bmags

Haven’t seen any timeline, wasn’t listed as serious. That said, don’t be surprised if he’s out for way longer than he should.

He would have succeeded had we been able to develop him ourselves.

Sounds promising.

By people I mean New York fans.

I’m not sure that people are prepared for how crazy the result could be. Seems like people still in their head are still assuming top position will mean top pick.

Honestly would be terrified for a Mizzou pick to screw things up more than excited he’s good. Though Mizzous track record for top picks is pretty good. Aaron crow was probably the worst but he still had an mlb career.

I’m super positive on him, just joking about it since he was only Missouri’s hitting coach for a month, likely doing limited work with the team.

Honestly Sullivan’s piece sucks because they have him doing the entire sports section every day so he tried to multitask a bunch of takes.

Is there anyone that compiles player stats for only weekend series?

He can hit the absolute crap out of the ball and that's a good skill. If he can smooth his deficiencies to average then you have one elite skill carrying the player and that's good!

They also had him DH because of nagging injuries. I really find scouts info on hitting projections and pitching projections seriously, I find body projections short of adding power, health and defense reports less seriously.

Matt Lisle must have done a number on misner.

This was one of the reasons I was so disappointed. If given the choice, and you say on one choice the sox would develop talent and scout as well as the indians or I could have manny, I'd choose the former. Manny just helped paper over some of the deficit to allow the hit rate on stars from our farm system to be lower, but now it has to be really high on starters and a few stars. Now, I'm open to the idea things are better than the results. Last year above all was brutal largely due to injuries. Hansen could not recover post injury mentally or whatever. Collins and Sheets were the downers, but then it was mostly the 4A guys in cordell and tilson that they got nothing from. Everyone else was decent but just got crushed by injuries. Dunning, robert, kopech, adolfo, burger (not decent, ended up nothing. Maybe with health this year they show they are at another level and...great. Hope so!

He is so below average Id prefer he work on figuring out harnessing his curve again and working backward.

So this article says he worked back up to 94 mph at some point https://newsok.com/article/5603029/manny-banuelos-enjoying-a-resurgence-with-the-oklahoma-city-dodgers Basically, he had TJ in 2013, completely lost all of his velo and was at 85-86, in 2017 he made his way to the dodgers and found his strength again and was back up to 94 where he was really good in AAA last year and caught sox radar. My take is basically that he's happy he has maintained his velocity and we should expect it around 92-93 and top out and 94 until someone says otherwise. He also throws a cutter in the article so maybe he'll play well with cooper.

Fegan tweeted out Banuelos was at 92-93mph and that he was really excited about that.

It's just Jerry filling up his Glendale vault with gold coins to enjoy a morning swim.

Agree. But ultimately for me its if he can make as much progress in discipline as matt davidson made last year, I believe in his power is just this much better that he can become a plus offensive player.

Moncada / Robert / Anderson / Madrigal is going to be some brilliant baserunning at some point.

Here is a fantastic writeup from Fegan that discusses lambert and other pitchers and how the sox incorporating data and analytics into their development. https://theathletic.com/835962/2019/02/25/give-everything-a-chance-the-many-ways-white-sox-prospects-utilize-pitch-data-or-not/

Roberts speed is really something.

If Bryce truly held up a lot last year to stay healthy at cost of his defense, a short term deal becomes problematic because if he does the same, he'll have 2 terrible years out of 3 that show he can't play the field and his next contract could be for that of a 1b/dh.

I voted for roll with what they have. Considering the strike out on top players, I'd be open to trading for Joc depending on cost. If it's what someone said (fulmer, something something), it's a buy low and offers chance for sox to negotiate in only place they are effective...when there are no other bidders. I like Joc's talent a lot, and if you have a plethora of good outfielders, then you have a great outfield with a perfect platoon bat. You can let joc prove if he can CF or not, and if he is a true CFer, you can trade him having proved his value again. Now, that package seemed incredible at time, but I guess possible when they just wanted to get rid of a redundancy with pollock? Now I would assume what "gets it done" may include a basabe and I'm not really interested in trading that away.

This just continues to convince me on Abrams. I actually like this draft. I'd be very happy with abrams and witt, and would have quiet excitement on vaughn. Of course the likelihood all 4 are good (rutschman) is low, so I'm wrong on one of em.

The saddest what-if with this game is Gio could have been the most productive prospect in sox history that never played a game for them...he was the proposed headliner for Miguel Cabrera.