bmags

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 03:27 PM) If not done this offseason I think the chance he goes full blown free agent is a better reality. Agreed.

BA's Cooper makes good point that it may not be a coincidence this punishment drops before Otani comes over.

Info on the players released: https://www.baseballamerica.com/internation...ospects-braves/ I like Soto if we can't afford the higher end guys. Love reading good baseball instincts with lower level guys.

What I'm taking from that is if the 300k exists, the most we can offer is 500k. But we don't know anyway.

QUOTE (GenericUserName @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 03:22 PM) Did anyone say if the $300k penalty is still in place? If not we are probably in good position not having any commitments for next year and money left for this year. I have not seen anything clarifying this. Passan's tweets on dipping into next years was vague on it.

Okay from Manfred's statement which is only an image from JJ Coopers tweet I can't seem to save: It seems the reason they came down so hard was that the braves were doing the same sort of thing as the red sox, but so dramatically as to avoid the "overage" penalty that would have prevented them from being players in the 2016 class, which they went BIG on. Beyond that year, they were doing the same sign a bunch of low level players to funnel money to other players to get past 300k. IF that's all they were doing, they'd have red sox sanctions. Makes sense. They shouldn't have had a 2016 INTl season, so all of those players are released.

Dannggggg Coppy is banned for life from MLB

Getting any would be nice. Our farm isn't necessarily young, so this provides a starting point to a new "wave" as Rick is trying to create.

Moore didn't even really deny it.

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:39 PM) Question is, which team gets busted next? I doubt them and the Red Sox are the only ones cheating in one way or another when it comes to these signings/agreements. We know the punishments now, is a report going to come out? It may be interesting to know what was so brazen as to make this so much more severe.

I mean wilder was basically racketeering, I actually think we got off light but reality was he was committing crimes against white sox so it's not the same as an org "cheating".

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:22 PM) So basically what we did after the Wilder fiasco Ha, well at least they got some benefit to it pre penalty. We got nothing from Wilder AND then had to start from scratch years later.

QUOTE (Quin @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:18 PM) Guys, Austin is full of hotter takes than J4L we know this J4L is mostly right. Austin's still trying to land one.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:19 PM) Soto and Yefri del Rosario had also both made it to the United States. Wow. Soto had a nice 12% walk rate as a 17 year old in gulf league. No power yet. Could be interesting.

I am pleased with the MLB here. This is sufficient punishment and should be a deterrent in the future. I wonder if issue was braves literally paying out to some of these players prior to contract to ensure they never really hit the market.

Third rate coach, gtfo. s*** didn't hurt Jaylen Brown. Johnny Jones sure ruined Ben Simmons.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:21 PM) Its probably good pr for both of them. Trump's base likely loves this stuff and I doubt that many of Ball's potential customers are going to side with Trump. It's why i'm not sure this will ever end. These two found each other and neither will blink. You aren't supposed to cross these streams.

I'm sympathetic to the view that Trump's election led to the revelations about weinstein actually "meaning" something. Trump being teflon to those accusations I think made people realize how performative the reactions to these claims have been. Something like the problem was they got caught. Maybe not the best way to put it, but the sheer number of victims from cosby to weinstein and how they were enabled made people wake up to something.

Also mizzou played so bad the last two games. I don't know if they are a tourney team without porter, probably not. But makes sense they may have had something else on their minds.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:32 PM) Back surgery/problems is definitely something that could cost the guy first round status. True, but if he works out and people say he looks okay, you go. If not, poor kid. Basketball has those handful of cases where star loses their career to injury. But largely I like the sport because it's not debilitated by star injuries each year. Can't imagine the pain of losing it all right as it's about to begin.

QUOTE (Dam8610 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:23 PM) Dom Nunez, Jason Martin, and some of the arms seem interesting. Not much beyond that, though. It's a group in which I could see Jordan Guerrero in the top 5. These three were from longenhagen as 3 that surprised him weren't protected: Ryan O'Hearn http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?playe...itting/2017/ALL Carlos Tocci (CF) https://www.baseball-reference.com/register...id=tocci-000car Wyatt Strahan https://www.baseball-reference.com/register...id=straha000wya Also Charcer Burks from the cubs https://www.baseball-reference.com/register...id=burks-000cha

Brutal it's true. I never even got to watch the guy play once in a mizzou jersey. This sucks.

QUOTE (cjgalloway @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:08 PM) We aren't in play here right? Since we can only offer 300k.. or can we go over? Is this a special case? I'm confused lol Short answer, we don't know. Safe bet: they will be put in the 2017 pool which we can only spend 300k. Does that mean we have no chance? Hard to know, this will be a strange market. A runner up to Otani will have probably increased their available space and will have most money to offer. But maybe we are able to sign some of the non Maitans, maybe Maitan has some different criteria he's looking for. We'll have no idea. I'd say we have a much better shot at Maitan than Otani!

QUOTE (JenksIsMyHero @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 12:02 PM) I mean, he's right, but the problem here is less about the legality of it and more about whether we want representatives to be the types of people that would be involved in a situation like that. Yeah, i'm sure there are disgruntled employees who may be seeking revenge by filing false claims, but usually where there is smoke there's fire. Right. They have decided to solve that problem by creating a system of zero oversight which has much more predictable and irresponsible consequences for public servants.

When a Gabe DeArmond, Matter etc say that I"ll believe it. But secretly I've thought it was a season ender since Utah. Too much secrecy, too clear they had no idea what it was.