Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

bmags

Admin
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bmags

  1. Probably true.
  2. I am going to do a dollar/WAR count up actually because I am intrigued by the answer so I will follow-up with it. At the very least the previous ones you mentioned had legitimate plus players in frazier and robertson.
  3. Same! This outfield is unbelievably bad and also has no interesting players that maybe could be a starter with playing time.
  4. do you really only exist for this reason? Stop following him around and sniping.
  5. this offseasons acquisitions have been the most brutal of his entire tenure, including his first offseason that was basically keppinger.
  6. There are some wonderful players. They are the types of "over the hump" acquisitions. Thats what made this year nice (sigh) these were franchise aligning ones. You need to get the most out of the immediate value of next years guys. I'm telling you the guy I think should be targeted first is Castellanos. The future offense does not look good enough. If they deliver castellanos and a pitcher its good for me. I'll say Ive not completely discounted the chance that our player dev could improve dramatically this year. Getz doesn't seem like an idiot, but the org doesn't prioritize anything really. I literally don't know what they prioritize.
  7. oh another thing to add for the next time: - not getting mad at national media for discounting the white sox chances of pulling off a dramatic free agent acquisition.
  8. That's the same thing!
  9. Basically as a sox fan we have to hope that we get lucky. We won't out execute, we won't out spend, but...maybe we'll get lucky?
  10. Yeah, he wasn't the worst owner. But I'm tired of having an owner more invested in the health of the league than the health of the franchise. Like, dude, the revenues are 10 billion, stop forcing your franchise to be the martyr just so you can bend the cba to you year after year.
  11. I feel very confident that if sox offered him 10 for 340 he would have signed it despite these limitations.
  12. people only care about it because of the luxury tax implications which will matter for a team like the phillies that invests in its ball club. Would have mattered less for white sox who are unlikely to ever operate at that level.
  13. and the phillies get a rare elite asset to provide value to their baseball team during what looks like a competitive run. Seems fair to me.
  14. and, I don't understand why it needs to be repeated, but baseball isn't a traditional business and all the owners are billionaires.
  15. If the sox actually need to operate under similar constraints as the cleveland baseball team than they need to operate with the same efficiency as the cleveland baseball team.
  16. the dodgers have one of the deepest teams in baseball, one of the best and most productive pipelines of international free agency and dominate their division. I think they are doing fine.
  17. I hate garpax with a passion. They are much better than the kwpres/hahngm era because they can still draft well, and hahn has shown no strength in the traditional team building avenues which is why they needed a big splash.
  18. Anything south of 350 i would have felt disappointed sox didn't go for.
  19. oh totally. We learned a lot for the next go around though: - "stealth mode" is not a thing. maybe for trades, it isn't for free agents. - jerry reinsdorfs ability as a businessman could not matter less - how elite free agents value themselves matters, and if you aren't prepared to sign them at their value, plan your organization accordingly.
  20. People are confusing "upset because this deal should not have been out of reach for a team that seriously targeted the top free agents for 2 years and need it for a stifled rebuild" with "upset because they believed they were getting harper and didn't" I will always believe the sox are capable of making the correct and achievable choice, and always upset when they can't execute it.
  21. I didn't say they couldn't get any better, that's the argument you created. Moncada had a 97 wrc+. Giolito legitimately had the worst xfip among eligible starters in baseball. If moncada gets slightly better he's above average. If giolito gets slightly better he still may be one of the worst starters in baseball. I think he will get better, he needs to get extraordinarily better.
  22. Obviously the present is always more fun than the past, but the next 8 years they can build a disgusting offense, in 2032 $25 mill for a player will be annoying but not destructive. And as always, no trade clauses and dollar amounts are bad in that they reduce your return, but they are not insurmountable.
  23. 13 years 330. Again, the cheat codes were there to sign these guys. Sox live in a bubble where they didn't think it mattered.
  24. It is pretty high expectations to expect him to not be the worst pitcher in baseball.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.