in 2017; they were improved, but still too high in 2018, but his Ks were really high too.

Because they already started. I bet even your Todd Frazier bobblehead knows the actual moves they made this offseason: 2 trades for 2 2-year players. And another for a 1 year player. The controllables were all outgoing. And because that's what they do. I hope this trio, unlike the others, can actually play to their reputations.

Except they aren't going to be swept out. If they weren't swept out after the 2014-16 (especially 2016) debacle, why would they be this time? I guess there could be a tipping point for everyone, but it's hard to have confidence that this will be the tipping point. Re chasing Machado/harper, my fear is that if they sign one, they will then act in desperation to accumulate veteran players at stiff prices. Also, it could be argued that it is distracting them from building this team....not with veterans by by finding trading other young players. They have an abundance of outfield prospects, but are thin everywhere else, including pitching.

Hardly

Which facebook group has all this stuff....I'm willing to risk it.

Because that's just -I don't know what to call it - who the heck does that? And the Sox have done enough in that regard: they downgraded catcher and traded for a first basemen who isn't very good and in a position of non-need. The second trade makes them less competitive and blocks a spot for young player development, and the catcher move arguably might as well.

The point was whether this team can contend in 2019. The only way for that to happen is to start trading these prospects for players like Reamulto and others on 1/2 year contracts...and then signing guys like Pollock, who is injury prone and already in decline at 31. And even with that, it would take a lot of luck. Machado or Harper would be a piece of the core, so I'm all for signing one...but to win next year with one of them is unrealistic and would be damaging to attempt. The only way to build this team into a winner is to build a core of young talent. Right now, the core stands at zero. None of the young players have proven that they are above average starters, much less all star level players. They may become one, they should, but we don't know which ones will and which ones won't. In 2014, they decided that the rebuild/retool was finished, and started trading for rents off of 73 wins. This would be similar.

And then ruin it for 2022 on. This is the nonsense this Front Office pulled in 2014-2016, while they rubbed their lucky rabbit's foot. Adding Machado adds, what, 6 wins to the mighty 62 from 2018? Where are the other 25 wins coming from?

Dick Allen Bucky Dent Wilbur Wood Frank Thomas Mark Buehrle

yes it would be interesting. Prefer this plan to loading up with the Orioles. It also seems to me that any trepidation about competitiveness isn't whether the Sox will be competitive in years 1-2 (they won't be and loading up with Orioles will guarantee it) but in the years after that.

Indeed, it would be nuts even if they sign harper or Machado. Worse than the 2014-2016 Hahn clownshow.

I think we have a decent chance...but if we get one (or both), it will come with an early buyout. I just don't see either one of these guys signing up for 10 years of the Sox until Hahn proves that he can build a winner. That would put a c. 3 year window on contention, which, while reasonable, might encourage the FO to start making trades for veterans to accelerate it. And that spells big trouble.

Sounds like a great guy. But what needs to happen is that either he or Abreu need to be traded. it's ridiculous to have 2 vets covering 1B/DH in a rebuilding situation where young players need ABs.

Maybe not Fulmer over Buehler, but drafting Fulmer and then not giving him the time or having the patience for him to smooth out his delivery says something.

I hear what you are saying, but even if the Sox hit on Robert, it's only 1/10 he's a Harper. No one gets a Harper 2/10 tries. As for getting productive major leaguers, yes, they should hit better than 2/10. And yes, I agree that part of this is to mask and/or energize a rebuild that appears stunted. Well, so be it.

Hahn's best trade was Eaton #1. He's gone that route only once since: Davidson/Reed, which I still think was well intended and worth the risk. Regardless, 50% leaves you a big winner. So why did he stop? Those are the kind of moves this team needs now, 5 years later. They don't need guys past their prime (like Alonso). Re the rebuild, he's already whiffed on 1 major pitching prospect and likely a 2nd; none of the others have proven that they are even mid-rotation guys. There have been no whiffs on the position side yet, but no absolute hits either. Hopefully we see real progress soon.

The pitching didn't exactly shine either.

That would be terrible for the Dodgers.

Lester was about 60% of the cost of these guys. But Astros, Brewers, Braves, As, etc. Indians didn't need anyone like that. You just have to be able to assemble a large group of ascending young players in order to win (harper/machado or not).

It shouldn't though. Other successful rebuilders didn't need FAs at this level (or at this point in the rebuild) to build the core and complete the mission. I think they need them because, well, Hahn is running this rebuild and I think he needs a boost. But it shouldn't.

Kluber, yes. Pollock is one of those mid tier FA who are best avoided, imo. As for Harper, they'll probably have to break the luxury tax, but I think they'll do it with a shorter term deal. Yes that would mean Harper "leaves money on the table" but he'll be 30 when he has a chance to get it back and more.

Burger was a reach and otherwise dubious pick, but, no, the Sox don't need a bunch of rentals. They need to develop a core, if they can.